Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03357718

Oral Dexmedetomidine vs Midazoam For Premedication

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of 2 µg/kg of oral dexmedetomidine (DEX) and 0.5 mg/kg dormicum as premedication among children undergoing dental procedures.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

3 year–7 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

About this study

The study involved 52 children between 3-7 years of age, ASA I , who underwent full-mouth dental rehabilitation. The DEX group (n=26) received 2 µg/kg DEX in apple juice, and the control group (n=26) received 0.5 mg/kg midazolam in apple juice.

The patients' scores on the Ramsey sedation scale (RSS), parental separation anxiety scale, mask acceptance scale, post-anesthesia emergence delirium scale (PAEDS), and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. The data were analyzed using chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, student t test, and analysis of variance in SPSS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The inclusion criteria is age between 3 to 7 years and American Society og Anesthesiology (ASA) grade 1.

Exclusion criteria

  • The exclusion criteria included congenital disease, DEX, propofol allergy, asthma, mental retardation and those children parents refuse to participate study.

Treatment and study plan

Precedex

Drug

2 µg/kg oral

Other names: Dexmedetomidine

midazolam

Drug

0.5 mg/kg

Other names: Dormicum

Primary outcomes

  1. Ramsey Sedation Scale

    Time frame: 45 minutes after premedication

    Sedation level is evaluated due to patient behavior. 1= Patient is anxious and agitated or restless or both, 2=Patient is cooperative, oriented, and tranquil, 3=Patient responds to command only, 4=Patient exhibits brisk response to light glabellar tap, 5=Patient exhibits sluggish response to light glabellar tap, 6=Patient exhibits no response.A Ramsay sedation score '1' was considered as unsatisfactory and "≥ 2" was considered as satisfactory sedation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Parental Separation Anxiety Scale

    Time frame: Preoperative

    Behavior of the child on seperation from the parents was assessed according to a four-point scale, i.e., the parental seperation anxiety scale (PSAS): 1= Easy seperation, 2=Whimpers but easily reassured, 3=Cries and cannot be easily reassured, but not clinging to parents, 4=Cries and clinging to parents. A PSAS score of 1 and 2 were considered as 'successful parental seperation'.

  2. Mask Acceptance Score

    Time frame: Before induction

    Mask acceptance was evaluated using a four-point scale, i.e., mask acceptance scale (MAS):

    1=Excellent (unafraid, cooperative, and accepts mask easily), 2=Good (slight fear of mask , easily reassured), 3=Fair (moderate fear of mask, not calmed with reassurance), 4=Poor (terrified, crying, or combative). The score of 1 and 2 considered as 'satisfactory' mask acceptance.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Oral Dexmedetomidine vs Midazoam For Premedication And Emergence Delirium in Children Undergoing Dental Treatment

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Nov 30, 2017
Registry last updated
May 29, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.