Assiut University Heart Hosiptal
Asyut, 711, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06811662
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of complete (preservation of both anterior and posterior leaflets) versus partial (preservation of posterior leaflet only) preservation of subvalvular apparatus in cases of mitral valve replacement
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Asyut, 711, Egypt
After mitral valve replacement (MVR), sudden increases in afterload and disruption of the annular-chordal-papillary-left-ventricular wall causes left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in the early postoperative period.
patients with LV dysfunction after MVR have a significantly lower 8-year survival rate compares with patients who did not have LV dysfunction Papillary muscles play an important role in the left ventricular contraction by drawing the mitral ring toward the apex, thereby causing shortening of the long axis and spherity of the chamber contribute for better ejection of blood.
preservation of papillary muscles and chordae tendineae in MVR reduces postoperative mortality, low cardiac output syndrome and improves haemodynamic function.
Partial preservation of the mitral apparatus through preservation of the posterior leaflet (MVR-P) has been proven to significantly reduce perioperative mortality.
The importance of complete preservation of the mitral apparatus remains controversial, but it is hypothesized that complete preservation with preservation of both the anterior and posterior leaflets may contribute to superior postoperative hemodynamic function as compared to partial preservation.
Due to the increased technical complexity of preserving both leaflets, concerns about longer bypass and cross-clamp times, the need to undersize prostheses, and the possibility of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, the majority of cardiac surgeons currently prefer to preserve the posterior leaflet alone.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
complete versus partial preservation of subvavular apparatus during mitral valve replacement
Time frame: anticepated 3 years
To evaluate the outcomes of complete versus partial preservation of subvalvular apparatus in mitral valve replacement regarding:
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Assiut University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07069673
Cardiovascular Diseases, Deglutition Disorders
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07314476
Acute Ischemic Stroke AIS, Aortic Valve Replacement
L’Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07601269
Mitral Valve Replacement
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT07438717
Mitral Valve Replacement
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details