Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06016439

Outcomes of Massive Rotator Cuff Tendon Tear Treatment.

Rotator cuff tear is the leading cause of shoulder pain in the elderly. There isn't enough evidence nor clinical guidelines to guide the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears, specially irreparable tears. Arthroscopic partial repair has been widely used and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), either with allograft, autograft or augmentation with long head biceps brachii tendon (LHBBT), has been recently added. It is showing promising results, but lacking high quality evidence.

This is a prospective clinical study to compare the outcomes of different surgical methods for massive rotator cuff tendon tears. Minimal follow-up time will be two years. In this trial, massive rotator cuff tears will be anatomically repaired if possible. For irreparable tears a method will be randomly assigned intra-operatively once a tear is determined to be irreparable - either partial repair or partial repair with superior capsular reconstruction using the long head biceps brachii (LHBB) tendon. Patients who are eligible for the study but refuse operative treatment, will serve as conservative study group.

The hypothesis is that massive rotator cuff tears that are reparable will have the best functional outcomes. For irreparable tears, augmentation with LHBBT will give superior results over partial repair.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

50 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Patients with massive rotator cuff tendon tears aged between 50 to 80 years will be included in the study following the eligibility criteria. Massive tear is defined as grade III tear according to Davidson and Burkhart classification (2010), supraspinatus (SSP) tendon retraction described by Patte (1990) classification.

The study is conducted in Tartu University Hospital Sports Traumatology Centre and rotator cuff repair procedures will be done by three orthopaedic surgeons with long experience in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

It is determined intra-operatively whether the tear is reparable or not. If possible, the tendon(s) will be anatomically repaired. For irreparable tears intra-operative urn randomization takes place - either partial repair or partial repair with SCR using the LHBB tendon. Surgical techniques will be standardized. Patients who refuse operative treatment, will be followed as conservative treatment group.

The primary objective of the study is the functional status of the included subjects in different treatment groups. The secondary objective of the study is to confirm whether the tendons are intact on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after operation using Sugaya classification (2007).

The post-operative therapy regimen will be the same for each study group. Subjects will come for scheduled visits at 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month timepoints. Assessment tools consist of range of motion (ROM), strength measurements, preoperative radiography measuring acromio-humeral index (AHI), critical shoulder angle (CSA), acromion type and shoulder arthrosis (Hamada), functional scores: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), The Constant-Murley score (CMS), The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and visual analogue scale (VAS), also including Tampa kinesiophobia score and emotional well-being (EEK) score. Goutallier classification (1994) will be used pre- and postoperatively to measure muscle fatty infiltration.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Massive rotator cuff tendon tear: grade III according to Davidson and Burkhart 2010 classification, diagnosed on MRI, and LHBB tendon is intact.
  • Primary rotator cuff pathology AND
  • Symptoms have not lasted more than 6 months.
  • In case of trauma, traumatic event no more than 6 months ago.
  • Aged between 50 and 80 at the time of enrollment.
  • Subject is able and willing to give informed consent AND
  • Subject is physically and mentally willing and able to comply with the post-operative rehabilitation protocol, questionnaires, and scheduled clinical and radiographic visits.

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous rotator cuff surgery of the index shoulder.
  • Acute or chronic osteomyelitis.
  • Inflammatory joint disease (rheumatoid arthritis/ (pseudo)gout arthritis).
  • Uncontrolled diabetes.
  • Active oncological disease.
  • Radiologically stage IV shoulder joint arthrosis (rotator cuff arthropathy).
  • Systemic or intra-articular corticosteroid therapy less than 60 days prior to planned operation date.
  • Intramuscular or peroral corticosteroid treatment less than 30 days prior to planned operation date.
  • Acute or chronic conditions that are contraindications for functional testing.
  • MRI contraindicated.
  • Substance or alcohol abuse.
  • Refusal or withdrawal of consent.

Treatment and study plan

Arthroscopic rotator cuff partial repair with superior capsular augmentation with LHBBT

Procedure

Residual rotator cuff defect will be reconstructed using LHBBT.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff partial repair

Procedure

Rotator cuff will be repaired with remaining residual defect.

Arthroscopic complete rotator cuff repair

Procedure

Arthroscopic complete repair as a standard procedure.

Suture anchor(s)

Device

Arthroscopic rotator cuff tendon(s) repair using suture anchor(s).

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in shoulder strength

    Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit

    Measured by the change in rotator cuff strength isokinetic testing (abduction, internal and external rotation).

  2. Change in shoulder range of motion.

    Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit

    Measured by the change in shoulder range of motion (abduction, internal and external rotation).

  3. Functional outcome according to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score.

    Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit

    Measured by the change in joint functional score.

    The higher the score, the better the outcome.

    The patient self-assessment (pASES) includes 6 pain items and 10 functional items that are shoulder specific (Angst, 2008).

    The pASES form has 3 sections: pain, instability, activities of daily living (ADLs) (Goldhahn, 2008).

    Pain section: 4 questions with yes/no responses, 1 question covering number of pain tablets per day, and a VAS (visual analogue scale) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

    Instability section: 2 questions (1. Response yes/no about feelings of instability, 2. Quantify instability from 0 (stable) to 10 (very unstable)).

    Activities of daily living (ADLs): Each shoulder is included (affected/non affected), 10 items, with a 4 point ordinal scale, range: 0 (unable to perform activity) to 3 (no difficulty in doing activity) (Goldhahn 2008).

  4. Functional outcome according to the Constant-Murley score (CMS).

    Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit

    Measured by the change in joint functional score.

    The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function.

    The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (ADL) (20 points), strength (25 points) and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (40 points).

  5. Functional outcome according to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH).

    Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit

    Measured by the change in joint functional score.

    The higher the score, the more severe disability.

    30-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess symptoms and function of the entire upper extremity.

    Total scores range from 0 (minimum) to (100) maximum.

  6. Change in pain score

    Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit

    Measured by the change in pain score according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Integrity of surgically repaired rotator cuff tendons on MRI studies using Sugaya classification (2005).

    Time frame: postoperatively 6 months, 12 months and 24 months

    Integrity of surgically repaired rotator cuff tendons on post-operative MRI studies.

    Classified into five categories (from intact tendon to full tear):

    Type I: sufficient thickness with homogeneously low intensity; Type II: sufficient thickness with partial high intensity; Type III: insufficient thickness without discontinuity; Type IV: the presence of a minor discontinuity; Type V: the presence of a major discontinuity.

  2. Change in quality of life

    Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit

    Measured by the change in score according to EEK-2 (emotsionaalse enesetunde küsimustik, Emotional State Questionnaire) score.

    The higher the score, the higher the risk of having emotional state disabilities.

    The overall score ranges from 0-112, but it is divided into six categories that are assessed separately.

  3. Change in kinesiophobia score

    Time frame: Pre-operative baseline, 6-months, 12-months and 24-months follow-up visit

    Change in kinesiophobia score according to Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia.

    The higher the score, the higher the degree of kinesiophobia.

    Results consist of a total raw score (range between 17 and 68) and two subscale scores (activity avoidance and somatic focus).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Madis Rahu, PhD/MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Tiina Tikk, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

55929399 ext. +372

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tartu University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Tartu

Registry information

Official study title

Outcomes of Different Treatment Modalities for Massive Rotator Cuff Tendon Tear.

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2033
Study completion
2033
First posted
Aug 29, 2023
Registry last updated
Nov 24, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.