Assuit university
Asyut, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06872970
Outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation of femoral neck fractures using dynamic hip screw versus cannulated screws combined with medial buttress plate.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me16 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Asyut, Egypt
-Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in patients under the age of 50 years account for less than 5% of all hip fractures and are typically the result of a high-energy event.
FNFs in young patients, particularly displaced fractures, are challenging to treat. Internal fixation remains the consensus, and the quality of the reduction is more important than the time to surgery.
Femoral head necrosis and fracture nonunion have always been the two major complications of femoral neck fracture treatment, which greatly increases the difficulty of treatment and places a high burden on social and medical resources.
As previous studies have demonstrated, reoperation rate for a failure of internal fixation ranges from 10% to 48.8% and has remained largely unchanged over the past 30 years.
There are many options to treat femoral neck fracture. Previous studies reported that femoral neck fractures with following surgery are associated implant failure.
Currently, the most common types of fixation include cannulated screws, hip screw systems, proximal femur plates, and cephalomedullary nails. [7]
Arthroplasty may be an option for elderly patients, but is generally not feasible for young patients; young patients with FNF require a more durable and promising fixation. However, there is no consensus on the best fixation method for FNF in young patients.
CS has better biomedical properties such as anti-rotation and less invasive, which was widely used in non-displaced intracapsular fractures.
DHS could maintain the neck-shaft angle and anatomical reduction, which is helpful for fracture fixation.
A medial buttress plate can clamp the fracture apex, neutralize shearing forces, and transfer them into compressive forces into the plane of cannulated screws or other typical construct.
Thus far, there has been no optimal internal fixation method.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Open reduction of femoral neck using watson jones or smith peterson approach fractures then fixation of fractures by dynamic hip screws
Open reduction of femoral neck fractures then fixation of fractures by cannulated screws and medial buttress plate
Time frame: 3 years
Using harris hip score evaluate to evaluate post operative:
Samer youssef mansour meglaa
Other
Outcomes of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures Using Dynamic Hip Screw vs Cannulated Screws and Medial Buttress Plate
Acronym: OR FNFS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05505604
Femoral Fractures, Femoral Neck Fractures
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05144191
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04900506
Bone Mineral Density, Femoral Fractures
Arendal, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT05164081
Femoral Fractures, Femoral Neck Fractures
Umeå, Västerbotten County, Sweden
View Trial Details