Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07285616

Optimizing Graft Selection in Glaucoma Surgery: A Comparative Study of Sclera, Pericardium, and Corneal Tissue

Glaucoma refers to a group of progressive optic neuropathies that lead to permanent vision loss. Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally. In 2020, it was estimated to affect 76 million individuals worldwide, with projections indicating this number will rise to 111.8 million by 2040. In Canada, glaucoma affects an estimated 2.7-7.5% of individuals over the age of 50, contributing substantially to the national disease burden. This condition is linked to damage of the optic nerve due to elevated intraocular pressure (IOP; raised eye pressure), which results in the loss of retinal ganglion cells. Therefore, most of the treatments are guided towards reducing the IOP either via using laser, medications or surgery.

Glaucoma surgery is typically reserved for cases where IOP remains uncontrolled while on maximum tolerated medical therapy and/or where glaucoma progression warrants surgery. The goal of many glaucoma surgeries is to divert aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space, therefore reducing intraocular pressure. The device used for this purpose are the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt (Glaukos Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA, USA) (the documents will interchangeably use terms "stent" and "shunt" to refer to these devices in the text below). The device is implanted using the ab externo approach to channel fluid from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival/subtenon space. To reduce postoperative fibrosis and inhibit fibroblast activity that could obstruct flow and lead to device failure, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or mitomycin C (MMC) are administered. Additionally, a double-layered closure of conjunctiva and Tenon's is performed to minimize Tenon's migration and blockage of tenon the stents. Despite these measures, stent encapsulation and failure are still too common requiring revisions and bleb needling in 2-20% of cases within the first 12 months of follow-up.

This project will involve a series of studies evaluating graft selection in PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation, focusing on donor sclera, cornea, and pericardium as patch graft materials. First, the investigators will conduct a prospective, randomized study comparing clinical outcomes between these graft types. Outcomes of interest will include surgical success rates, post-operative hypotony, tube erosion, conjunctival complications, infection, and overall device longevity. Donor sclera has long been used as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage device surgery and is associated with low erosion rates and reliable long-term results. Corneal tissue is increasingly used due to its transparency and availability through eye banks, with demonstrated safety in ocular surface reconstruction and tube coverage. Pericardium is another durable, biocompatible option, historically applied in both cardiovascular and ocular surgery, and has shown effectiveness as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage implants. This comparison will extend to both primary implantation and revision surgeries, recognizing the high clinical relevance of graft performance in complex cases.

Building on these results, the investigators will then perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of graft strategies, incorporating surgical time, post-operative management, complication rates, and need for re-operation. An economic model will be developed to evaluate costs and resource utilization associated with each material, providing valuable data for policy and surgical decision-making. Finally, the investigators will conduct a patient-reported outcome (PRO) study to assess patient comfort and satisfaction with different grafts. Surveys will evaluate domains such as foreign body sensation, cosmesis, and overall satisfaction at key time points (immediate post-operative period, 1 week, 3 weeks, and 3 months). These results will highlight the patient perspective, an often underrepresented but critical factor in surgical innovation.

Together, these studies will comprehensively assess graft selection from surgical, economic, and patient-centered perspectives, informing evidence-based practice in glaucoma care.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–110 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Royal Alexandra Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, T5H 3V9, Canada

Location contact

Gurkaran Sarohia, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mathew Palakkamanil, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Paige Campbell, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

4039695473

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years and older
  • Patients selected for PreserFlo microshunt surgery and XEN stent alone or in combination with cataract surgery.
  • Ability to comprehend the study procedures

Exclusion criteria

  • Unwilling or unable to give consent
  • Unable to come for scheduled post-operative visits
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Previous cyclodestructive procedures, scleral buckling procedures, or presence of silicone oil
  • Conjunctival scarring precluding a glaucoma surgery superiorly
  • Active iris neovascularization or active proliferative retinopathy
  • Vitreous in the anterior chamber for which a vitrectomy is anticipated.
  • Previous trabeculectomy, tube-shunt implantation, or surgeries that shunt aqueous outflow into the subconjunctival space

Treatment and study plan

MicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft

Procedure

Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor scleral patch graft to cover the tube.

MicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft

Procedure

Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor corneal patch graft to cover the tube.

MicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft

Procedure

Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with pericardial patch graft to cover the tube.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) from Baseline to 12 Months

    Time frame: 12 months

    IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (mmHg) at baseline, post-operative Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12. The primary endpoint will be the mean change at 12 months.

  2. Surgical Success Rate at 12 Months

    Time frame: 12 months

    Proportion of eyes achieving target IOP (≤18 mmHg or ≥20% reduction from baseline) without additional glaucoma surgery, vision-threatening complication, or device removal.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Glaucoma medication burden

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of glaucoma medications used per patient, counted from the medication list at each follow-up (baseline, Month 3, 6, 12). Outcome reported as: Mean change in number of medications.

  2. Need for re-operation

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number and percentage of eyes requiring any additional glaucoma or device-related surgery during the study period.

    Outcome reported as: Count and proportion of eyes re-operated.

  3. Bleb needling rate

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number and proportion of eyes requiring bleb needling postoperatively to maintain or restore filtration.

  4. Tube/patch graft exposure or erosion

    Time frame: 12 months

    Clinically confirmed exposure or erosion of tube or patch graft, as documented on slit-lamp exam.

    Outcome reported as: Number and percentage of affected eyes.

  5. Hypotony

    Time frame: 12 months

    IOP < 5 mmHg on two consecutive visits measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (mmHg).

    Outcome reported as: Number and percentage of eyes meeting the definition.

  6. Infection

    Time frame: 12 months

    Any endophthalmitis, blebitis, or wound infection confirmed on clinical exam. Outcome reported as: Number and percentage of eyes with infection.

  7. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change

    Time frame: 12 months

    BCVA measured using a standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at 4 m (logMAR scale).

    Outcome reported as: Mean change in logMAR from baseline to 12 months (lower values = better vision).

  8. Device survival (time to failure)

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

    Time from surgery to defined surgical failure (loss of pressure control, device removal, or re-operation).

    Outcome reported as: Kaplan-Meier survival curve; median time to failure.

  9. Patient-reported comfort

    Time frame: Immediate postop (day 1), 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 months.

    Measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10) where 0 = no discomfort and 10 = worst possible discomfort.

    Assessment points: Post-op Day 1, Week 1, Week 3, and Month 3. Outcome reported as: Mean ± SD at each time point.

  10. Foreign body sensation

    Time frame: Day 1, 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 months.

    Evaluated using a Likert scale (1-5) where 1 = none and 5 = severe sensation. Assessment points: Day 1, Week 1, Week 3, Month 3. Outcome reported as: Mean ± SD and proportion reporting moderate-to-severe sensation (≥4).

  11. Cosmesis/satisfaction

    Time frame: 3 weeks and 3 months.

    Measured with a 5-point Likert scale assessing satisfaction with postoperative appearance (1 = very dissatisfied; 5 = very satisfied).

    Assessment points: Week 3 and Month 3. Outcome reported as: Mean ± SD; higher scores = greater satisfaction.

  12. Health care resource use

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of postoperative visits, additional procedures, and unscheduled urgent encounters recorded per participant from the medical record.

    Outcome reported as: Mean count per participant and associated cost estimate (CAD).

  13. Cost-utility

    Time frame: 12 months

    Calculated using trial-based costs and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimates derived from EQ-5D-5L utility weights.

    Outcome reported as: Incremental cost per QALY gained by graft type.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Paige Campbell, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

14039695473

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Alberta

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Optimizing Graft Selection in Glaucoma Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.