Monobloc
DeviceConstruction fitted to upper and lower jaw
Other names: Mandibular protruding device
NCT Number: NCT02148510
The hypothesis of the study is that a bibloc-apnea splint has a comparable efficacy on respiratory measures as a monobloc-apnea splint and that the cost of treatment is the same. The goal is primarily to compare the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) after 6 weeks of treatment and the cost of treatment during one year.
This randomized controlled parallel group multicenter study includes 316 subjects referred for the treatment of moderate to severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). The subjects visit the clinic at 5 scheduled occasions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Västmanland County Hospitals, Västerås, Västmanland County, Sweden
The study includes 2 arms. Secondary measures are obtained by respiratory analysis and questionnaires. Electromyography (EMG) of the masseter muscle is recorded and the influence of bruxism is evaluated in terms effect on efficacy and adverse events
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Construction fitted to upper and lower jaw
Other names: Mandibular protruding device
Biblock construction
Other names: Narval
Time frame: 9 weeks after start of study
AHI defined by American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM)
Time frame: 9 weeks
Number of episodes per hour with arterial oxygen saturation decline of 3% or more
Time frame: 9 weeks and 1 year
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
Time frame: 9 weeks and 1 year
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ )
Time frame: 9 weeks
Bruxism episodes during sleep
Time frame: 1 year
Subject reported and objective investigator observed events
Time frame: 1 year
Total cost calculation including the device, repairs and adjustments and consumption of dentist time
Uppsala University
Other
Oral Appliance in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A Randomized Controlled Blinded Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy of Two Devices
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04950894
Apnea, Apnea+Hypopnea
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04875364
Apnea, Dyssomnias
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05197855
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Grenoble, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06540716
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Singapore
View Trial Details