CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, 30029, France
NCT Number: NCT04802226
It has been shown that self-excluded gamblers are very heavy gamblers, and that it is not possible to distinguish between those who report self-exclusion for addictive reasons and those who self-exclude for commercial reasons, which strongly suggests that all self-excluded people are "self-diagnosed" problem gamblers. Several studies converge in recognizing self-excluded people as problem gamblers who have lost control of their gambling and are seeking to protect themselves by taking action, self-exclusion, to change their behaviour and protect themselves.
Several reviews of the literature on interventions for problem gamblers have recently identified self-exclusion as an intervention for problem gamblers.
However, the effectiveness of the current self-exclusion system appears to be limited, particularly for short self-exclusions and for heavier gamblers.
Considering that self-exclusion is an intervention for and by people who have developed a gambling disorder, it currently consists exclusively of a behavioural intervention, in the sense that it prevents the behaviour. It would then be possible to optimize this intervention by enriching it with other components that have been shown to be effective with problem gamblers or in other addictions: a brief intervention including a motivational, cognitive approach, personalized normative feedback, referral to online help services (cresus and gambling infoservice), and repeated contact to suggest an extension of the self-exclusion period without having to return to the gambling environment. We hypothesize improved efficacy as measured by reduced gambling for longer after an initial optimized self-exclusion compared to self-exclusion with the standard procedure. Days will be randomized according to an a priori randomization list, not players.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Nîmes, 30029, France
Main Objective:
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of the optimized self-exclusion procedure, compared to the existing procedure, on the intensity of gambling.
2.2 Secondary objectives The secondary objectives of the study are to assess early effect at 6 months and maintenance of effect at 18 months.
The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate early efficacy at 6 months and maintenance of efficacy at 18 months. The endpoint used is the change in total net loss over the last 4 weeks, between the last 4 weeks prior to self-exclusion, and the last 4 weeks at 6 T1 and 18 months T3. The other criteria will be the change between T0 and T1,2, and 3 of the following variables (total of the last 4 weeks unless otherwise specified):
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
self exclusion procedure( responsible gambling tool)
Time frame: between the last 4 weeks before self-exclusion T0, and the last 4 weeks at 12 months T2
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Other
Acronym: OSE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.