University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07573540
The goal of this study is to develop a machine-learning guided recovery messaging system. The main question it aims to answer is can messages be used to:
* help people to improve their health * make changes in people's lives to address alcohol and substance use
Participants will:
* complete surveys * use a recovery-support digital therapeutic system
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, United States
Location status: Recruiting
This study seeks to optimize messaging components which can be implemented in a recovery support messaging system such as may accompany a digital therapeutic app, in order to determine optimal messaging to increase interaction with recovery support resources, and whether messaging has any effect on clinical outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Automated recovery support messaging system for participants with alcohol use disorder (AUD), paired with a machine learning guided relapse risk prediction model.
Other names: Smart Technology for Addiction Recovery
Time frame: data collected at 2 and 4 months
Measured as days of engagement with the recovery system.
Time frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
Data collected via Timeline Followback (TLFB) conducted by interview at 0, 2, and 4 months. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) lapse reports will be used to supplement the TLFB. These are daily surveys where the participant answers the question "have you had a drink you have not yet reported?" (Yes/No). If yes they are asked to indicate the date of their drinking and how many drinks they consumed that day (less than 1, 1-2, 3, 4, 5-6, 7-8, over 8). Four or more drinks are considered heavy drinking days for women and greater than 4 drinks are considered heavy drinking days for men.
Time frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
Data collected via Timeline Followback (TLFB) conducted by interview at 0, 2, and 4 months. EMA lapse reports will be used to supplement the TLFB. These are daily surveys where the participant answers the question "have you had a drink you have not yet reported?" (Yes/No). If yes, they are asked to indicate the date of their drinking.
Time frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
10 items rated on 0-10 Likert scale where lower scores represent worse functioning and higher scores represent better functioning. Total possible range of scores is from 0-100.
Time frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
7 items rated on 0-3 Likert scale where lower scores represent better functioning and higher scores represent worse functioning. Total possible range of scores is from 0-21.
Time frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
1-4 Likert scale. Some items are reverse coded but higher total scores represent better functioning and lower total scores represent worse functioning. Scored as total score 4-56.
Time frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
1-4 Likert scale. Some items are reverse coded but higher total scores represent better functioning and lower total scores represent worse functioning. Scored in 4 domains (social, physical, human, and cultural), each from 1-14.
Time frame: data collected at baseline, 2, 4 months
9 items rated on 1-4 Likert scale. Total possible range of scores from 0-27 where lower scores represent better functioning and higher scores represent worse functioning.
Time frame: data collected at 2 and 4 months
Six items rated on 1-7 Likert scale. Scored in 3 domains (Goals, Tasks, Bonds, each with 2 items) with possible scores from 2 to 14 where higher scores represent greater alliance with the STAR system in that domain.
Time frame: data collected at 2 and 4 months
Seven items rated on 1-7 Likert scale. Total possible scores from 7 to 49 where higher scores represent greater valuation of STAR message usefulness.
Time frame: data collected at 2 and 4 months
Ten items rated on 1-7 Likert scale. Total possible scores from 10 to 70 where higher scores represent greater trust in the STAR system.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Other
Optimizing Algorithmic Feedback About Lapse Risk for Trust, Engagement, and Clinical Outcomes for Alcohol Use Disorder
Acronym: STAR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04998916
Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol Use Disorder
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05096117
Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol Use Disorder
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06860607
Alcohol Use Disorder, Alcohol-Related Disorders
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07191561
Alcohol Use Disorder, Alcohol-Related Disorders
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details