Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04038567

Optimizing a Mobile Mindfulness Intervention for ICU Survivors

This is a factorial experimental trial involving adult survivors of cardiorespiratory failure treated in intensive care units (ICUs) that is conceptualized as the Optimization Phase of a multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework. This will allow optimization of a mobile mindfulness intervention by comparing eight different iterations across domains including impact on symptoms, feasibility, acceptability, usability, scalability, and cost.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Colorado - Denver, Aurora, Colorado, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

As survival has improved for the 2 million people with cardiorespiratory failure managed annually in US intensive care units (ICUs), it has become apparent that these patients suffer from severe and persistent post-discharge symptoms of psychological distress including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, few targeted interventions exist that are relevant to patients' experiences and that accommodate their many physical, social, and financial barriers to personalized care. To fill this gap, an innovative app-based mobile mindfulness training program twas developed hat promotes automated care delivery and self-management of symptom-related distress.

Subsequently, a pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) called the LIFT study (R34 AT00819) compared mobile mindfulness to both a standard telephone mindfulness program and an ICU education control among survivors of cardiorespiratory failure. Key findings were that mobile mindfulness was feasibly delivered, acceptable, usable, and had a greater clinical impact on psychological distress than either comparator. This trial also highlighted opportunities to improve the intervention's impact related to its targeted population, content delivery, and system technology.

To address these gaps, this 5-year project is conceptualized as the Optimization Phase of a multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework. It will optimize mobile mindfulness with four specific aims as described in the following sections. At the conclusion of this factorial randomized clinical trial study involving 240 cardiorespiratory failure survivors, a mobile mindfulness system fully optimized for usability, efficiency, scalability, and clinical impact will be delivered that will be off-the-shelf ready for a next-step definitive RCT-and can serve as a model for distance-based mind and body interventions.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (age ≥18)
  • Acute cardiorespiratory failure:
  • Acute respiratory failure, defined as ≥1 of the following:
  • mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube for ≥12 hours
  • non-invasive ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP) for ≥4 hours in a 24-hour period provided for acute respiratory failure in an ICU (not for obstructive sleep apnea or other stable use)
  • high flow nasal cannula or face mask oxygen for ≥4 hours in a 24-hour period and / or
  • Acute cardiac / circulatory failure, defined as ≥1 of the following:
  • use of vasopressors for shock of any etiology for ≥1 hour
  • use of inotropes for shock of any etiology for ≥1 hour
  • use of pulmonary vascular vasoactive medications
  • use of aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock for ≥1 hour
  • Managed in an adult medical cardiac, trauma, surgical, or neurological ICU, stepdown unit, or monitored ward unit for ≥24 hours during the time inclusion criterion #2 is met.
  • Cognitive status intact
  • No history of pre-existing significant cognitive impairment (e.g., dementia) as per medical chart
  • Absence of current significant cognitive impairment (impairment defined as ≥3 errors on the Callahan cognitive status screen)
  • Decisional capacity present
  • Absence of severe and/or persistent mental illness
  • Treatment for severe and/or persistent mental illness (e.g., psychosis, bipolar affective disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizoid personality disorder, schizophrenia [as per medical record], hospitalization for any psychiatric disorder) within the 6 months preceding the current hospital admission
  • No endorsement of suicidality at time of admission or informed consent
  • No active substance abuse within the 3 months preceding the current admission serious enough to limit completion of study procedures in the opinion of the site investigator.
  • English fluency.

Exclusion criteria

(in hospital):

  • Hospitalized within the preceding 3 months with life-threatening illness or injury.

Patients may be enrolled into the study if they had a hospitalization within the preceding 3 months that is determined to be non-serious. Non-serious admissions are defined as those admissions that are non-life threatening and/or potentially impacting patient's well-being long-term or likely to precipitate additional future admissions. Examples of non-life-threatening hospitalizations could be, but may not be limited to, admission for a bronchoscopy, admission for deep vein thrombosis, or admission to ED resulting in overnight stay for cardiac work-up.

  • Admitted from a location other than home (e.g., nursing home, long-term acute care facility, inpatient rehabilitation facility)
  • Anticipated or actual discharge to a location other than independent in a home setting (e.g., nursing home, long-term acute care facility, inpatient rehabilitation facility, home hospice)
  • Complex medical care expected soon after discharge (e.g., planned surgeries, transplantation evaluation, extensive travel needs for hemodialysis, disruptive chemotherapy/radiation regimen)
  • Unable to complete study procedures as determined by staff
  • Lack of reliable smartphone with cellular data plan or wifi access

Exclusion criteria

(at T1, post-discharge):

  • Low baseline psychological distress symptoms, defined as the absence of the following at T1: PHQ-9 score <5
  • Failure to randomize within 2 month (60 days) post-discharge.

Treatment and study plan

Mobile mindfulness-based training

Behavioral

The intervention core is a mobile app-based mindfulness training program designed to be used over a 1-month period. All 6 factorial groups will use the app, though the delivery of the app and response to psychological distress symptoms over time will differ by group.

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item Scale (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: 1 month post-randomization

    Absolute values, not change scores. Depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 (better) to 27 (worse)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale (GAD-7)

    Time frame: Between baseline 1 month post-randomization

    Absolute values, not change scores. Anxiety symptoms. Scores range from 0 (better) to 21 (worse)

  2. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item Scale (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization

    Absolute values, not change scores. Depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 (better) to 27 (worse)

  3. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale (GAD-7)

    Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization

    Absolute values, not change scores. Anxiety symptoms. Scores range from 0 (better) to 21 (worse)

  4. Post-Traumatic Stress Symptom Inventory (PTSS)

    Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization

    Absolute values, not change scores. PTSD symptoms. Scores can range from 10 (best) to 70 (worst).

  5. Intervention Adherence: Activity in App During Final Week of Intervention

    Time frame: 1 month post-randomization

    Quantified by number with activity (or not) in app during final week (4) of intervention

  6. Intervention Adherence: Number of Views of Content

    Time frame: 1 month post-randomization

    Quantified by mean (SD) number of intervention content (audio, video, text) views

  7. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)

    Time frame: 3 months post-randomization

    A measure of acceptability. Scores can range from 8 (worst) to 32 (best)

  8. Systems Usability Scale (SUS)

    Time frame: 3 months post-randomization

    A measure of intervention usability. Each of 10 items is scored from 1 to 5. For each of the odd numbered questions, subtract 1 from the score.

    For each of the even numbered questions, subtract their value from 5. Take these new values and add up the total score. Then multiply this by 2.5.Scores can range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)

  9. Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)

    Time frame: Between baseline and 1 month post-randomization

    This is the absolute value, not change score. A measure of mindfulness qualities. Scores can range from 5 (worst) to 30 (best).

  10. Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)

    Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization

    These are absolute values, not change scores. A measure of mindfulness qualities. Scores can range from 5 (worst) to 30 (best).

  11. Patient Health Questionnaire 10-item Scale (PHQ-10)

    Time frame: Between baseline and 1 month post-randomization

    These are absolute values, not change scores. An adapted version of the PHQ-15; a measure of physical symptoms. Scores can range from 10 (best) to 20 (worst).

  12. Patient Health Questionnaire 10-item Scale (PHQ-10)

    Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization

    This is an absolute value, not a change score. An adapted version of the PHQ-15; a measure of physical symptoms. Scores can range from 10 (best) to 20 (worst).

  13. EuroQOL Scale

    Time frame: Between baseline and 1 month post-randomization

    This is an absolute, not change, value. the EuroQOL is a measure of quality of life. Scores can range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)

  14. Change in EuroQOL Scale

    Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization

    A measure of quality of life. Scores can range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)

  15. Distress Associated With Depression Symptom Frequency

    Time frame: Between baseline and 1 month post-randomization; THIS WAS NOT RECORDED

    A visual analog scale appended to the PHQ-9 which allows participants to report how distressing they perceive the depression symptoms to be that they reported in the PHQ-9. Scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)

  16. Distress Associated With Depression Symptom Frequency

    Time frame: At 1 month post-randomization

    A visual analog scale appended to the PHQ-9 which allows participants to report how distressing they perceive the depression symptoms to be that they reported in the PHQ-9. Scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)

  17. Distress Associated With Anxiety Symptom Frequency

    Time frame: At 1 month post-randomization

    A visual analog scale appended to the GAD-7 which allows participants to report how distressing they perceive the depression symptoms to be that they reported in the GAD-7. Scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)

  18. Distress Associated With Anxiety Symptom Frequency

    Time frame: Between baseline 3 months post-randomization

    A visual analog scale appended to the GAD-7 which allows participants to report how distressing they perceive the depression symptoms to be that they reported in the GAD-7. Scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)

  19. Distress Associated With PTSD Symptom Frequency

    Time frame: At 1 month post-randomization

    A visual analog scale appended to the PTSS which allows participants to report how distressing they perceive the depression symptoms to be that they reported in the PTSS. Scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)

  20. Distress Associated With PTSD Symptom Frequency

    Time frame: At 3 months post-randomization

    Absolute values, not change scores. A visual analog scale appended to the PTSS which allows participants to report how distressing they perceive the depression symptoms to be that they reported in the PTSS. Scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst)

  21. Post-Traumatic Stress Symptom Inventory (PTSS)

    Time frame: Between baseline and 1 month post-randomization

    Absolute values, not change scores. Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. Scores can range from 10 (best) to 70 (worst).

  22. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)

    Time frame: 1 month post-randomization

    A measure of acceptability. Scores can range from 8 (worst) to 32 (best)

  23. Systems Usability Scale (SUS)

    Time frame: 1 month post-randomization

    A measure of intervention usability. Each of 10 items is scored from 1 to 5. For each of the odd numbered questions, subtract 1 from the score.

    For each of the even numbered questions, subtract their value from 5. Take these new values and add up the total score. Then multiply this by 2.5.Scores can range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Duke University

Other

Collaborators

  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
  • University of Colorado, Denver
  • University of Washington

Registry information

Official study title

Optimizing a Self-directed Mobile Mindfulness Intervention for Improving Cardiorespiratory Failure Survivors' Psychological Distress

Acronym: LIFT2

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jul 31, 2019
Registry last updated
Aug 15, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.