UC Davis Health
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
NCT Number: NCT03365908
This study will compare the outcome of pain interventions that are considered standard of care during the surgical treatment of ACL injuries. The comparison will be looking at pain control during and after ACL surgery as well as functional outcomes in patients that had a nerve block versus those who did not. The investigators hypothesize that pain control will be equal between both groups.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Specific Aim #1: To determine if there is a difference in opioid pain medication use following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction between an oral pain regimen versus adductor canal block.
Specific Aim #2: To determine if there is a difference in knee recovery and function post-operatively following ACL reconstruction between an oral pain regimen versus adductor canal block.
Specific Aim #3: To determine if cost-effectiveness or patient flow logistics of ACL reconstruction are affected by whether has patient has adductor canal block versus receiving oral pain medication regimen.
Specific Aim #4: To determine if pre-operative Resiliency scores are associated with post-operative pain and outcomes following ACL reconstruction.
Hypothesis #1: There is no difference in post-operative pain management or functional outcomes following ACL reconstruction based on whether patient had adductor canal block versus an oral pain medication regiment implemented.
Hypothesis #2: Worse resiliency scores pre-operatively are associated with worse outcomes and pain scores post-operatively following ACL reconstruction.
Upon enrollment and at at the participant's pre-op appointment, the participant will complete a questionnaire entitled the Brief Resiliency Scale (BRS) to determine the participant's resiliency score and receive post-operative pain medication prescriptions. At time of surgery the participant will begin a pain diary to chronicle use of pain medication for 6 weeks and turn this document in at the 6-week follow-up appointment along with documentation of time to first able to walk (ambulate) without assistive device (i.e. crutch, walker, etc.). In the recovery room, the participant will verbally complete a Visual Analog Scale to determine the pain level at 15 minutes after surgery and before discharge. At the 3-month post-op visit, the participant will complete another questionnaire entitled the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) to determine operative knee pain and function. At the 6-month post-op visit, the participant will complete a questionnaire entitled Marx Activity Rating Scale to determine operative knee function.
The treatment will be chosen by chance, like flipping a coin. Neither the participant nor the study doctor will choose what treatment the participant receives. The participant will have a one in two chance of being given each treatment. The participant will know which treatment was given but the operating surgeon will not know.
The participant will be randomized to 1 of 2 standard of care treatment groups at the time of surgery:
Regardless of treatment group, all participants pre-operatively will receive the following pain medication: 400 mg celecoxib (Celebrex), 300 mg gabapentin (Neurontin), and 1 g of acetaminophen (Tylenol) 1-2 hours before surgery. This oral regimen is similar to standard of care pre-operative medication in total knee arthroplasties (knee replacements).
All participants will also receive the same post-operative prescriptions at their pre-operative clinic visit which will be: 90 tablets of 1 g acetaminophen to be taken three times a day for 30 days and 90 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone with 1-2 tablets to be taken every 4 to 6 hours as needed for pain. Additionally, the participant will receive two medications (Zofran, Phenergan) for nausea/vomiting which are to be taken as needed. Participants will record their medication use.
ACL reconstruction and any other procedures to address any other damage in the participants's knee as determined by the surgeon will be performed as per standard clinical practice at an outpatient surgical facility. The participant will undergo standard post-operative rehabilitation. During the standard of care post-operative visits in the Sports Medicine Clinic, the participant will be asked to fill out questionnaires specific for our data collection.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
An adductor canal nerve block with 15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be performed pre-operatively by Anesthesiology.
15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine will be administered for the adductor canal block
Time frame: 15 min post-op
Measured via Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in recovery, scale from 0 (least) to 10 (maximum), no units, with 0 being no pain and 10 being extreme pain
Time frame: 6 weeks post-op
Aggregated amount of narcotic medication used, measured in milligrams
Time frame: 6 weeks post-op
Functional recovery of knee following surgery as measured by Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (no units), range from 0 - 100 with 0 representing extreme problems with the knee and 100 representing no problems
Time frame: 12 weeks post-op
Functional recovery of knee following surgery as measured by Marx activity score (no unit), 0 - 16, with 0 representing significant limitation in activity due to knee and 16 representing no limitations
Time frame: 24 weeks post-op
Functional recovery of knee following surgery as measured by Tegner activity score (no units), range from 0 - 10, with 0 representing inability to work or perform daily activities due to knee and 10 representing ability to compete in high-level activities
Time frame: Immediately after surgery
Amount of time, measured in minutes, participants required in PACU before discharge due to pain control
University of California, Davis
Other
Pain Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Evaluation of Adductor Canal Block Versus Oral Pain Regimen
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04650568
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07129694
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT06189573
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Mexico City, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT06961292
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Beijing, China
View Trial Details