University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85721, United States
NCT Number: NCT04505904
This is a completed project which was initiated prior to January 18,2017
Background: Theoretical models of complicated grief (CG) suggest that maladaptive approach (e.g., perseverative proximity-seeking of the deceased) or avoidance (e.g., excessive avoidance of reminders) behaviors interfere with a person's ability to integrate the loss and recover from their loved one's death. Due in part to conflicting evidence, little mechanistic understanding of how these behaviors develop in grief exists. We sought to (1) identify behavioral differences between CG and non-CG groups based on implicit bias for grief-, deceased-, and social-related stimuli, and (2) test the role of the neuropeptide oxytocin in shaping approach/avoidance bias.
Methods: Widowed older adults with and without CG completed an approach/avoidance task measuring implicit bias for personalized, non-specific, grief-related, and other stimuli. In a double-blinded, randomized, counterbalanced design, each participant attended both an intranasal oxytocin session and a placebo session. Aims were to (1) identify differential effects of CG and stimulus type on implicit approach/avoidance bias [placebo session], and (2) investigate interactive effects of CG, stimulus type, and oxytocin vs. placebo on approach/avoidance bias [both sessions].
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me55 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tucson, Arizona, 85721, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Synthetic oxytocin spray, 24 IU per spray.
Placebo spray with no active ingredient.
Time frame: 120 minutes
Participants completed the approach avoid task twice per session, with reversed instructions on the second run (i.e., "pull for yellow" became "push for yellow"). Each seven-minute run of the task consisted of 144 2500ms trials (288 trials per visit, 576 trials total across runs/sessions; 500ms inter-trial-interval). Order of instructions (i.e., "push yellow" vs. "pull yellow") was randomized and counterbalanced across participants and sessions, to address potential for order effects/habituation. Stimuli were presented via Inquisit 4 (2014), in a pseudorandomized order determined by genetic algorithm (Wager & Nichols, 2003).
Relative approach/avoidance bias was computed by subtracting median response time (RT; latency to joystick full extension) on PULL/approach trials in each stimulus category from PUSH/avoid trials in the same category (Rinck & Becker, 2007). Positive response bias values indicate relative approach bias; negative values indicate relative avoidance bias.
University of Arizona
Other
A Pull to be Close: the Differentiating Effects of Oxytocin and Grief Stimulus Type on Approach Behavior in Complicated Grief
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04694807
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Aarhus C, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05365139
Mental Disorders, Prolonged Grief Disorder
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05575817
Mental Disorders, Prolonged Grief Disorder
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04409821
COVID, COVID-19
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial Details