Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07316504

Optimal Strategy to Correct Stent underexpAnsion in Resistant Lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) accounts for 5-10% of PCI. ISR may be linked to mechanical complications mainly under-expansion (UE), neointimal hyperplasia and/or neoatherosclerosis. International guidelines recommends non-compliant and very-high-pressure balloons, which lead to sub-optimal angiographic and clinical results. Recently, observational studies have suggested the feasibility and safety of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in UE treatment. There are no prospective randomised controlled studies comparing intravascular lithotripsy with balloons in ISR with UE.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

In-stent restenosis (ISR) angioplasties account for between 5 and 10% of Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Several mechanisms are causing RIS, including neointimal hyperplasia, neoatherosclerosis, and/or mechanical complications, mainly stent under-expansion. In addition, the calcified lesions associated with stent under-expansion are under-diagnosed in angiography as shown by intra-coronary imaging studies. The stent under-expansion is defined as a ratio between the minimum intrastent surface area and the average vessel lumen of <80%. Currently, the management of these lesions is not codified and consists empirically of the use of non-compliant balloons, cutting balloons, and/or very high-pressure balloons. These treatments result in suboptimal angiographic results, with clinical consequences in terms of revascularization recurrence (angina, unstable angina, and in 25% of cases, acute coronary syndrome).

A growing interest in intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) use to treat these calcified lesions with stent underexpansion appears as an appealing option for a safe procedure but without robust data on efficacy. Furthermore, guidelines published in 2020 by the expert consensus of the EAPCI (European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions) classified IVL among the therapeutic strategy indicated in stent under-expansion with calcified lesions. The OSCAR study is a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial investigating the use of IVL compared to other standard strategies in the treatment of in-stent restenosis with under-expansion.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient who have undergone coronary angiography with ISR, defined as ≥50% reduction of the diameter of the intrastent lumen occurring ≥ 6 months after stent implantation
  • And with a suspicion of stent under-expansion on angiography, possibly assisted by a stent enhancement technique
  • The reference diameter of the target vessel must be ≥2.5 mm and ≤5.0 mm.
  • Coronary flow must be TIMI 3
  • Ability to cross the lesion with the OCT catheter (possibly after predilatation with a balloon up to 2 mm)
  • Patient affiliated to the French National Health Insurance

Exclusion criteria

  • Heart failure with NYHA III or IV (or cardiogenic shock)
  • LVEF <20%
  • Chronic renal failure with clearance <30mL/mn according to CKD
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Patient with a condition/comorbidity that could reduce compliance with the protocol, including pre-specified study follow-up
  • Patient participating in another ongoing medical study evaluating a pharmacological or biological agent or medical device, unless authorized by the concomitant protocol.
  • Patient unable to tolerate double antiaggregation (i.e., aspirin and clopidogrel or prasugrel or ticagrelor) for at least 6 months.
  • Possible or defined thrombus (by angiography or endovascular imaging) in the target vessel.

Treatment and study plan

Intravascular lithotripsy

Procedure

ISR with UE will be treated by intravascular lithotripsy

Balloon

Procedure

ISR with UE will be treated with non compliant balloons, very high-pressure balloons, cutting balloons

Primary outcomes

  1. Post PCI Stent expansion

    Time frame: At enrollment

    Minimal stent area (MSA)/average reference vessel area

Secondary outcomes

  1. Minimal stent area >4.5mm2 or Stent expansion ≥80%

    Time frame: At enrollment

    Number of patients with Efficiency (yes/no) Efficiency defined by: optimal stent expansion (Minimal Stent Area [MSA]/mean reference vessel diameter ≥ 80%) and/or MSA > 4.5 mm².

  2. Successful lithotripsy catheter delivery

    Time frame: At enrollment

    Number of patients with successful lithotripsy catheter delivery

  3. Procedural success evaluated by the occurence of the clinical events below

    Time frame: Day 1 - Day 7

    Procedural success is defined as residual stenosis < 50% or MSA > 4.5 mm2 and no angiographic complications (i.e., acute dissection (types B to F), perforation, acute vessel obstruction, persistent slow flow, or no reflow) or distal embolization.

    • Residual stenosis < 50% post-procedure (assessed by Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA))
    • No significant stent malapposition
    • Target lesion failure defined as: cardiac death, myocardial infarction (unless clearly attributable to a vessel other than the target vessel) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) during index hospitalization (Day 1-Day 7).
    • Target Vessel Failure (TVF) defined as: cardiac death, myocardial infarction (unless clearly attributable to a vessel other than the target vessel) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) during index hospitalization (Day 1-Day 7).
  4. Peri-procedural complications evaluated by the occurence of the clinical events below

    Time frame: Day 1- Day 7

    • Coronary arteries: Dissection (A-F), persistent slow flow, no reflow, perforation, embolization, acute vessel occlusion, side branch occlusion (>1.5 mm, final TIMI flow)
    • Peri-procedural infarction
    • Vascular access complications: dissection, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, hemorrhage
    • Radiation protection parameters: procedure time (min), air kerma, total dose-area product (DAP), iodine quantity (ml)
  5. Safety criteria evaluated by the occurence of the clinical events below

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of study at Month 36

    • All-cause mortality
    • Cardiovascular mortality
    • Peri-procedural myocardial infarction
    • Spontaneous myocardial infarction
    • Probable or definite stent thrombosis
    • Stroke
    • Major bleeding
  6. Efficiency criteria evaluated by any of the clinical events described below

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of study at Month 36

    • Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
    • Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)
    • Target Vessel Non-Target lesion Revascularization (TV-NTLR)
    • Non-Target Vessel Revascularization (NTVR)
    • Any hospitalization (for cardiac reasons or related to the procedure)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Lise Laclautre, Pharm.D

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33473754963

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Other

Registry information

Acronym: OSCAR

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2031
First posted
Jan 5, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.