Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03650959

Optimizing Resource Utilization During Proficiency-based Training of Suturing Skills to Medical Students

Evidence favours teaching procedural skills to medical students using a proficiency-based rather than time-based approach. Basic suturing skills can be taught through faculty-led, peer tutor-led, and computer augmented approaches. One method has yet to be identified as superior in terms of educational outcomes, resource utilization, and participant perspectives.

Pre-clerkship medical students were randomized to: faculty, peer tutor, or computer augmented learning. Participants practiced suturing through their randomized method until they reached targeted proficiency defined using hand motion analysis (HMA). Proficiency was defined as a score of the average plus a standard deviation of five surgeons' HMA for two of three consecutive sutures using appropriate technique.

The primary outcome was the number of stitches placed to achieve proficiency. The secondary outcomes were the number of sutures used, time, and costs incurred. Learning curves were constructed. Participants' perceptions were assessed using a follow-up survey.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Queen's Unviersity

Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Second year, pre-clerkship medical students

Exclusion criteria

  • None

Treatment and study plan

Method of learning simple interrupted sutures with instrument tie

Other

Students will train to proficiency (defined by hand motion analysis) on simple interrupted sutures with an instrument tie via one of three different methods: faculty-led, peer tutor-led, or computer augmented self-directed learning.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of stitched laid to reach proficiency

    Time frame: Five days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of sutures used to reach proficiency

    Time frame: Five days

  2. Minutes to reach proficiency

    Time frame: Five days

  3. Individual costs to reach proficiency

    Time frame: Five days

Other outcomes

  1. Learning curves

    Time frame: Five days

  2. Student preferences

    Time frame: Five days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Queen's University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Optimizing Resource Utilization During Proficiency-Based Training of Suturing Skills to Medical Students: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Faculty-Led, Peer Tutor-Led, and Computer Augmented Methods of Teaching

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Aug 29, 2018
Registry last updated
Sep 27, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.