Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01017497

Optimal Planning Target Volume With Stereotactic Radiosurgery

The purpose of this study is to estimate the rate of local control at the treated site of the metastasis as a function of 1mm versus 3mm expansion about the gross tumor volume (GTV). Each lesion, not each patient will be ranndomized to either the 1mm or 3mm margin with 40 lesions randomized to each arm.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

About this study

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used either as definitive treatment alone or as a "boost" in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for the treatment of brain metastases. To establish a target for SRS, the gross tumor volume (GTV) is typically defined as the contrast-enhancing volume on T1-weighted axial MRI images. In turn, the volume chosen for treatment (the planning target volume or PTV) is generated by expanding the GTV to account for microscopic extension of tumor beyond the MRI-visualized volume and deviations in patient positioning at the time of treatment., However, the optimal PTV in patients undergoing SRS of brain metastases has not been established.

This pilot randomized study of approximately 49 patients (representing a total of 80 brain lesions) should be sufficient to explore the effect of margin expansion around the GTV for brain metastases. The patients enrolled in this study will undergo radiosurgery to a planning treatment volume generated by expanding the GTV of each lesion by either a 1mm or 3mm margin. Each lesion, not each patient, will be randomized to receive either the 1mm or 3mm margin with 40 lesions randomized to each arm (a patient with multiple lesions potentially could have a lesion randomized to the 1mm arm and a different lesion randomized to the 3mm arm). The primary outcome of 12-month local recurrence and the secondary outcome of the rate of radionecrosis at the SRS treatment site will be lesion-specific outcomes. All other secondary outcomes will be patient-specific outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >18 years
  • Life expectancy of at least 6 months.
  • Karnofsky Performance Score greater than 70
  • Graded prognostic assessment (GPA score 0.5 or greater
  • 1 to 3 brain metastases unresectable
  • Maximum tumor diameter no larger than 4cm

Exclusion criteria

  • Primary lesion with radiosensitive histology (such as: small cell carcinoma, germ-cell tumors, lymphoma, leukemia, and multiple myeloma.
  • Metastases in the brain stem, pons or medulla or within 5 mm of optic apparatus
  • Previous cranial radiation
  • Pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Radiation

PTV Diameter < 2.0 cm receives 24 Gy; PTV Diameter 2.0-3.0 cm receives 18 Gy; PTV Diameter 3.1-4.0 cm receives 15 Gy;

Primary outcomes

  1. 12-month Local Control Rate

    Time frame: 12 months after SRS

    The 12-month local control rate is the percentage of lesions without recurrence at the lesion site 12 months after SRS. Time to local recurrence was defined as the time between SRS and local recurrence. If local recurrence did not occur, the time to local recurrence was censored at last follow-up (including deaths without local recurrence). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to describe the time to local recurrence.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Radionecrosis at SRS Treatment Site

    Time frame: 24 months after SRS

    The rate of radionecrosis is defined as the proportion of lesions with an indication of radiation-associated changes but no evidence of viable tumor on follow-up imaging (and confirmed by tissue biopsy whenever possible).

  2. 12 Month Rate of Distant Brain Metastases

    Time frame: 12 month after SRS

    The 12-month rate of distant brain metastases is defined as the percentage of participants with the appearance of new brain metastasis located away from the previously treated lesion (i.e. distant brain failure) 12 months after SRS. Time to the appearance of new brain metastasis was defined as the time between SRS and distant brain failure. Patients without new distant brain metastases as of the last follow-up were censored at the last follow-up date. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to describe the time to distant brain failure.

  3. Median Overall Survival

    Time frame: 24 months after SRS

    Overall survival was defined as the time in months from the start of SRS to the date of death or last contact if alive. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival.

  4. Quality of Life at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months after SRS

    Quality of life as measured by the change in FACT-Br scores from baseline to 3 months after SRS. The FACT-Br (version 4) is comprised of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), a 27-item core questionnaire evaluating the domains of physical, family/social, emotional and functional well-being, with the addition of 23 brain cancer specific questions. The FACT-G total score is the sum of the four FACT-G domain scores. The Brain Cancer Subscale (BrCS) is the sum of 19 brain cancer specific questions. The FACT-Br Trial Outcome Index (TOI) is the sum of the BrCS score and the physical and family/social domain scores. The FACT-Br total score is the sum of the FACT-G total score and the BrCS score. Change score = score at 3 months after SRS - score at baseline. Positive change scores indicate improved quality of life.

  5. Cognition at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months after SRS

    Cognition as measured by the change in MMSE scores from baseline to 3 months after SRS. The MMSE is an 11-item measure that tests five areas of cognitive function: orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall and language. The minimum score is 0 and teh maximum score is 30 with higher MMSe scores indicating better cognition. Change score = score at 3 months after SRS - score at baseline. Positive change scores indicate improved cognition.

  6. Cognition at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Trail Making Test (TMT)

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 months after SRS

    Cognition as measured by the change in scores on the Trail Making Test (TMT) from baseline to 3 months after SRS. The TMT consists of two parts. Part A (TMT-A) requires an individual to draw lines sequentially connecting 25 encircled numbers distributed on a sheet of paper. Task requirements are similar for Part B (TMT-B) except the person must alternate between numbers and letters (e.g., 1, A, 2, B, 3, C, etc.). The score on each part represents the amount of time required to complete the task. Change score = score at 3 months after SRS - score at baseline. Negative change scores indicate improved cognition.

  7. Rate of Death Due to Neurologic Causes

    Time frame: 24 months after SRS

    The rate of death due to neurologic causes is defined as the percentage of participants whose death is attributable to the progression of neurological disease.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Duke University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Determination of the Optimal Planning Target Volume for Brain Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Nov 20, 2009
Registry last updated
Feb 13, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.