osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM)
ProcedureAt each of the first three study visits, all subjects in the osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) group will receive OMM using the prescribed protocol.
NCT Number: NCT00520039
The purpose of this study is to determine if the application of osteopathic manipulative medicine speeds the rate of resolution of middle ear effusion (fluid) in children following an episode of acute otitis media.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me6 month–2 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Biddeford, Maine, United States
Acute otitis media is a significant world wide problem commonly affecting children between 6 and 18 months, and is the most frequent reason for childhood illness visits to a physician in the US. By three years of age, 50-70% of children will have had one episode, while one-third will have had more than three. Persistence of middle ear effusion following an episode of acute otitis media is thought to predispose the child to recurrent infection. The standard care for recurrent acute otitis media includes long term antibiotic prophylaxis and surgery. The risks of standard care are recognized, and alternative means of treating acute disease and preventing recurrent otitis media are needed.
For over a century, osteopathic physicians have reported favorable clinical outcomes in children treated with osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) in addition to standard medical care. To determine if a standardized OMM protocol will reduce the duration of middle ear effusion (MEE) after onset of acute otitis media, we outline a prospective, randomized, blinded, multi-center efficacy study of children ages six months to two years with a single episode of acute otitis media. Subjects will be randomized into one of two treatment groups: standard care plus OMM and standard care only. Subjects will be followed for one month to determine rate of resolution of middle ear effusion following onset of the acute otitis media. Statistical analysis will determine any differences between subjects in the two treatment groups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
At each of the first three study visits, all subjects in the osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) group will receive OMM using the prescribed protocol.
Time frame: 1 month
For this study, the tympanogram was chosen to measure middle ear effusion. Three tympanogram readings from each ear included in the study were taken at the beginning of each of 5 Study Visits. For the intervention group, a second set of 3 tympanograms was taken immediately after the OMM on Visits 1, 2 and 3. All tympanograms were sent to a blinded audiologist, who chose the most healthy of the 3 tympanogram readings for interpretation, rating it according to standard protocols. "A" and "C1" readings were considered "normal" and "B" and "C2" readings were considered "abnormal". The extent to which the tympanogram readings of each ear included in the study changed from baseline over 4 weeks was computed by crosstabulating the intervention group by the normal/abnormal changes in tympanograms.
Time frame: Before and immediately after OMM at study visit 2
For this study, the tympanogram was chosen to measure middle ear effusion. For the SC+OMT Group during study visit 2, three tympanogram readings from each ear included in the study were taken prior to, and immediately after the intervention. The tympanograms were sent to the blinded audiologist, who chose the most healthy of the 3 tympanogram readings for interpretation, rating it according to standard protocols. "A" and "C1" readings were considered "normal" and "B" and "C2" readings were considered "abnormal". The extent to which the tympanogram readings of each ear included in the study changed between "normal" and "abnormal" from before and after the OMM was computed.
Time frame: Before and immediately after OMM at study visit 3
For this study, the tympanogram was chosen to measure middle ear effusion. For the SC+OMT Group during study visit 3, three tympanogram readings from each ear included in the study were taken prior to, and immediately after the intervention. The tympanograms were sent to the blinded audiologist, who chose the most healthy of the 3 tympanogram readings for interpretation, rating it according to standard protocols. "A" and "C1" readings were considered "normal" and "B" and "C2" readings were considered "abnormal". The extent to which the tympanogram readings of each ear included in the study changed between "normal" and "abnormal" from before and after the OMM was computed.
West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine
Other
Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) on the Duration of Middle Ear Effusion in Children Following Diagnosis of Acute Otitis Media, as Measured by Tympanograms and Acoustic Reflectometry
Acronym: OOMRS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01202578
Acute Otitis Media, Ear Diseases
Port Saint Lucie, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02716376
Chronic Otitis Media, Ear Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT03848026
Ear Diseases, OTITIS MEDIA WITH EFFUSION
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT00393900
Ear Diseases, OTITIS MEDIA WITH EFFUSION
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details