Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT05495230
Chronic diseases and multimorbidity are increasingly prevalent. However, over the last decades, attempts at improving primary care for chronic diseases have been focussed on the management of individual chronic diseases and single disease management (SDM) programs have been implemented in Dutch primary care. This causes multiple problems for patients with one or more chronic diseases, such as negative interaction between treatment of single diseases, high treatment burden, negative patient experiences, lack of attention for problems in other domains of life that may interact with the chronic disease, and difficulties in shared decision making by the use of strict protocols in SDM programs. A person-centred and holistic approach is widely recognized as the solution to the problems observed in chronic disease care. Therefore, we guided three large Dutch primary care cooperatives, who have been organizing SDM programmes on diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2), COPD, and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in primary care for the last decades, with the development of a new generic disease management (GDM) programme including a person-centered and holistic approach (CMO 2019-5756). The three primary care cooperatives have recently conducted a pilot study in which we evaluated the feasibility of the programme (CMO 2021-8106) to further optimise its content and procedures. In the coming years, all three primary care cooperatives will gradually implement the optimised programme in all general practices in their regions. In the current study, our aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of the GDM programme on Quadruple Aim outcomes, i.e. patient experiences, population health, health care provider experiences, and cost effectiveness. We will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial in the three primary care cooperatives with a follow-up of 12 months. Fifteen practices will be randomised to either care as usual according to the current SDM programmes, or to the GDM programme including a person-centered and holistic care approach. Approximately 40 patients per practice with DM2, COPD and/or CVD will be recruited.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Rationale: Chronic diseases and multimorbidity are increasingly prevalent. However, over the last decades, attempts at improving primary care for chronic diseases have been focussed on the management of individual chronic diseases and single disease management (SDM) programs have been implemented in Dutch primary care. This causes multiple problems for patients with one or more chronic diseases, such as negative interaction between treatment of single diseases, high treatment burden, negative patient experiences, lack of attention for problems in other domains of life that may interact with the chronic disease, and difficulties in shared decision making by the use of strict protocols in SDM programs. A person-centred and holistic approach is widely recognized as the solution to the problems observed in chronic disease care. Therefore, we guided three large Dutch primary care cooperatives, who have been organizing SDM programmes on diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2), COPD, and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in primary care for the last decades, with the development of a new generic disease management (GDM) programme including a person-centered and holistic approach (CMO 2019-5756). The three primary care cooperatives have recently conducted a pilot study in which we evaluated the feasibility of the programme (CMO 2021-8106) to further optimise its content and procedures. In the coming years, all three primary care cooperatives will gradually implement the optimised programme in all general practices in their regions.
Objective: In the current study, our aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of the GDM programme on Quadruple Aim outcomes, i.e. patient experiences, population health, health care provider experiences, and cost effectiveness.
Study design: we will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial in the three primary care cooperatives with a follow-up of 12 months. Fifteen practices will be randomised to either care as usual according to the current SDM programmes, or to the GDM programme including a person-centered and holistic care approach. Approximately 40 patients per practice with DM2, COPD and/or CVD will be recruited.
Study population: all patients with DM2, COPD and/or CVD who currently receive SDM according to the SDM programmes of the participating primary care cooperatives are eligible to participate.
Intervention: a GDM programme including person-centered and holistic care. This programme will replace the SDM programmes for DM2, COPD and CVD that are currently used in the participating primary care cooperatives.
Main study parameters/endpoints: effectiveness will be evaluated by Quadruple Aim outcomes at baseline, at 6 months, and at 12 months follow-up by comparing changes in the intervention group with the comparator group. Patient experiences will be measured with the P3CEQ questionnaire. Population health will be measured with the PROMIS Global-10 questionnaire. Self-management will be measured with the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) score. Healthcare professional experiences will be measured with the MASGZ and the COPILOT questionnaire. Data for calculating costs and conducting a cost-effectiveness analyses will be measured by the Medical Consumption questionnaire and the EQ-5D questionnaire and by process outcomes such as the number and type of consultations and referrals, and duration of consultations from the Electronical Medical Files. At 12 months, a purposive sample of patients and professionals will participate in focus group interviews to collect information on experiences and facilitators and barriers for further implementation. Also, the competences needed by the healthcare professionals to provide personalised and integrated chronic care will be explored.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
See arm description.
See arm description.
Time frame: 12 months
% difference between intervention group and control group of dichotomous composite score ( yes / no MCID improvement in health-related quality of life or quality of healthcare), which is based on the scores of PROMIS dimensions (GPH, GPM) and the P3CEQ-score.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Physical aspect of health-related quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Global 10 instrument (T-scores; higher T-score indicates better physical aspect of HrQoL)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Mental aspect of health-related quality of life as measured by the PROMIS-Global 10 instrument (T-scores; higher T-score indicates better mental aspect of HrQoL)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Person-centredness of care as measured by the Person Centred Coordinated Care Experience Questionnaire (P3CEQ) instrument; minimum score 0, maximum score 30, higher score equals better P3CE.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Patient activation as measured by the Patient Activation Measure instrument; minimum 0, maximum 100, higher score equals better patient activation.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Health-related quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument; minimum 0, maximum 1, higher score equals better HrQoL
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Health care use (number of consultations, number of hospital visits) according to Medical Consumption Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Combined length and weight according to practice data
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
According to practice data
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
According to practice data
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
According to practice data
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
According to practice data
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Satisfaction with job according to selection of MAS-GZ instrument (minimum 8, maximum 40, higher score indicates higher positive affect)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Satisfaction with job according to selection of CO-PILOT instrument (minimum 1, maximum 10, higher score is better experience of healthcare providers)
Radboud University Medical Center
Other
tOwards a Patient Centred mulTIMorbidity Approach FOR Chronic Disease MAnagement in Primary Care (OPTIMA FORMA) PHASE 3: Cluster Randomized Controlled Evaluation Study
Acronym: OPTIMAFORMA3
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05481593
Chronic Condition, Chronic Conditions, Multiple
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05775653
Chronic Condition, Chronic Conditions, Multiple
Frederiksberg, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07075536
Behavior, Chronic Condition
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06064110
Chronic Condition, Chronic Disease
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
View Trial Details