Intravascular lithotripsy
ProcedureISR with UE will be treated by intravascular lithotripsy
NCT Number: NCT07316504
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) accounts for 5-10% of PCI. ISR may be linked to mechanical complications mainly under-expansion (UE), neointimal hyperplasia and/or neoatherosclerosis. International guidelines recommends non-compliant and very-high-pressure balloons, which lead to sub-optimal angiographic and clinical results. Recently, observational studies have suggested the feasibility and safety of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in UE treatment. There are no prospective randomised controlled studies comparing intravascular lithotripsy with balloons in ISR with UE.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Clermont Ferrand Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, France
In-stent restenosis (ISR) angioplasties account for between 5 and 10% of Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Several mechanisms are causing RIS, including neointimal hyperplasia, neoatherosclerosis, and/or mechanical complications, mainly stent under-expansion. In addition, the calcified lesions associated with stent under-expansion are under-diagnosed in angiography as shown by intra-coronary imaging studies. The stent under-expansion is defined as a ratio between the minimum intrastent surface area and the average vessel lumen of <80%. Currently, the management of these lesions is not codified and consists empirically of the use of non-compliant balloons, cutting balloons, and/or very high-pressure balloons. These treatments result in suboptimal angiographic results, with clinical consequences in terms of revascularization recurrence (angina, unstable angina, and in 25% of cases, acute coronary syndrome).
A growing interest in intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) use to treat these calcified lesions with stent underexpansion appears as an appealing option for a safe procedure but without robust data on efficacy. Furthermore, guidelines published in 2020 by the expert consensus of the EAPCI (European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions) classified IVL among the therapeutic strategy indicated in stent under-expansion with calcified lesions. The OSCAR study is a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial investigating the use of IVL compared to other standard strategies in the treatment of in-stent restenosis with under-expansion.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
ISR with UE will be treated by intravascular lithotripsy
ISR with UE will be treated with non compliant balloons, very high-pressure balloons, cutting balloons
Time frame: At enrollment
Minimal stent area (MSA)/average reference vessel area
Time frame: At enrollment
Number of patients with Efficiency (yes/no) Efficiency defined by: optimal stent expansion (Minimal Stent Area [MSA]/mean reference vessel diameter ≥ 80%) and/or MSA > 4.5 mm².
Time frame: At enrollment
Number of patients with successful lithotripsy catheter delivery
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 7
Procedural success is defined as residual stenosis < 50% or MSA > 4.5 mm2 and no angiographic complications (i.e., acute dissection (types B to F), perforation, acute vessel obstruction, persistent slow flow, or no reflow) or distal embolization.
Time frame: Day 1- Day 7
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of study at Month 36
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of study at Month 36
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Other
Acronym: OSCAR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00264264
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07649798
Bifurcation Coronary Artery Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Asunción, Paraguay
View Trial DetailsNCT04318990
Coronary Angiography, Coronary Angioplasty
Plano, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03329261
Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Angioplasty
Ben Arous, Tunisia
View Trial Details