Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06612437

Optimization of Time Parameters of Priming iTBS for Poststroke Motor Rehabilitation

The goal of this clinical trial is to identify the effect of different time intervals between continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) and intermittent theta burst stimulation(iTBS), on top of a standard robot-assisted training (RAT) for sensorimotor rehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke. Using electroencephalography (EEG) to explore potential sensorimotor neuroplasticity underying stroke.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, HK

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Delivering Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) primed with continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to the primary motor cortex (M1) may enhance the facilitatory effect of iTBS on the stimulated M1 through metaplasticity. Previous studies have verified the effectiveness of priming iTBS on improving motor rehabilitation in patients with stroke. However, the optimal time interval between cTBS and iTBS remains unknown. The aim of this clinical trial is to identify the effect of different time intervals between cTBS and iTBS, followed with a standard robot-assisted training (RAT) for sensorimotor rehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke. Using electroencephalography (EEG) to explore potential sensorimotor neuroplasticity. A three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be performed with an estimated total of 30 patients with chronic stroke. All participants will be randomly allocated to receive 10-session intervention of different TBS protocols (i.e., cTBS-3min interval-iTBS, cTBS-10min interval-iTBS and cTBS-20min interval-iTBS), delivered for 2-4 sessions per week, lasting for 3-4 weeks. All participants will receive a 20-minute standard RAT after each stimulation session. Primary outcome will be Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores (FMA-UE). Secondary outcomes will be Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), kinematic outcomes generated during RAT as well as EEG.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  • the first-ever stroke with unilateral hemiplegia.
  • 18-75 years old.
  • chronic stroke ( ≥ 6 months).
  • residual hemiparetic upper limb functional level in the Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE-HK) ≥ 2.
  • can understand and read Chinese.
  • signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of any clinically significant or unstable medical disorder.
  • any contraindications to TMS based on the TMS safety guidelines (Rossi, Hallett, Rossini, & Pascual-Leone, 2011).
  • inability to follow treatment instructions due to severe cognitive (using the Hong Kong version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-HK) < 22/30) and communication deficiency.
  • extreme spasticity over the hemiparetic upper limb (Modified Ashworth Score>2) or severe pain that hindered movement.
  • a history of neurological or psychiatric disease excluding stroke, or current use of psychoactive medication (sedatives, antipsychotics, antidepressants, etc.).

Treatment and study plan

Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS)

Device

Standard 600-pulse continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) can inhibit the corticomotor excitability. The cTBS will be delivered with an intensity of 70% individual resting motor threshold (RMT) of the hand knob over the contralesional M1.

Other names: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)

Device

Standard 600-pulse intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can increase the corticomotor excitability. The iTBS will be delivered with an intensity of 70% individual resting motor threshold (RMT) of the hand knob over the contralesional M1.

Robot-assisted training

Device

Fourier M2 upper limb rehabilitation robot (Fourier Intelligence Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China), will be used for upper limb proximal joints training. Fourier M2 upper limb rehab robot is an end-effector robot-assisted device. The device targets (1) flexion and extension of shoulder joint, (2) flexion and extension of elbow, (3) internal and external rotation of shoulder joint, and (4) abduction and adduction of shoulder joint, supported by tailored interactive TV games in the device.

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper extremity (FMA-UE)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, prior to first treatment), Day 21 (immediately after 10th treatment) , 1 month after completion of treatment

    Fugl-Meyer Assessment of upper extremity (FMA-UE) scale is an index to assess the sensorimotor impairment in individuals who have had stroke. It contains motor assessment and sensory assessment. The motor parts includes 33 items assessing the movement, coordination and reflex actions of the shoulder, elbow, forearm and wrist, as well as the hand joints of the paretic arm. Each item consists of a three-point scale (0, 1 and 2), with a total maximum score of 66. The sensory component consists of 6 items assessing light touch and position of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and thumb. Each item consists of a three-point scale (0, 1, and 2) with a total score of 12 points.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, prior to first treatment), Day 21 (immediately after 10th treatment) , 1 month after completion of treatment

    The ARAT is a clinical assessment for upper limb functional activities for patients with stroke, which mainly focuses on the proximal and distal upper limb function. It consists of four subscales: grasp, grip, pinch and gross movement. It has 19 movement tasks, each graded using a four-point scale (total scores range from 0 to 57) (McDonnell, 2008). The MCID of ARAT is 5.70 points (Van der Lee et al., 2001).

Other outcomes

  1. Sensorimotor event-related desynchronization

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, prior to first treatment), Day 1 (immediately after first treatment), Day 21 (immediately after 10th treatment)

    Electroencephalographical assessment for cortical activation induced by movement and mirror visual feedback-based observation of movement

  2. Sensory evoked potential

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, prior to first treatment), Day 1 (immediately after first treatment), Day 21 (immediately after 10th treatment)

    Electroencephalographical assessment for cortical activation induced by periphral magenetic stimulation over the bilateral forearm.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Other

Registry information

Acronym: TMS

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Sep 25, 2024
Registry last updated
Jan 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.