Repeated Examinations for Typing Pulmonary Embolism
NCT07491094
Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinical Deterioration
Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT07436702
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular mortality worldwide. Current guidelines recommend early reperfusion for high-risk and intermediate-high-risk PE, yet systemic thrombolysis and percutaneous therapies are frequently underutilized, and no specific timing for reperfusion is defined, unlike in acute myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke. As most PE-related in-hospital deaths occur within the first hours and thrombus composition changes over time, defining an optimal reperfusion time window may improve survival and prevent hemodynamic deterioration. We therefore propose a national, multicenter, prospective observational study to evaluate the prognostic impact of reperfusion timing, using systemic thrombolysis or catheter-directed therapies, on in-hospital mortality and haemorrhagic or cardiovascular complications.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
UO Unità di Cure Intensive Cardiologiche e Cardiologia 1, Ospedale Niguarda, Milano, Milan, Milano, Italy
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is currently the third leading cause of cardiovascular mortality worldwide. According to international guidelines, patients who are hemodynamically unstable at presentation (classified as high-risk according to the current European Society of Cardiology classification) and those at intermediate-high risk-defined as patients who are hemodynamically stable at admission but present with right ventricular dysfunction and positive cardiac ischemia biomarkers and subsequently develop sudden hemodynamic deterioration, should undergo reperfusion as early as possible.
At present, reperfusion in these patients is mainly achieved through systemic thrombolysis or percutaneous treatments. However, these strategies are frequently underutilized because of patients' comorbidities and bleeding risk. Notably, current international guidelines do not define a specific time window within which reperfusion should be performed using either approach, in contrast to what is well established in guidelines for acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke.
Given that most in-hospital deaths related to PE occur within the first hours after symptom onset and hospital admission, and considering that the histological composition of thrombi undergoes time-dependent changes that may partially reduce the effectiveness of reperfusion therapies, identifying a temporal cutoff within which reperfusion confers maximal clinical benefit would be highly relevant. Such a cutoff could improve both patient survival and the prevention of hemodynamic deterioration when performing systemic or percutaneous reperfusion.
To address this knowledge gap, we propose a national, multicenter, prospective observational study that could also could serve as a platform for registry-based randomized clinical trials. The primary aim of the study is to identify optimal management strategies for patients with intermediate-high-risk or high-risk PE, with a particular focus on the most appropriate timing of systemic reperfusion or catheter-directed therapies (CDTs), when indicated, and to evaluate their prognostic impact. Specifically, the study will assess the relationship between reperfusion timing (systemic thrombolysis or CDTs) and in-hospital mortality. Additionally, the association between different reperfusion time windows and the occurrence of haemorrhagic or cardiovascular complications will be evaluated.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 30 days
Correlation between time to reperfusion (measured in hours from hospital admission to initiation of systemic thrombolysis or catheter-directed therapies [CDTs]) and in-hospital mortality rate (rate of patients) among patients with intermediate-high- and high-risk acute pulmonary embolism.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 30 days
Association between different reperfusion time windows and techniques and the occurrence of haemorrhagic or cardiovascular complications among patients with intermediate-high and high-risk with acute pulmonary embolism
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Azienda ULSS 8 Berica
Other
Acronym: OPTIRAPE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07491094
Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinical Deterioration
Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT07527117
Cardiovascular Diseases, Disease
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07499661
Acute Heart Failure (AHF), Cardiovascular Diseases
Agen, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07143539
Anxiety Depression, Anxiety Disorders
Aarau, Switzerland
View Trial Details