University Hospital RWTH Aachen
Aachen, 52074, Germany
NCT Number: NCT04879537
Due to "demographic change", the composition of the population in Germany is changing. The consequence of this change is a population that is getting older on average. A key challenge is the appropriate nursing and medical care of older people in senior residences and care facilities. The increasing workload for nursing staff and doctors in the outpatient sector means that timely care for patients, e.g. in the form of GP visits, cannot always be guaranteed in a timely manner. The results are unnecessary or premature hospital admissions as well as ambulance and emergency care interventions, even though in many cases it is not an acute or even life-threatening event. Furthermore, it has been scientifically proven that hospital admissions can increase the risk of patients becoming confused. The aim of this project is to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions and to enable patients to remain in their familiar surroundings as far as this appears medically justifiable. At the same time, the study aims to improve the medical care of nursing home residents through better networking of medical areas, the use of tele-consultations and an early warning system.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aachen, 52074, Germany
The Optimal@NRW project represents a new cross-sectoral approach to the acute care and support of geriatric people in need of care through the implementation of an early warning system and the integration of a telemedical consultation system in 25 nursing homes in the region of Aachen in Germany. The project focuses on restructuring emergency care in nursing homes and improving cooperation between the actors involved (emergency service, emergency department, general practitioners, nursing staff, etc.). Accordingly, a central emergency number of the statutory health insurance funds is to act as a virtual hub for the care of geriatric patients.
The concrete approach of the project is that the participating nursing homes first contact the medical call centre (116 117) in case of a medical problem. The call centre is then responsible for an initial medical assessment and decides whether the respective GP can be called in or whether a teleconsultation with the "virtual digital desk" (i.e. the medical experts from the emergency department of the University Hospital RWTH Aachen) should be carried out. In addition, mobile nursing assistants (NÄPÄ (Z)) will be introduced as part of the project, who can also support the nursing staff and provide services that can be delegated by doctors - especially if the general practitioner is not available at the time.
In addition, a standardised early warning system is to be established in the nursing homes and its benefits evaluated. This will enable potentially dangerous changes in the state of health of nursing home residents to be detected earlier.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The nursing homes participating in the project will be equipped with telemedical equipment. This will allow teleconsultations to take place when needed. In addition, an early warning system will be introduced and, within the framework of the teleconsultation, a trained medical assistant can be sent to the care facility if necessary, who can carry out medical activities on site under a physician's delegated instructions. In addition, an electronic patient file will be introduced which can be accessed by the telemedicine physician and the general practitioner.
Time frame: 24 months
Days spent at hospital
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 24 months
Days spent at nursing home
Time frame: 24 months
Number of medical contacts
Time frame: 24 months
Time to doctor contact
Time frame: 24 months
Admission to hospital in general and to specific diagnosis
Time frame: 24 months
Use of medical services
Time frame: 24 months
Number of ambulatory sensitive hospital cases
Time frame: 24 months
Cost effects via HCRU
Time frame: 24 months
Transport units used
Time frame: 24 months
Quality of life assessed using Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD). The total score ranges from 13 to 52, with a higher number indicating better quality of life
Time frame: 24 months
Quality of life assessed using Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12). The outcome includes a physical and mental health component score (PCS and MCS, respectively). Each component score (PCS and MCS) has a range of 0-100, with a higher score on the PCS and MCS indicating better outcome, or better physical or mental health-related quality of life, respectively.
Time frame: 24 months
Assessment procedures of daily living skills assessed via Barthel Index. Score of the Barthel Index ranging from 0 to 100 were collected when 0 is the minimum (worst outcome) and 100 is the maximum (best outcome).
Time frame: 24 months
Identification of people with dementia syndromes in inpatient care for the elderly using Dementia Screening Scale (DSS). Score of the DSS ranging from 0 to 14. When 0 is the minimum (no impairment) and 14 is the maximum (maximum impairment).
Time frame: 24 months
Number of double prescriptions (drug therapy safety)
Time frame: 24 months
Number of hospitalizations due to medication (drug therapy safety)
Time frame: 24 months
Number of adverse events due to medication (drug therapy safety)
Time frame: 24 months
Time-to-event concerning medication and hospitalization (drug therapy safety)
Time frame: 24 months
Need for additional staff in case of telemedical call
Time frame: 24 months
Amount of ambulance service calls
Time frame: 9 to 18 months depending on the cluster affiliation
hospital referrals and use of primary care physicians and physicians of the GP emergency service before and after the implementation of telemedicine in nursing homes
Time frame: 24 months
Response times in doctor-patient contact before and after the implementation of telemedicine in nursing homes
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 24 months
Reasons for deviations (lack of knowledge, individual knowledge about patient, allergies, living will, local conditions/treatment resources, patient wishes)
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Number of deviations between initially defined catalogue of requirements and acutal requirements
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Questionnaire about the acceptance of nursing home staff
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Questionnaire or interview to survey acceptance by caregivers and residents
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Questionnaire or interview to survey the usability
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Incidence of parameters leading to alarm/decisive parameters
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Incidence of correct recognition of deteriorating medical conditions
Time frame: 6 to 15 months depending on the cluster affiliation
Time frame: 24 months
Gender differences
Time frame: 24 months
Questionnaires to survey satisfaction about the intervention in the project
Time frame: 24 months
Interviews to survey satisfaction about the intervention in the project
Time frame: 24 months
Questionnaires to clarify whether the intervention is seen as ethically appropriate
Time frame: 24 months
Interviews to clarify whether the intervention is seen as ethically appropriate
Time frame: 24 months
Questionnaires to survey acceptance about the intervention in the project
Time frame: 24 months
Interviews to survey acceptance about the intervention in the project
RWTH Aachen University
Other
Acronym: Optimal@NRW
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04497922
Behavior, COVID-19
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04916028
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Disease Attributes
Amiens, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04031183
Disease Attributes, Emergencies
Angers, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03107260
Cerebral Saturation, Cognition Disorders
Amiens, Picardie, France
View Trial Details