Standard radiotherapy
Radiationstandard FDG-PET-based radiotherapy
Other names: standard
NCT Number: NCT06102057
Multinational, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter phase II trial. Eligible patients will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to Experimental Arm (FDG-PET-based small volume accelerated radiotherapy with concurrent standard of care chemotherapy) or Conventional Arm (standard FDG-PET-based radiotherapy with concurrent standard of care chemotherapy). Patients showing complete response, partial response, or stable disease following chemoradiotherapy will receive standard of care consolidation therapy with durvalumab (fixed dose of 1500 mg q4w) for up to 12 months or until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, patient´s wish, or investigator´s decision, whichever comes first.
After end of durvalumab therapy, patients will undergo safety follow up for 90 (+7) days followed by survival follow up until overall end of study. Overall end of study will be reached 24 months after the last patient has started durvalumab therapy. Patients showing PD following chemoradiotherapy will be treated according to investigator´s decision but will be followed up until overall end of study.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Universitätsklinik Carl Gustav Carus der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
standard FDG-PET-based radiotherapy
Other names: standard
concurrent standard of care chemotherapy
Other names: standard
standard of care consolidation therapy with durvalumab (fixed dose of 1500 mg q4w) for up to 12 months or until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, patient´s wish, or investigator´s decision, whichever comes first.
Other names: standard
FDG-PET-based small volume accelerated radiotherapy
Other names: Experimental
Time frame: approximately 22 weeks after start of radio-chemotherapy
To assess the feasibility of an FDG-PET-based small volume accelerated chemoradiotherapy followed by immunotherapy with durvalumab compared to standard FDG-PET-based chemoradiotherapy followed by immunotherapy with durvalumab Completion rate defined as rate of patients having received:
Time frame: up to 78 weeks
To assess the safety and tolerability of an FDGPET- based small volume accelerated chemoradiotherapy followed by immunotherapy with durvalumab compared to standard FDG-PET-based chemoradiotherapy followed by immunotherapy with durvalumab
Occurrence of adverse events and serious events:
Time frame: time from randomization to progression in the primary tumor or any of mediastinal lymph nodes, up to 143,5 weeks
Assess efficacy of FDG-PET-based smallvolumeaccelerated CRT followed by immunotherapy compared to standard FDG-PET-based CRT followed by immunotherapy in terms of time to locoreg. progression, time to locoreg. in- and out-of-RTfield progress
Time frame: time from rando to progression in primary tumor or mediastinal lymph nodes within the target volume, up to 143,5 weeks
Assess efficacy of FDG-PET-based smallvolumeaccelerated CRT followed by immunotherapy compared to standard FDG-PET-based CRT followed by immunotherapy in terms of time to locoreg. progression, time to locoreg. in- and out-of-RTfield progress
· Time to locoregional in-RT-field progression
Time frame: time from rando to progression in mediastinal lymph nodes outside the target volume, up to 143,5 weeks
Assess efficacy of FDG-PET-based smallvolumeaccelerated CRT followed by immunotherapy compared to standard FDG-PET-based CRT followed by immunotherapy in terms of time to locoreg. progression, time to locoreg. in- and out-of-RTfield progress
· Time to locoregional out-of-RT-field progression
Time frame: time from rando to appearance of metastases elsewhere, up to 143,5 weeks
Assess efficacy of FDG-PET-based smallvolumeaccelerated CRT followed by immunotherapy compared to standard FDG-PET-based CRT followed by immunotherapy in terms of time to locoreg. progression, time to locoreg. in- and out-of-RTfield progress
· Time to distant progression time from rando to appearance of metastases elsewhere
Time frame: time from rando to disease progression or death by any cause, up to 143,5 weeks
Assess efficacy of FDG-PET-based smallvolumeaccelerated CRT followed by immunotherapy compared to standard FDG-PET-based CRT followed by immunotherapy in terms of time to locoreg. progression, time to locoreg. in- and out-of-RTfield progress
· PFS
Time frame: time from rando to death by any cause, up to 143,5 weeks
Assess efficacy of FDG-PET-based smallvolumeaccelerated CRT followed by immunotherapy compared to standard FDG-PET-based CRT followed by immunotherapy in terms of time to locoreg. progression, time to locoreg. in- and out-of-RTfield progress
· OS
Time frame: Objective response rate defined as the proportion of randomized patients with best response of complete or partial response, up to 143,5 weeks
Assess efficacy of FDG-PET-based smallvolumeaccelerated CRT followed by immunotherapy compared to standard FDG-PET-based CRT followed by immunotherapy in terms of time to locoreg. progression, time to locoreg. in- and out-of-RTfield progress
· ORR
Time frame: Disease control rate defined as the proportion of rando patients with best response of complete response, partial response, or stable disease, up to 143,5 weeks
Assess efficacy of FDG-PET-based smallvolumeaccelerated CRT followed by immunotherapy compared to standard FDG-PET-based CRT followed by immunotherapy in terms of time to locoreg. progression, time to locoreg. in- and out-of-RTfield progress
· DCR
Time frame: up to 143,5 weeks
Assess symptoms and patient-reported QoL in patients receiving an FDG-PET-based smallvolumeaccelerated CRT followed by immunotherapy compared to patients receiving standard FDG-PET-based CRT followed by immunotherapy
The results of the questionnaire are usually presented as scale scores, ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the symptom scales indicate a worse quality of life.
Time frame: up to 143,5 weeks
Assess symptoms and patient-reported QoL in patients receiving an FDG-PET-based smallvolumeaccelerated CRT followed by immunotherapy compared to patients receiving standard FDG-PET-based CRT followed by immunotherapy
The results of the questionnaire are usually presented as scale scores, ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the functional scales indicate a better quality of life.
Time frame: up to 143,5 weeks
Assess symptoms and patient-reported QoL in patients receiving an FDG-PET-based smallvolumeaccelerated CRT followed by immunotherapy compared to patients receiving standard FDG-PET-based CRT followed by immunotherapy
The results of the questionnaire are usually presented as scale scores, ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the global health and quality of life scale indicate a better quality of life.
Time frame: up to 55 months
Percentage of patients without major protocol deviations regarding radiotherapy quality
Time frame: time from randomization to disease progression or death by any cause, up to 143,5 weeks
Quantifiable imaging parameters (e.g., SUV) will be correlated to response and survival outcomes, reflected in separate protocol to be setup
SUV is a common unitless measurement for radioactivity uptake. In the study we will measure maximum SUV and mean SUV from tumor volume. The tumor volume with the unit millilitre will be measured by an automatic segmentation were any area with SUV above a threshold value of 40% of SUVmax will be attributed to the tumor volume. These imaging parameters will be correlated with time to progression from randomization
Time frame: time from randomization to disease progression or death by any cause, up to 143,5 weeks
Quantifiable imaging parameters (e.g., SUV) will be correlated to response and survival outcomes, reflected in separate protocol to be setup
SUV is a common unitless measurement for radioactivity uptake. In the study we will measure maximum SUV and mean SUV from tumor volume. The tumor volume with the unit millilitre will be measured by an automatic segmentation were any area with SUV above a threshold value of 40% of SUVmax will be attributed to the tumor volume. These parameters will be correlated with time to progression from randomization Also, for changes of measurements of SUVmax and SUVmax from baseline correlation will be done with time to progression. In this analyisis also changes in tumor diameter (measured from CT) and changes in tumor volume (measured from PET) will be included into the analysis.
Time frame: time from randomization to disease progression or death by any cause, up to 143,5 weeks
Quantifiable imaging parameters (e.g., SUV) will be correlated to response and survival outcomes, reflected in separate protocol to be setup
SUV is a common unitless measurement for radioactivity uptake. In the study we will measure maximum SUV and mean SUV from tumor volume. The tumor volume with the unit millilitre will be measured by an automatic segmentation were any area with SUV above a threshold value of 40% of SUVmax will be attributed to the tumor volume. These imaging parameters will be correlated with time to progression from randomization Further changes of measurements of SUVmax, SUVmax, tumor diameter and tumor volume from end of chemoradiation therapy will be correlated with time to progression in the subgroup receiving three PET/CT scans.
Time frame: up to 55 months
Relation of NLR to response and survival outcomes, reflected in separate protocol to be setup
It is calculated by dividing the number of neutrophils by number of lymphocytes.
Time frame: up to 55 months
Relation of ALI Index (Advance lung cancer inflammation) to response and survival outcomes, reflected in separate protocol to be setup
ALI is calculated as (BMI x Alb / NLR) where BMI = body mass index, Alb = serum albumin, NLR (neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, a marker of systemic inflammation).
Time frame: up to 55 months
Relation of EDIC to immunomarkers (NLR), reflected in separate protocol to be setup
The EDIC model considers the exposure of circulating immune cells as the proportion of blood flow to lung, heart, liver, and the volume of the exposed area of the body, with the basis of mean lung dose, mean heart dose, mean liver dose and integral dose of the body region which are to be extracted from the RT plan. EDIC will be calculated as described in Xu et al. 2020.
NLR is calculated by dividing the number of neutrophils by number of lymphocytes.
Time frame: up to 55 months
Relation of EDIC to immunomarkers (ALI), reflected in separate protocol to be setup
The EDIC model considers the exposure of circulating immune cells as the proportion of blood flow to lung, heart, liver, and the volume of the exposed area of the body, with the basis of mean lung dose, mean heart dose, mean liver dose and integral dose of the body region which are to be extracted from the RT plan. EDIC will be calculated as described in Xu et al. 2020.
ALI is calculated as (BMI x Alb / NLR) where BMI = body mass index, Alb = serum albumin, NLR (neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, a marker of systemic inflammation).
Time frame: up to 55 months
Relation of EDIC to response to chemoradio-immunotherapy, reflected in separate protocol to be setup
The EDIC model considers the exposure of circulating immune cells as the proportion of blood flow to lung, heart, liver, and the volume of the exposed area of the body, with the basis of mean lung dose, mean heart dose, mean liver dose and integral dose of the body region which are to be extracted from the RT plan. EDIC will be calculated as described in Xu et al. 2020.
Time frame: up to 55 months
Relation of EDIC to survival outcomes, reflected in separate protocol to be setup
The EDIC model considers the exposure of circulating immune cells as the proportion of blood flow to lung, heart, liver, and the volume of the exposed area of the body, with the basis of mean lung dose, mean heart dose, mean liver dose and integral dose of the body region which are to be extracted from the RT plan. EDIC will be calculated as described in Xu et al. 2020.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Bernhard Remes, Dr.
CONTACT
Sascha Herzer
CONTACT
TheraOp
Other
Acronym: PACCELIO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03822351
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Anaheim, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05361174
Bronchial Diseases, Bronchial Neoplasms
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06917573
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Alicante, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06082492
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Hilversum, Utrecht, Netherlands
View Trial Details