Asociacion Para Evitar la Ceguera en Mexico, I.A.P.
Mexico City, 04030, Mexico
NCT Number: NCT07640256
The purpose of this study was to compare two different anesthesia methods for pain control during panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), a type of laser surgery that treats proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
The study included eyes from patients with diabetes and proliferative diabetic retinopathy who were scheduled to undergo their first PRP session. Participants were split into two groups to receive either peribulbar anesthesia, which is a type of anesthesia injected through the eyelid, or a sham injection with topical anesthesia only.
Pain on a numerical scale and vital signs were recorded before and for 15 minutes during PRP. These results were compared between the two groups to determine which method delivers superior pain control.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Mexico City, 04030, Mexico
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A mixture of 1.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 1.5 mL of 2% lidocaine was prepared in a 3 mL syringe. The peribulbar injection was administered using a 25G needle inserted horizontally through the inferior palpebral conjunctiva, directed axially over the infraorbital rim, and then angled upward to deliver the anesthetic into the orbit.
A single drop of topical 5% tetracaine
Time frame: Pain on the NRS scale was measured at the 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-minute marks while undergoing PRP application in each eye.
patient perception of pain during PRP administration in each eye, measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS measures pain intensity on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 corresponds to the absence of pain and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: at baseline before the start of PRP, and at the 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-minute marks while undergoing PRP application in each eye.
Heart rate measured as beats per minute using the Aquarius Vital Sign Monitor (Shenzhen Northern Meditec Limited, Shenzhen, China)
Time frame: at baseline before the start of PRP, and at the 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-minute marks while undergoing PRP application in each eye.
Respiratory rate measured as breaths per minute using the Aquarius Vital Sign Monitor (Shenzhen Northern Meditec Limited, Shenzhen, China)
Time frame: at baseline before the start of PRP, and at the 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-minute marks while undergoing PRP application in each eye.
Oxygen saturation was measured as SpO2 using the Aquarius Vital Sign Monitor (Shenzhen Northern Meditec Limited, Shenzhen, China)
Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México
Other
Safety and Efficacy of Peribulbar Anesthesia for Pain Management in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy During Panretinal Photocoagulation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02879422
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Reims, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04278417
Eye Diseases, Metaplasia
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07144865
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06583798
Eye Diseases, Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Palakkad, Kerala, India
View Trial Details