Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Jongno-gu, 03080, South Korea
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06699342
This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation and pharmacologic treatment optimized according to guidelines in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory or intolerant to drug therapy or catheter ablation.
Interested in participating?
Request Info65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seoul, Jongno-gu, 03080, South Korea
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion:
Patients who meet all of the following inclusion criteria 1)-6).
Exclusion:
Patients who meet at least one of the following exclusion criteria 1)-11).
Left bundle branch pacing is a novel pacing modality that can bypass the pathological or disease-vulnerable region in the cardiac conduction system, to provide physiological pacing modality for patients.
The procedure involves the implantation of a permanent pacemaker with a pacing lead positioned at the left bundle branch area to achieve physiological conduction system pacing. LBBAP-Pacemaker device and leads should be implanted according to the physician's standard practice.
Atrioventricular node ablation uses heat energy, called radiofrequency energy, to destroy the area between the upper and lower heart chambers. This area is called the atrioventricular node.
Pharmacologic therapy includes rate control with beta-blockers (e.g., bisoprolol), calcium channel blockers (e.g., diltiazem), or antiarrhythmic drugs (e.g., flecainide, propafenone, dronedarone, amiodarone) along with anticoagulation therapy (e.g., apixaban) as per current clinical guidelines (e.g., ESC 2024 or ACC/AHA/HRS 2023) in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation refractory or intolerant to drug therapy or catheter ablation.
Treatment is tailored based on patient tolerance and clinical efficacy.
Time frame: 6 months after intervention.
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months after intervention.
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains, including physical functioning, bodily pain, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
The EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) evaluates health-related quality of life using a descriptive system with five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scores are derived as an index value (range: -0.594 to 1)
The value attached to an EQ-5D profile according to a set of weights that reflect, on average, people's preferences about how good or bad the state is. Values are anchored at 1 (full health) and 0 (a state as bad as being dead) as required by their use in economic evaluation. Values less than 0 represent health states regarded as worse than a state that is as bad as being dead. An EQ-5D value is also sometimes known as an 'index', 'score' or 'utility'
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
The NYHA functional classification system assesses the severity of heart failure symptoms on a scale from Class I (best) to Class IV (worst). Changes in functional class will be evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months after the intervention to determine the impact on patients' physical activity and symptom burden.
Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months after intervention
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after intervention.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used cognitive screening tool that assesses various cognitive domains, including memory, attention, language, visuospatial skills, and executive function. The MoCA score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. A score of 26 or above is generally considered normal, while lower scores suggest cognitive impairment. Changes in MoCA scores will be evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months post-intervention.
Time frame: 24 months after intervention.
Time frame: 24 months after intervention.
Death from any cause during the 24-month follow-up period.
Time frame: 24 months after intervention.
*Worsening HF with or without hospitalization: symptoms, signs, imaging, and analytical criteria that require unplanned medical attention with an increase of diuretic use, intravenous diuretic therapy
Time frame: 24 months after intervention.
Participants meeting at least one of the criteria: (a) all-cause mortality, (b) worsening heart failure.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Seoul National University Hospital
Other
Acronym: PALLIATE-AF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07728539
Acute Cerebrovascular Accident, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07726056
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Melbourne, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT07724899
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07175428
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Dothan, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details