Carmen García Gomariz
Valencia, 46010, Spain
NCT Number: NCT07378917
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an external corrector in realigning the first metatarsophalangeal joint in patients with mild to moderate Hallux Abducto Valgus, according to the Manchester scale. Changes in valgus angle will be assessed through radiographs, along with pain, comfort and adherence, comparing results with a control group.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Valencia, 46010, Spain
Introduction and Rationale Hallux Abducto Valgus (HAV) is the most common forefoot deformity, often associated with pain and functional limitations. Its development is multifactorial, and although surgical and conservative treatments exist, evidence regarding the real effectiveness of corrective orthopedic devices in early stages is scarce. This study seeks to provide scientific rigor to a device frequently recommended in clinical practice by evaluating its ability to correct alignment and improve symptoms.
Main and Secondary Objectives The primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of the corrector in realigning the first toe by measuring the valgus angle radiographically at three time points: without the corrector, immediately after application, and after 3 months. Secondary objectives include evaluating pain (VAS), comfort, adherence, device fit, changes in plantar pressure (static and dynamic), patient satisfaction, and differences compared to the control group.
Study Design and Population This is an experimental study involving a group of 35 subjects diagnosed with mild or moderate HAV according to the Manchester scale, recruited at the Aquilesia podiatry clinic (Vila-real, Castelló). Recruitment will be carried out through local media, social networks, and referrals from healthcare professionals. Informed consent, anonymity, and compliance with data protection regulations will be ensured.
Intervention and Measurements The intervention consists of applying an external hallux alignment corrector. Three radiographic measurements of the metatarsophalangeal angle will be taken: baseline, after corrector placement, and at 3 months. Additional data will include pain, comfort, adherence and device adjustment. Standardized scales (VAS, satisfaction questionnaires) and Excel-based data recording will be used.
Data Processing and Analysis Data will be collected by a podiatrist and anonymized before analysis. Intra- and intergroup differences will be evaluated using appropriate statistical tests, considering variables such as sex, age, and degree of deformity. The study aims to determine whether the corrector produces significant improvements in alignment and other clinical parameters, providing evidence for its usefulness in podiatric practice.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This study evaluates the effectiveness of an external hallux valgus orthosis in realigning the first metatarsophalangeal joint in patients with mild to moderate HAV. Two radiographic measurements of the valgus angle will be taken: at baseline and after 3 months of daily orthosis use. Participants will receive instructions for proper placement and adjustment. Secondary outcomes include pain (VAS), comfort, satisfaction, plantar pressure analysis (static/dynamic), device fit, and adherence. Data will be collected by podiatrists and anonymized for analysis.
Time frame: 3 months
Measurement of the hallux valgus angle on digital radiographs at baseline and after 3 months of orthosis use, to determine the degree of realignment of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.
Time frame: 3 months
Evaluation of pain intensity in the hallux region using the Visual Analog Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain).
Time frame: 3 months
Subjective assessment of comfort, aesthetics, and overall satisfaction with the orthosis through a structured questionnaire.
Comfort was evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no comfort and 10 indicates maximum comfort.
Time frame: 1day
Evaluation of orthosis sizing and traction adjustment scored on a 1-10 scale, including ease of placement by the participant.
Time frame: 3 months
Assessment of wear and tear of the device after 3 months, scored on a 1-10 scale.
Time frame: 3 months
Monitoring of daily orthosis use through self-reported logs and follow-up visits.
Time frame: 3 months
Whether the participant would consider buying the orthosis after the study (Yes/No).
University of Valencia
Other
Evaluation of Metatarsophalangeal Joint Alignment in Mild and Moderate Hallux Abducto Valgus Through Orthotic Intervention
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07052721
Ankle Arthropathy, Clavicle Fracture
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05101499
Akin Osteotomy, Foot Deformities
Paris, IDF, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02984462
Foot Deformities, Hallux Valgus
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07589829
Foot Deformities, Hallux Valgus
Kayseri, Kocasinan, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details