Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06447844

OsteoGen Plug vs. Freeze-dried Bone Allograft With Collagen Barrier

The study will be a multi-site, randomized, two-arm, controlled clinical trial using OsteoGen® Plug (Test) vs Freeze-dried Bone Allograft with collagen barrier (Control) for alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in posterior extraction sites with intact buccal cortical plates.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

McClain and Schallhorn Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, Aurora, Colorado, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

After tooth extraction and debridement, sockets will be packed with either test product (OGP), or control product (BioGide). Subjects will then undergo follow-up assessments conducted at day 7 (+3 days), day 14 (+3 days), and day 30 (+3 days) for oral exam, PROs, AEs, and complication assessments. Subjects will undergo follow-up assessments conducted at day 60 (+3 days) and day 90 (+3 days), for oral exam, PROs, AEs, complication assessments, standardized PA radiographs. Subjects will undergo follow-up assessments conducted at day 120 (+3 days) for oral exam, PROs, AEs, complication assessments, standardized PA radiograph, intraoral scan, and CBCT.

OPTIONAL Subjects will undergo follow-up assessments conducted at day 135 (+14 days) for oral exam, AEs, complication assessments, histologic core procurement, additional grafting assessment, prosthetic driven implant placement assessment.

Subjects will undergo follow-up assessments conducted at day 143 (+5 days) for oral exam, AEs, end of study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects 18 to 75-yrs of age.
  • Subjects with a nonterminal premolar in need of extraction with intention to pursue implant replacement.
  • Proposed treatment site must have intact buccal cortical plates > 1 mm in thickness (buccal bone dehiscence up to 25% root length is permissible). Apical lesions are acceptable which do not perforate the cortical plate).
  • Proposed treatment site must have intact adjacent natural teeth. (no adjacent edentulous sites or implants).
  • Subjects can provide self-care (oral hygiene) without disabilities requiring assistance with daily oral hygiene measures.
  • Subjects will have read, understood, and signed an institutional review board (IRB) approved Informed Consent Form (ICF).
  • Subjects must be able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects with reported allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the products to be used in the study.
  • Subjects with untreated / active periodontal disease.
  • Subjects with vesiculobullous processes or other similar chronic oral lesions / conditions resulting in gingival irritation, discomfort/pain, or erosions.
  • Tobacco/Cannabis users including cigarettes, vape, cigars, or smokeless tobacco.
  • Uncontrolled medical conditions (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cancer)
  • Subjects who are lactating or pregnant or planning to become pregnant through their projected study duration.
  • Subjects who would require a tissue supported interim prosthesis i.e. acrylic / valplast RPD (tooth supported interim prostheses i.e. essix retainers are acceptable)
  • Subjects with long-term history of oral bisphosphonates (> 10 years).
  • Subjects with a history of intravenous bisphosphonates.
  • Subjects taking medications known to affect gingival conditions. (e.g., hyperplasia)
  • Subjects taking corticosteroids or immunosuppressants on a regular basis prior to baseline examination.
  • Subjects taking anticoagulant medications such as warfarin or Plavix or Eliquis who are not medically cleared to hold medication prior to and during procedure.
  • Subjects participating in other clinical studies involving therapeutic intervention (either medical or dental).
  • Subjects, who in the opinion of the investigator, for any reason other than those listed above, will not be able to complete the study per protocol.

Treatment and study plan

OsteoGen Plug

Device

OsteoGen® Plug is contoured to fill the three roots of the socket. Plug is delivered dry into a thoroughly debrided and actively bleeding socket. The OsteoGen® Plug is condensed firmly into the socket.

Biogide

Device

BioGide is a resorbable collagen membrane

Primary outcomes

  1. New bone formation

    Time frame: 120 days

    new bone formation will be determined by Cone Beam Cat Scan (CBCT) at Day 120

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in ridge height compared to screening as determined by Cone Beam Cat Scan (CBCT)

    Time frame: 120 days

    two CBCTs will be compared, one from screening, the other at 120 days.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in ridge width compared to screening at 3mm and 5mm below crest

    Time frame: 120 days

    two CBCTs will be compared, one from screening, the other at 120 days.

  2. Volumetric analysis of soft tissue/ridge height and width via intraoral scans

    Time frame: 120 days

    Intraoral scans will be compared to baseline, pre-surgery and 120 days.

  3. Histologic assessment of NBF (new bone formation), RG (residual graft particle) and connective tissue at 4 months if implant is placed

    Time frame: 4 months post implant placement

    histology samples will be collected 4 months post implant placement for analysis on bone growth,

  4. wound closure assessment

    Time frame: 120 days

    wound closure will be assessed at all post surgical visits.

  5. number of treatment sites requiring additional grafting at time of implant placement

    Time frame: During procedure (time of implant placement)

    oral exam of dentition to determine if any additional grafting is needed to treatment sites.

  6. cost effectiveness analysis

    Time frame: 120 days

    comparison of experimental procedure vs. standard treatment.

  7. baseline buccal plate thickness influence on outcomes

    Time frame: 120 days

    buccal plate thickness documented by CBCT will be compared to outcomes.

  8. change in phenotype

    Time frame: 120 days

    the change in soft and hard tissue thickness supporting structures of the teeth.

  9. time comparison between treatment groups from post extraction to ARP procedure completion (final suture)

    Time frame: surgical visit

    time will be document for both arms from start of surgery to last suture being placed

  10. Change in ridge width compared to screening at crest as determined by CBCT. Change in ridge width compared to baseline screening at crest as determined by CBCT. Change in ridge width compared to screening at crest as determined by CBCT.

    Time frame: 120 days

    two CBCTs will be compared, one from screening, the other at 120 days.

  11. complication type and incidence rates

    Time frame: 120 days

    complications will be collected at all visits post surgery

  12. Prosthetic driven implant feasibility assessment

    Time frame: 120 days

    a determination if implant could have been placed without additional grafting.

  13. Safety and tolerability/biocompatibility:Adverse events

    Time frame: 120 days

    adverse events will be collected from baseline visit through end of study

  14. Patient demographics and robust health history influence outcomes

    Time frame: 120 days

    patient demographics will be collected at screening and compared to outcomes at Day 120

  15. Patient reported outcomes (pain, satisfaction)

    Time frame: 120 days

    PROs will be collected from baseline to day 120 to determine level of pain on a scale from 1 (no discomfort) to 10 (as much discomfort as i have ever felt) and satisfaction on a scale of 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied).

  16. Clinician reported outcomes for usability (ease of use, time for each graft procedure, site vascularity)

    Time frame: visit 2 post surgery

    clinicians will be asked to provide their opinions on useability of each product. Ease of use scale 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) and vascularity rating from 1 (avascular blood flow) to 5 (blood flow readily apparent without cortical penetration)

  17. Long term implant assessments

    Time frame: post implant placement (outside of study after 120 days)

    optional assessment if an implant is placed at some point in the future.Details not yet specified.

  18. histology cores if implant placement in future

    Time frame: post implant placement (outside of study after 120 days)

    optional additional histology assessments may be done if implant is placed at some point in the future.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

McGuire Institute

Industry

Collaborators

  • Impladent LTD

Registry information

Official study title

OsteoGen® Plug vs Freeze-dried Bone Allograft With Collagen Barrier for Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jun 7, 2024
Registry last updated
May 29, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.