Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Markus Schranz, Md
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06053554
The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of the two IOL implantation methods for eyes with cataract and PEX in a single-center and with highly experienced surgeons. The goal is to acquire relevant information regarding these two IOL implantation techniques, which will help surgeons to decide which approach to choose, ultimately resulting in a benefit for patients with PEX syndrome who require cataract surgery.
The main questions are:
Is there a difference in lens tilt and decentration between the both methods. Is there a difference in the frequency and amount of capsular phimosis between the both methods.
Interested in participating?
Request Info60 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Location status: Recruiting
Markus Schranz, Md
CONTACT
This is a prospective, intraindividual comparative study of two routinely used surgical techniques for IOL implantation in extracapsular cataract surgery. On the day baseline examination, the first eye to be operated is randomised to receive a 3p-IOL implantation in the capsular bag (group 1) or a 3p-IOL haptics in the ciliary sulcus with the IOL optic tucked in the capsular bag (group 2). The second eye to be operated receives the other method. The eye with the lower visual acuity is operated first, in case of identical visual acuity values the for the patient subjective worse eye is operated first. This procedure is clinical standard. Until the point of IOL implantation the surgery is identical in both methods and the surgeon is blinded.
Femtolaser is used to perform a standard 5.0mm CCC centred on the pupil or limbus and to fragment the lens nucleus to guarantee reproducible results in every eye. In case of an insufficient pupil size (smaller than 5.5mm), 2.4mm clear corneal incision and paracenteses are performed prior to laser docking and a pupil expansion device is implanted under anterior segment filling with viscoelastic to enlarge the pupil diameter. After the CCC and nucleus fragmentation the anterior segment is filled with viscoelastics, the rhexis lenticule is removed and hydrodisection of the nucleus is performed. Subsequently phacoemulsification for nucleus and irrigation/aspiration of the lens cortex is performed. The capsular bag and AC is then filled with a cohesive viscoelastic and the IOL is implanted as described above with the haptics in the back or with the haptics in the sulcus. At the end of surgery, the viscoelastic is removed using the irrigation aspiration probe, intracameral antibiotic is instilled, the CCI and paracenteses are hydrated and sealed.
Study investigators are blinded, however the selected method can be visible during the routinely performed slit-lamp examinations. During all evaluation and measuring processes (Evaluation of decentration, tilt, capsular phimoses, surgery time) the investigators are blinded. This study is performed by highly experienced surgeons, who have already performed both methods on a routine basis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Femtolaser is used to perform a standard 5.0mm CCC centred on the pupil or limbus and to fragment the lens nucleus toguarantee reproducible results in every eye.After the CCC and nucleus fragmentation the anterior segment is filled with viscoelastics, the rhexis lenticule is removed and hydrodisection of the nucleus is performed. Subsequently phacoemulsification for nucleus and irrigation/aspiration of the lens cortex is performed. The capsular bag and AC is then filled with a cohesive viscoelastic and the IOL is implanted with the haptics in the back or with the haptics in the sulcus. At the end of surgery, the viscoelastic is removed using the irrigation aspiration probe, intracameral antibiotic is instilled, the CCI and paracenteses are hydrated and sealed.
The femto second laser used for certain steps (capsulorhexis, nucleus fragmentation) of the cataract surgery.
The used 3 piece intra ocular lens
Time frame: Baseline to month 60 postoperatively
The change of lens tilt and decentration from baseline to month 60 postoperatively, measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Time frame: Month 60 postoperatively
The difference in decentration and tilt between the "in the bag" and the sulcus intra ocular lens implantation method at month 60 post operatively, measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Time frame: Month 60 postoperatively
The amount of anterior capsular phimosis and rhexis shrinking, evaluated on anterior segment images.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Claudette ABELA-FORMANEK, Prof.Dr.
CONTACT
Markus Schranz, Dr.
CONTACT
Medical University of Vienna
Other
Outcome of Two Surgical Methods for IOLImplantation in Eyes With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome: Lens in the Bag-technique Versus Lens in the Ciliary Sulcus With Optic Capture Technique
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07395986
Age Related Cataracts, Cataract
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05822089
Age Related Cataracts
Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT07006428
Age Related Cataracts
Torrance, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03803852
Age Related Cataracts, Astigmatism
Vienna, State of Vienna, Austria
View Trial Details