Options for Navigating Talking About Risk and Adolescent Choices

A calendar assisted daily substance use estimation method obtained by interview. Days used will serve as primary outcome. More days used represent more substance use.

Assesses self-efficacy to resist alcohol use. Scores range from 9 to 54. Higher scores represent greater drinking refusal self-efficacy.

Assesses self-efficacy to resist marijuana use. Scores range from 9 to 54. Higher scores represent greater marijuana refusal self-efficacy.

Single items assess other risk behaviors such as sexual risk or violence behaviors. Endorsement of each individual item indicates engagement in the risk behavior.

Assesses symptoms of mental health and social functioning. Scores range from 5 to 25. Higher scores indicate greater anger.

Assesses perceptions of emotion regulation skills. Scores range from 18-90. Higher scores indicate more difficulty regulating emotions.

Assesses use of emotion regulation behaviors taught in the intervention. Scores range from 9 to 36. Higher scores indicate more frequent use of the strategies taught.

Computer-based measure that asks participants to identify the emotion of facial expressions displayed in photographs. Scores range from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate better identification of emotions.

Computerized frustration task in which participants are given the option to quit at any time. Scores range from 0 to 300 seconds. Higher scores indicate more persistence in a frustrating task.

Assesses perception of ability to cope with negative emotions. Scores range from 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate greater perceived ability to cope with negative emotions.

Assesses beliefs about the controllability of emotions. Scores range from 6 to 36. Higher scores indicate stronger beliefs about the controllability of emotions.

Collected in response to virtual reality scenes, RSA is a physiological marker of emotion regulation processes calculated from heart rate variability as an index of parasympathetic activity.

Assesses acceptability of digital interventions to assess implementation outcomes. Scores range from 5 to 25. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability of the intervention.

Assesses usability of technology programs to assess implementation outcomes. Scores range from 10 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater usability of the intervention.