Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, Austria
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Lukas Ruoff, MSc
CONTACT
Thomas Schlöglhofer, PhD, MSc
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07619144
The main goal of this observational, study is to develop a clinical decision support tool utilizing Impella 5.5 pump parameters to predict native heart recovery and prevent adverse events, by leveraging data science and real-world clinical data of cardiogenic shock patients.
Therefore, secondary objectives are essential to consolidating a retrospective longitudinal analysis of Impella 5.5 pump data alongside ICU digital health record datasets to:
1. Validate the Impella 5.5 placement signal by comparing it with ICU arterial line waveforms. 2. Integrate pump data with ICU clinical data to identify patterns associated with therapy outcomes, including native heart recovery, heart replacement therapy, and mortality while on device support. 3. Define clinical scenarios linked to hemolysis, HRAEs, and arrhythmias and develop predictive models to mitigate their occurrence.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Vienna, Austria
Location status: Recruiting
Lukas Ruoff, MSc
CONTACT
Thomas Schlöglhofer, PhD, MSc
CONTACT
The clinical management of patients experiencing severe cardiogenic shock requires precise, real-time monitoring to optimize hemodynamic support and guide therapeutic transitions. The Impella 5.5 micro-axial flow pump provides left ventricular unloading, generating automated internal continuous parameters that reflect moving cardiac states. This study establishes a retrospective, longitudinal framework that integrates these high-frequency device metrics with corresponding clinical data housed within intensive care unit (ICU) digital health records (DHR). By synthesizing these disparate data streams, this research aims to build an advanced analytical framework to support clinical decisions in the cardiogenic shock landscape.
Signal Validation and Data Preprocessing:
The initial phase of the study validates the physiological fidelity of the continuous data stream. High-frequency digital logs generated by the pump console-specifically the optical placement signal-will undergo time-series alignment with standard physiological waveforms recorded in the ICU, using indwelling arterial line pressure data as the reference standard. This signal validation ensures that the longitudinal parameter data accurately capture mechanical positioning and true left ventricular dynamics prior to entering the downstream modeling pipeline.
Analytical Framework and Modeling Strategy:
Following data integration and signal validation, the consolidated dataset will be leveraged to develop predictive models aimed at distinguishing patient trajectories and forecasting complications. The computational pipeline is divided into two primary analytical pathways:
Endpoint Classification:
An artificial neural network will be developed to evaluate patient trajectories toward distinct clinical endpoints: native heart recovery, escalation to heart replacement therapy, or death. The modeling pipeline incorporates a rigorous framework to ensure generalizability and guard against overfitting. The complete dataset will be partitioned into an 80% development subset and a 20% independent testing subset. The development subset will undergo 5-fold cross-validation to drive comprehensive model architecture optimization, systematically testing structural variations to identify the highest-performing network configuration.
Adverse Event Forecasting:
Separate statistical and machine learning architectures will be constructed to evaluate risk patterns and clinical scenarios associated with severe on-device complications, specifically clinical hemolysis, new-onset arrhythmias, and hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs). These models focus on identifying early-warning clusters within the high-frequency pump log data to identify sub-clinical changes before manifest physiological degradation occurs.
Through these combined pathways, this observational study seeks to lay the foundational algorithmic groundwork for a real-time clinical decision support tool utilizing objective, automated device analytics to improve safety and personalization in mechanical circulatory support.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Temporary circulatory support using the Impella 5.5 micro-axial flow pump. The device is surgically placed (typically via the axillary artery) across the aortic valve into the left ventricle to provide active forward flow, unloading the left ventricle and maintaining systemic perfusion during cardiogenic shock. Management of the device includes the collection and analysis of continuous device-derived hemodynamic data and associated clinical parameters throughout the duration of support.
Time frame: From the time of Impella 5.5 insertion up to device explant (estimated average of 5 to 14 days).
The predictive performance of the developed clinical decision support tool will be evaluated by its ability to classify patient trajectories toward native heart recovery versus adverse outcomes. The model will undergo comprehensive model architecture optimization to identify the structural configuration that yields optimal performance.
Model training, validation, and testing will follow a standard data split: 80% of the dataset will be utilized for training and internal validation using 5-fold cross-validation, and the remaining 20% will be held out as a definitive testing dataset.
Final classification performance will be quantified using specific metrics derived from Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, including: Area Under the Curve (AUC), Sensitivity, Specificity
Time frame: Continuously through the duration of active Impella 5.5 device support (from device insertion up to explant, estimated average of 5 to 14 days).
The systematic difference (bias) between the automated Impella 5.5 optical placement signal and the gold-standard ICU indwelling arterial line pressure waveforms will be quantified using Bland-Altman analysis to evaluate signal alignment.
Unit of Measure: Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Time frame: Continuously through the duration of active Impella 5.5 device support (from device insertion up to explant, estimated average of 5 to 14 days).
The strength and direction of the linear relationship between the continuous time-series data of the Impella 5.5 optical placement signal and the ICU arterial line waveforms will be evaluated.
Unit of Measure: Correlation coefficient (r) on a scale from -1.0 to 1.0.
Time frame: Continuously through the duration of active Impella 5.5 device support (from device insertion up to explant, estimated average of 5 to 14 days).
The trending ability of the placement signal will be assessed via concordance plots. The concordance rate represents the percentage of data points where the directional change (increase or decrease) matches between both signal streams over time, excluding zones of clinical noise.
Unit of Measure: Percentage (%) of concordant data pairs.
Time frame: Through the duration of hospital stay (estimated average of 30 days).
The final clinical trajectory of the cohort on device support will be categorized into one of three mutually exclusive outcomes:
Unit of Measure: Percentage (%) of participants within each categorical outcome category.
Time frame: From device insertion up to 30 days post-explant or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.
The incidence of clinically significant hemolysis on device support, defined by standard laboratory criteria (e.g., plasma free hemoglobin greater than 40 mg/dL or a doubling of lactate dehydrogenase alongside clinical signs).
Unit of Measure: Percentage (%) of participants.
Time frame: From device insertion up to 30 days post-explant or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.
The incidence of new-onset atrial or ventricular arrhythmias occurring during device support that require immediate pharmacological, electrical, or device-setting intervention.
Unit of Measure: Percentage (%) of participants.
Time frame: From device insertion up to 30 days post-explant or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.
The rate of hemocompatibility-related adverse events, including major bleeding episodes (requiring transfusion or reoperation) and thromboembolic events (e.g., ischemic stroke, peripheral arterial embolization) occurring during device support.
Unit of Measure: Number of events per participant.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Lukas Ruoff, MSc
CONTACT
Thomas Schlöglhofer, PhD, MSc
CONTACT
Medical University of Vienna
Other
Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events Associated With Microaxial Flow Pump Support: An Explorative Retrospective Study
Acronym: OPTIMIZE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07323238
Cardiogenic Shock, Cardiogenic Shock Acute
Hong Kong, Shatin
View Trial DetailsNCT07597291
Cardiogenic Shock, Cardiogenic Shock Acute
Carnaxide, Lisbon District, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT06487091
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiogenic Shock
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07380659
Cardiogenic Shock, Cardiogenic Shock Post Myocardial Infarction
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial Details