University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust
Coventry, CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT02558036
Optimal patient head and neck position when performing videolaryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation has not yet been established.The investigators aim to assess the effect of two different positions on the laryngeal view obtained and success of tracheal intubation during videolaryngoscopy with two commercially available and well established videolaryngoscopes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Coventry, CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
The optimum patient head and neck position for direct laryngoscopy (when the anaesthetist views the larynx with a curved metallic blade before passing a tube for ventilation of the lungs) is traditionally considered to be the "sniffing the morning air" (neck flexion and head extension) position. This has been questioned previously as there is no randomized controlled study to date to explore this statement. The patient should be optimally positioned prior to induction of anaesthesia, especially because in the event of an unexpected difficult intubation, the Difficult Airway Society guidelines suggest the use of an alternative laryngoscope. In current clinical practice a videolaryngoscope (a curved blade with a camera attached to it that allows the anaesthetist to see around corners) has been used as an alternative laryngoscope. To the best of our knowledge, the ideal patient position for videolaryngoscopy has not yet been described. The intubation time and rate of success at intubation using a C-Mac D-Blade videolaryngoscope was previously assessed by Serocki et al, but only in the sniffing position. It is possible that adopting a different position when using the C-Mac D- Blade might result in a superior view of the larynx. Furthermore, the optimal patient position has not yet been assessed for intubation with the King Vision videolaryngoscope.
This key information could gain precious seconds in a difficult airway scenario (when securing the airway with a tube for ventilation proves difficult) and has obvious implications for patient management. The answer to this question could also help the anaesthetists take informed decisions when using videolaryngoscopy to intubate the trachea in elective settings. The investigators aim to assess the effect of two different positions on the laryngeal view obtained during videolaryngoscopy with two commercially available and well established videolaryngoscopes to try and answer this question.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Using C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope patients will be positioned the neutral Head and Neck Position
Using the King Vision Videolaryngoscope patients will be positioned in the neutral Head and Neck Position
Time frame: 6 months
This will be assessed using a Difficult Intubation Scale Score for each of the 2 videolaryngoscopes used in the study, which will be assessed in both neutral and sniffing positions.
Time frame: Less than 1 minute
From when the laryngoscope enters the mouth until achieving the best view of the larynx.
Time frame: Less than 1 minute
from entering the mouth with the videolaryngoscope until endotracheal tube is inserted in the wind-pipe and the capnography trace is first visible on the screen.
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Other
Optimal Head and Neck Position for Intubation During Videolaryngoscopy: Comparison Between "Sniffing" and Neutral Position Using Channelled and Non-channelled Videolaryngoscopes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.