Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03152188

Oral Fecal Transplant in Cirrhosis

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of oral fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1

Primary location

Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Hepatic encephalopathy affects 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis and adversely affects survival in these patients. The mainstay of treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has long been the manipulation of the gut microbiota through antibiotics, prebiotics or probiotics. The current first and second line therapies for HE in the US are lactulose and rifaximin respectively that uniquely act within the confines of the gut lumen with encouraging clinical results. However there is a subset of patients with HE that continues to recur despite being on both treatments. This patient group is at a higher risk of poor outcomes because HE has now been removed from liver transplant priority and multiple episodes of HE can result in cumulative brain injury which may be irreversible. Therefore the prevention of recurrent HE is an important therapeutic goal.

The study team's research and other reports have shown that patients with HE and cirrhosis are more likely to have overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of autochthonous species such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in the stool and the colonic mucosa. This has been linked to poor performance on cognitive tests that are a hallmark of HE and with increased systemic inflammation in these patients.

Therefore a gut-based therapeutic option that can potentially improve the recurrence rate and the overall prognosis is needed. Fecal transplant has been shown to be effective in conditions with predominant gut-bacterial overgrowth or alteration such as recurrent Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Safe protocols have been developed across the world and studies are being performed in the US under FDA-monitored INDs. Limitations to performing fecal transplant include identifying and screening appropriate donors, which is time consuming and costly, with the cost typically falling to the patient or donor as the required screening is generally not covered by insurance. For this reason, the study team is particularly interested in working with Openbiome and have obtained their collaboration towards performing this Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) by cross-referencing of their drug master file.

The preliminary data suggest that a one-time administration of an FMT-enema using a rationally-selected donor via Openbiome is safe in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent HE. However, given the small bowel overgrowth and the predominantly small bowel location for bacterial translocation in cirrhosis, which is out of the reach of an enema, an upper GI route for FMT needs to be explored. The FMT capsule by Openbiome acts on the small and large intestine and is available for C.difficile. It is potentially more acceptable to patients for repeated administrations and in cirrhosis has the advantage of acting on the small bowel in addition to the large bowel. The study will use a donor specifically selected from the Openbiome pool whose microbial profile best fulfils the microbiota deficits related to beneficial bacteria in HE patients, utilizing a "Precision Microbiome" approach.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 21-75 years of age
  • Cirrhosis diagnosed by either of the following in a patient with chronic liver disease (a) Liver Biopsy (b) Radiologic evidence of varices, cirrhosis or portal hypertension (c) Laboratory evidence of platelet count <100,000 or AST/ALT ratio>1 (d) Endoscopic evidence of varices or portal gastropathy
  • At least two HE episodes, one within the last year but not within the last month (patient can be on lactulose and rifaximin)
  • Able to give written, informed consent (mini-mental status exam>25 at the time of consenting)

Exclusion criteria

Disease-related: (1) MELD score>17 (2) WBC count<1000 (3) TIPS, non-elective hospitalization or HE within last month (4) on dialysis (5) known untreated, in-situ luminal GI cancers (6) chronic intrinsic GI diseases (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease or microscopic colitis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis and celiac disease) Endoscopy-related: (1) Platelet count<50,000 (2) adverse reactions to sedation (3) lack of driver or other contra-indications Safety-related: (1) Dysphagia (2) History of aspiration, gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction (3) Ongoing absorbable antibiotic use (4) Severe anaphylactic food allergy (5) allergy to ingredients Generally Recognized As Safe in the G3 capsules (glycerol, sodium chloride, hypromellose, gellan gum, titanium dioxide, theobroma oil) (6) Adverse event attributable to prior FMT (7) ASA Class IV or V (8) Pregnant or nursing patients (9) acute illness or fever on the day of planned FMT

Treatment and study plan

FMT

Drug

Fifteen FMT Openbiome capsules administered at the same time

Placebo

Other

Fifteen placebo capsules administered at the same time

Primary outcomes

  1. Serious Adverse events related to FMT

    Time frame: 5 months

    Safety

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency, severity and relatedness of solicited and unsolicited AEs

    Time frame: 5 months

    Safety

  2. Occurrence of new potentially transmitted infections in the FMT group

    Time frame: 5 months

    Safety

  3. Occurrence of new onset or significant worsening of chronic medical conditions post-FMT

    Time frame: 5 months

    Safety

  4. changes in microbiota composition of the stool, duodenal and sigmoid colonic mucosa after oral FMT compared to pre-FMT baseline and donor compared to placebo post-FMT

    Time frame: 30 days

    Mechanism

  5. mucosal defenses by studying antimicrobial peptides, inflammatory cytokine expression and barrier protein expression compared to pre-FMT baseline and compared to placebo

    Time frame: 30 days

    Mechanism

  6. cognitive function after oral FMT compared to pre-FMT baseline and compared to placebo

    Time frame: 30 days

    Mechanism

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Virginia Commonwealth University

Other

Collaborators

  • Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  • OpenBiome

Registry information

Official study title

Modulation of Gut-Brain Axis Using Fecal Transplant Capsules in Cirrhosis

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
May 12, 2017
Registry last updated
May 19, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.