Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
NCT Number: NCT03135431
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety of performing a bilateral tubal ligation vs. bilateral salpingectomy, two procedures performed for permanent sterilization, at the time of cesarean delivery. The investigators want to determine if performing bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery poses any greater risk for blood loss, as compared to a bilateral tubal ligation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
A non-inferiority, two-arm randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy at the time of a cesarean delivery will be conducted as an initiative to avoid a missed opportunity in the primary prevention of ovarian cancer. Once enrolled and consented, women will be randomized using a stratified block randomization algorithm according to number of prior cesarean deliveries and BMI to either salpingectomy or bilateral tubal ligation. The data collection will include preoperative CBC, time of procedure, postoperative CBC at 24 hours, standard patient demographics, procedural complications, estimated blood loss, return to the OR, length of stay, pain scores, and postoperative complications, including readmission within 6 weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Surgical removal of entire fallopian tubes
Surgical tying, cutting, or removal of a portion of the fallopian tubes
Time frame: At least 24 but not greater than 48 hours after surgery
Identify the mean difference in pre and postoperative hemoglobin for patients undergoing salpingectomy for sterilization vs. patients undergoing standard bilateral tubal ligation via mid-segment resection of the fallopian tube at the time of cesarean delivery.
Time frame: Day of surgery
Compare mean difference in length of operative time (in minutes) to perform bilateral salpingectomy as compared to standard bilateral tubal ligation, following cesarean delivery.
Time frame: Day of surgery
Identify mean difference in estimated total blood loss as a result of standard bilateral tubal ligation surgical procedure and bilateral salpingectomy procedure, following cesarean delivery.
Mayo Clinic
Other
Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Safety of Salpingectomy vs Tubal Ligation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06557499
Contraception
Berkeley, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07326007
Contraception
Giza, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05732142
Contraception, Gender Equity
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03127722
Contraception
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details