Pulmonary vein isolation
DevicePVI
NCT Number: NCT07238452
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Heart Failure (HF) are colliding global cardiovascular epidemics, individually impairing quality of life and cardiac performance, as well as increasing the risk of hospitalisation and mortality. When AF and HF co-exist, disease progression accelerates and the adverse outcomes are magnified, leading to incrementally higher morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure. The management of AF has been dichotomised into the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm ("Rhythm control") or acceptance of AF with control of the ventricular response ("Rate control"). Previous studies suggested that pharmacologic rhythm control and pharmacologic rate control confer similar survival and morbidity outcomes in patients with significant left ventricular dysfunction. Recognising the limitations of pharmacotherapy, more recent studies have examined the utility of catheter ablation procedures, either designed to restore and maintain sinus rhythm (e.g., catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation) or control the ventricular response (e.g., pacemaker implantation in combination with catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction). Compared to pharmacotherapy, these studies have suggested that catheter ablation may provide sustained improvements in quality of life, decreased hospitalisation and, potentially, improved survival for patients with co-existing AF and HF. However, these studies were performed prior to the modern era of quadruple LV enhancing therapy (beta-blocker, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and an SGLT2 inhibitor). The true impact of catheter-based interventions, and thus the optimal management of AF for patients with co-existing HF is not known. The investigators propose a randomised controlled trial to definitively answer the question regarding the optimal invasive treatment of AF in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF - LVEF ≤ 40%).
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified19 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
PVI
AVJ
Rate
Time frame: 5 years
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 5 years
Time frame: 5 years
Time frame: 5 years
Time frame: 5 years
Time frame: 5 years
Time frame: 5 years
Time frame: 5 years
Time frame: 5 years
Time frame: 5 years
Time frame: 5 years
Time frame: 5 years
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of British Columbia
Other
Acronym: OPTIMAL AF-HF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06369298
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Alexander City, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05795400
Amyloid Cardiomyopathy, Amyloid Neuropathies
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT06299436
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiovascular Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05987670
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
London, United Kingdom
View Trial Details