Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01613144

OsseoScrew Versus Fenestrated Pedicle Screws Augmented With Polymethylmethacrylate

The purpose of this clinical investigation was to collect clinical evidence of the safety and efficacy of the OsseoScrew System. The OsseoScrew System is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion. The study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of OsseoScrew compared to any other commercially available fenestrated pedicle screw system augmented with PMMA for posterior spinal fixation after surgical correction of spinal deformity or pathology.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

O.L. Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This was a randomized, open-label, controlled, multi-center study in which patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the OsseoScrew or any commercially available fenestrated screw augmented with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) (Control group) for posterior spinal fixation after surgical correction of spinal deformity or pathology. The study was planned to include up to 150 skeletally mature patients with spinal instability and osteopenia at up to 10 sites. Patients were to return postoperatively at 6 weeks (± 2 weeks) and at 6, 12, and 24 months (± 2 months) for assessments.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Spinal instability or deformity requiring fusion with instrumentation
  • Osteopenia defined as (T-Score of less than -1.0)
  • No response to nonoperative treatment modalities preceding enrollment.
  • Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent and agrees to release medical information for purposes of this study and to return for scheduled follow-up evaluations

Exclusion criteria

  • Active systemic or local infection
  • A life expectancy less than the study duration
  • Autoimmune disorders
  • Currently an alcohol, solvent, or drug abuser
  • Psychiatric or cognitive impairment that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the study requirements
  • History of allergies to any of the device components including but not limited to commercially pure titanium, titanium alloy, polymethylmethacrylate or Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2)

Treatment and study plan

OsseoScrew Spinal Fixation System

Device

Surgical intervention

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety Endpoint: Rate of device-related or PMMA-related complications

    Time frame: 24 months

    The proportion of patients who were free from device-related or PMMA-related complications leading to revision, supplemental fixation, non-elective removal, or reoperation throughout the study. Complications included, but were not limited to device or PMMA fracture, device or PMMA-related loosening, device or PMMA-related device disassembly, device migration or PMMA extravasation.

  2. Efficacy Endpoint: Successful radiographic fusion

    Time frame: 24 months

    Presence of continuous bridging bone across the implant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index

    Time frame: 24 months

    This is a measure of the patient's self reported permanent functional disability. Each section is scored on a 1-5 scale with 5 representing the greatest disability.

  2. Visual Analogue Scale for back pain

    Time frame: 24 months

    This is a measure of the characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values to measure pain intensity. The range of score is from 0 - 100. The patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

  3. Adverse events

    Time frame: 24 months

    Adverse event rates

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Alphatec Spine, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Expandable Pedicle Screws Versus Fenestrated Pedicle Screws Augmented With Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA): Complications and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Osteoporosis or Poor Bone Quality

Acronym: EVOLVE

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Jun 7, 2012
Registry last updated
Feb 25, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.