Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02982109

Pain Evaluation of Venous Cannulation to Predict Postoperative Pain

The investigators have recently reported a relationship between pain induced by peripheral venous cannulation and postoperative pain. The purpose of this study is to validate this method of postoperative pain prediction in a larger cohort subjected to different types of surgery.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Hallands Hospital Halmstad

Halmstad, Halland County, 30581, Sweden

About this study

  • The investigators will study all adult (>18 years old) patients going through surgery at the site during a defined period of time. Before induction of anesthesia participants will be asked to assess (in VAS units) the pain intensity associated with peripheral venous cannulation. The maximum level of postoperative pain intensity will be recorded in the post-anesthesia care unit.
  • After the endpoint of the study, the patient records will be reviewed, and de-identified relevant data be recorded and analyzed in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software.
  • Sample size assessment: In a previous study patients scoring ≥ 2.0 on venous cannulation assessed their median pain postoperatively at 5.8 VAS units compared with 2.9 in those scoring < 2.0 - corresponding to a difference in maximum postoperative pain intensity of almost three VAS units. To statistically confirm, with unpaired non-parametric tests, 80 % power (β), and 95% probability (1- α), half of that difference (1.5 VAS units) in pain intensity level between patients scoring above or below 2.0 VAS units, respectively, would require 55 patients in each group subjected to the same kind of surgery. With 4 groups of cases and controls 440 patients would need to be included. As the study is strictly observational, 600 patients will be included to make up for possible missing data.
  • Statistics: The Mann-Whitney U- test will be used to compare differences in postoperative pain intensity levels, and the Pearson Chi-square test to compare proportions of patients with moderate or severe postoperative pain, in patients differing in pain scores (above or below 2.0 VAS units) on venous cannulation. Logistic regression analysis will be used to adjust for gender and age and to evaluate the predictive ability of proposed method.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-80 years old
  • Scheduled for surgery in Halmstad
  • Prepared for surgery in the preoperative ward or ward 71 (day-case or direct admittance)

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to handle the Visual Analog Scale
  • Hospitalized already before surgery

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum postoperative pain intensity (0.0-10.0 VAS units)

    Time frame: 2 hours after surgery

    Patients scoring their pain associated with venous cannulation to <2 VAS units will be compared to patients scoring ≥2 VAS units considering median level of maximum postoperative pain intensity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Risk of developing moderate to severe postoperative pain

    Time frame: 2 hours after surgery

    Proportion of patients with moderate or severe (≥4 VAS units) postoperative pain will be compared between groups of patients scoring </≥ 2 VAS units on peripheral venous cannulation.

  2. Influence of gender

    Time frame: 2 hours after surgery

    With logistic regression analysis investigate the potential influence of gender on the predictive ability of this test.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Lund University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Prediction of Postoperative Pain From Individually Assessed Pain Intensity Levels Associated With Venous Cannulation

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Dec 5, 2016
Registry last updated
Apr 4, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.