Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03934931

Options for Delivering Isoniazid-Rifapentine (3HP) for TB Prevention (3HP Options Implementation Trial)

The Options for Delivering Isoniazid-Rifapentine (3HP) for TB Prevention (3HP Options Implementation Trial) study will be a three-arm, open-label, parallel, randomized trial. This hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial will be conducted among people living with HIV infection (PLHIV) enrolled in HIV/AIDS care at the Mulago Immune Suppression Syndrome (i.e., HIV/AIDS) clinic in Kampala, Uganda. The overall objective of this study is to identify a patient-centered delivery strategy that will facilitate acceptance and completion of a three-month (12-dose) regimen of weekly rifapentine (RPT) and isoniazid (INH) by PLHIV enrolled in routine HIV/AIDS care in a high HIV/TB burden country. The primary outcome will be acceptance and completion of 3HP. Additional objectives will be to evaluate the implementation and cost-effectiveness of each delivery strategy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The overall objective of this study is to identify a patient-centered strategy that will facilitate 3HP uptake by PLHIV in the context of routine HIV/AIDS care in a high HIV/TB burden country. The investigators' central hypothesis is that offering PLHIV an informed choice between directly observed therapy (DOT) and self-administered therapy (SAT) delivery strategies that are optimized to overcome key barriers to treatment adherence will result in greater acceptance and completion of 3HP. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will conduct a pragmatic randomized trial of three optimized strategies for delivering 3HP. Eligible participants will be randomized to one of three arms to receive latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment with once weekly INH and RPT for 12 weeks given by either facilitated DOT, facilitated SAT, or an informed choice between facilitated DOT and facilitated SAT (with the assistance of a decision aid tool).

Primary Objective: To compare the uptake of 3HP under three delivery strategies: 1) Facilitated DOT; 2) Facilitated SAT; and 3) Informed patient choice (using a decision aid) between facilitated DOT and facilitated SAT. The primary outcome will be defined as the proportion of eligible participants who accept treatment and take at least 11 of 12 doses of RPT/INH within 16 weeks of treatment initiation. Study staff will assess medication dosing using clinic records for participants taking 3HP by DOT and using a combination of 99DOTS (Everwell Health Solutions, India) digital medication adherence technology records and pill counts at refill visits for participants taking 3HP by SAT.

Secondary Objectives:

  • To estimate the costs and compare the cost-effectiveness of the three strategies for delivering 3HP.
  • To identify processes and contextual factors that influence patient acceptance and completion of 3HP under each delivery strategy.
  • To identify clinic-level barriers to adoption and implementation of 3HP under each delivery strategy.
  • To determine the proportion of patients for whom 3HP treatment is discontinued due to adverse events/intolerance.
  • To determine the cumulative 16-month incidence of active TB in each arm, categorized as definite (positive sputum Xpert MTB/RIF or culture) or probable (TB medications started at the discretion of a clinician, with evidence of subsequent improvement).
  • To determine the cumulative 28-month incidence of active TB in each arm, categorized as definite (positive sputum Xpert MTB/RIF or culture) or probable (TB medications started at the discretion of a clinician, with evidence of subsequent improvement).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • HIV-positive client engaged in care at the Mulago ISS clinic
  • Weight ≥40kg
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Capacity to provide informed consent in English or Luganda

Exclusion criteria

  • Suspicion of active TB based on positive World Health Organization (WHO) symptom screen AND elevated point-of-care (POC) C-reactive protein (CRP), or current or planned TB treatment
  • Actively taking an antiretroviral medication contraindicated for use with rifapentine under contemporary WHO or Ugandan policy
  • Contact of a TB patient with known resistance to isoniazid or rifamycins
  • Women who are pregnant, breast feeding or intending to get pregnant in the next 120 days
  • Prisoners
  • Previously completed treatment for active TB or at least 6 months of isoniazid preventive therapy within past 2 years
  • Not intending to remain within 25 km of the Mulago ISS clinic during the study period or to receive further care at the Mulago ISS clinic
  • Lack of access to a mobile telephone or lack of willingness to receive SMS reminders
  • Pre-existing documentation of clinical liver disease.
  • History of sensitivity or intolerance to isoniazid or rifamycins
  • Another household member already enrolled in the study (household members cannot be effectively randomized to different arms)
  • Actively taking medication contraindicated for use with rifamycin (e.g., warfarin, phenytoin)

Mixed methods and health economic sub-studies will include a subset of participants enrolled in the trial, as well as clinic administrators and clinicians (clinical officer, doctor, nurse or pharmacist) involved in 3HP delivery at the Mulago ISS clinic.

Treatment and study plan

Streamlined weekly DOT visits

Other

Streamlined, weekly DOT clinic visits to have health worker observe medication ingestion and screen for side effects

Weekly DOT visit reminders

Other

Weekly SMS or interactive voice response (IVR) phone call reminder for DOT clinic visits

Cost reimbursement DOT

Other

Reimbursement of costs associated with weekly clinic visits (15,000 Ush/visit in Weeks 2-12)

99DOTS

Other

99DOTS-based digital adherence technology to monitor and promote adherence

Weekly SAT dosing reminders/check-ins

Other

Weekly SMS or IVR phone call dosing reminder/check-in for side effects

Cost reimbursement SAT

Other

Reimbursement of costs associated with streamlined refill and end-of treatment clinic visits (15,000 Ush/visit in Weeks 6 and 12)

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants Who Accepted and Completed 3HP

    Time frame: Within 16 weeks of treatment initiation

    The count of eligible participants who accept treatment and take at least 11 of 12 once weekly doses of rifapentine (RPT)/isoniazid (INH) within 16 weeks of treatment initiation divided by the count of those randomized.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants Who Accepted 3HP Treatment

    Time frame: Within 16 weeks of treatment initiation

    The count of eligible people living with HIV (PLHIV) offered 3HP who accept to initiate treatment (by age, gender, CD4 stratum, viral load suppression) divided by the count of those randomized.

  2. Proportion of Participants Who Completed 3HP Treatment

    Time frame: Within 16 weeks of treatment initiation

    Count of participants who take at least 11 of 12 doses within 16 weeks of treatment initiation divided by the count those who take at least one dose of 3HP.

  3. Proportion of People Who Discontinued 3HP Treatment Due to Adverse Events/Intolerance

    Time frame: Within 16 weeks of treatment initiation

    Count of participants for whom treatment is discontinued due to adverse events or intolerance divided by the count of those who initiated 3HP.

  4. Cumulative Incidence of Tuberculosis (TB)

    Time frame: from date of 3HP treatment completion (11/12 doses) or once reached 16 weeks (regardless of number of doses taken) until time of active TB diagnosis or treatment initiation, death, loss to follow-up or end of the 12-month post-treatment follow-up period

    Cumulative 16-month incidence of active TB in each arm

  5. Cumulative Incidence of TB

    Time frame: from date of 3HP treatment completion (11/12 doses) or once reached 16 weeks (regardless of number of doses taken) until time of active TB diagnosis or treatment initiation, death, loss to follow-up or end of the 24-month post-treatment follow-up period

    Cumulative 28-month incidence of active TB in each arm

  6. Cost Effectiveness (Patient Perspective)

    Time frame: At the conclusion of the study period, estimated 3 years

    The incremental patient cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted.

  7. Cost Effectiveness (Health System Perspective)

    Time frame: At the conclusion of the study period, estimated 3 years

    The incremental health system cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted.

  8. Cost Effectiveness (Overall Perspective)

    Time frame: At the conclusion of the study period, estimated 3 years

    Incremental cost of each delivery strategy per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted.

  9. Visit Cost Reimbursement - Overall

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Proportion reimbursed overall

  10. Visit Cost Reimbursement

    Time frame: On the same day as each 3HP clinic visit throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Proportion reimbursed on the same day as each 3HP clinic visit

  11. Time to Complete Clinic Visit - Mean Minutes

    Time frame: On the same day as each 3HP clinic visit throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Mean number of minutes for each DOT/refill visit

  12. Time to Complete Clinic Visit - Median Minutes

    Time frame: On the same day as each 3HP clinic visit throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Median number of minutes for each DOT/refill visit

  13. Short Messages Service (SMS) or Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Phone Call Reminders Delivered - Clinic Visits

    Time frame: The day before each 3HP clinic visit throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Proportion of SMS or IVR phone call reminders delivered to participants for clinic visits

  14. Screening for Active TB

    Time frame: On the same day as each 3HP clinic visit throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Proportion of participants screened for active TB during DOT or refill visits

  15. Screening for Side Effects

    Time frame: On the same day as each 3HP clinic visit throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Proportion of participants screened for side effects during DOT or refill visits.

  16. Dosing Confirmation Via 99DOTS (SAT Only)

    Time frame: On the same day as each scheduled dose throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Proportion of doses confirmed using digital adherence technology. Doses directly observed (i.e., during initial or refill visits) will not be included in the denominator.

  17. SMS or IVR Phone Call Reminders Delivered - Medication Dosing (SAT Only)

    Time frame: The day before each scheduled dose throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Proportion of SMS or IVR phone call reminders delivered to participants for medication dosing

  18. SMS or IVR Phone Calls Delivered - Weekly check-in (SAT Only)

    Time frame: On the same day as each scheduled dose throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Proportion of weekly SMS or IVR phone call check-ins delivered to participants

  19. SMS or IVR Phone Call Reminders Delivered - Missed Dose (SAT Only)

    Time frame: 24 hours after missed scheduled dose throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Proportion of SMS or IVR phone call reminders delivered to participants following missed doses

  20. SMS or IVR Phone Call Missed Appointment Reminders Delivered

    Time frame: 24 hours after missed scheduled appointment throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Proportion of SMS or IVR phone call reminders delivered to participants following missed appointments

  21. Follow up (Phone Calls or Home Visits) for Negative Response to Weekly SMS or IVR Phone Call check-in (SAT Only)

    Time frame: 24 hours after negative response throughout study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Proportion of participants who receive appropriate follow-up (phone call or home visit) for lack of response/negative response to weekly check-in SMS or IVR phone call

  22. Costs of Preventive Services

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Mean total participant costs related to TB preventive care services

  23. Participant Satisfaction

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Mean score on participant satisfaction questionnaire

  24. Barriers to 3HP Delivery From the Provider/Clinic Perspective

    Time frame: At the conclusion of the study period, estimated 3 years

    Thematic interpretation of provider- and clinic-level barriers to care from provider focus group discussions.

  25. Barriers to 3HP Completion From the Patient Perspective

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 16 weeks

    Thematic interpretation of barriers to 3HP completion from patient interviews

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco

Other

Collaborators

  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • Makerere University
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  • University of Colorado, Denver

Registry information

Official study title

Options for Delivering Isoniazid-Rifapentine (3HP) for TB Prevention: the 3HP Options Implementation Trial

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2025
First posted
May 2, 2019
Registry last updated
May 11, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.