manifest refraction
ProcedureManifest refraction performed by autorefraction (automated) and manual procedures (standard)
NCT Number: NCT02842151
The purpose of this study is to evaluate current available assessments (automated vs. manual) with which manifest refraction data and biometric variables are obtained to understand if data from an automated refractor can be utilized to optimize the A-constant as well as manual subjective refraction (ie, to a clinically insignificant difference). The A-constant is the calculated number that helps the surgeon determine which IOL should be implanted in the eye during cataract surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me22 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Subjects will be implanted with ACRYSOF® IQ Monofocal IOL Model SN60WF. Standard clinical practice will be followed for pre-operative testing, IOL power estimation and IOL implantation. Only one eye will be enrolled in the study per surgeon determination. The eye will undergo both an automated and manual manifest refraction assessment at 3 months postoperative.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Manifest refraction performed by autorefraction (automated) and manual procedures (standard)
Monofocal IOL implanted for long-term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient
Wavefront and topography system used to obtain autorefraction data
Time frame: Month 3 (Day 80-100) Post Study Eye Implantation
The A-constant, is a type of IOL constant, that accounts for clinical variables that may affect the refractive outcome (e.g. patient factors, biometry method). It relates the power of the IOL to axial length and corneal measurements. It is specific to the design of the IOL, style, and placement within the eye. The optimization of the A-constant is fundamental to achieving the targeted refractive outcomes, offset any observed error and for ensuring high patient satisfaction following cataract surgery. Since errors/noise from refraction plays a significant role in A-constant optimization, it is important to determine if an automated method has any advantages over conventional manifest refraction. A-constants based on autorefraction and manifest refraction for the study eye are compared for each subject. The mean difference between the two methods cannot be greater than 0.15 D at each of the three study centers for the methods to be considered equivalent.
Alcon Research
Industry
Optimizing the Assessment of Refractive Outcomes After Cataract Surgery and Implantation of a Monofocal IOL
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07735000
Age Related Cataract, Cataract
Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07605260
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06428955
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06111222
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Heidelberg, Germany
View Trial Details