Tezepelumab
Combination ProductIMP. Subcutaneous injection. Unit dose strengths 210 mg.
Other names: TEZSPIRE®
NCT Number: NCT06473779
The objective of this study is to assess the potential for tezepelumab-treated patients (subcutaneous administration) to reduce maintenance therapy without loss of asthma control in adolescent and adults with severe asthma..
Study details include:
1. The study duration will be up to 72 weeks. 2. The treatment duration will be up to 68 weeks. 3. The visit frequency will be once every 4 weeks (Q4W).
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
12 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Research Site, Berazategui, Argentina
This is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase IIIb study to assess the potential for tezepelumab-treated patients to (1) reduce maintenance therapy without the loss of asthma control at Week 56, among those who demonstrated asthma control or low biomarkers at Week 24, and (2) be in asthma control and have characteristics of clinical remission at Week 24.
Approximately 65 sites in 10 countries will enrol adult and adolescent patients with severe uncontrolled asthma.
The study is divided into 5 phases as described below:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
at Visit 1 (Screening):
Informed Consent
Age
Type of Patient and Disease Characteristics
(i) Methacholine - PD20 ≤ 8 mg/mL (ii) Mannitol - PD15 15% drop on FEV1 out of dose < than 635 mg of inhaled mannitol (iii) Exercise - 10% fall of FEV1
Note: Additional maintenance asthma controller medications (eg, LTRAs, tiotropium, cromone, theophylline) are allowed.
Sex and Contraceptive/Barrier Requirements
Female patients:
Inclusion criteria
5.1.2 Treatment Induction Phase at Visit 2 (Week 0):
Before dosing with tezepelumab at Week 0, patients should fulfil the following criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Medical Conditions
Prior/Concomitant Therapy
Prior/Concurrent Clinical Study Experience
Diagnostic Assessments
Other Exclusions
IMP. Subcutaneous injection. Unit dose strengths 210 mg.
Other names: TEZSPIRE®
AxMP. Oral inhalation. High-dose: 160 μg/4.5 μg per inhalation; Medium and Low-dose: 80 μg/4.5 μg per inhalation
Other names: SYMBICORT® pMDI
AxMP. Oral inhalation. Reliever only. Unit dose strengths 90 μg/80 μg per inhalation In US only.
Other names: AIRSUPRA®
NIMP. Oral nebulization. Unit dose strengths: Graduated doses of 0 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg and 40 mg capsules
Other names: ARIDOL®
AxMP. Used outside the US only. Oral inhalation. Unit dose strengths: 100 μg per inhalation
Other names: Sabumalin, albuterol, ventolin HFA, Proair HFA, Proventil HFA
Time frame: Week 56
Proportion of patients who reduced their SYMBICORT® daily maintenance dose without the loss of asthma control at the end of the step-down phase to either:
Outside of the US:
In the US:
Time frame: Week 24
Proportion of patients in asthma control at Week24.
Time frame: Week 24
Proportion of patients with characteristics of clinical remission at Week 24
Time frame: Week 56
Proportion of patients in asthma control at Week 56 among those in asthma control at Week 24; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down and for patients randomised to no step-down of ICS.
Time frame: Week 72
Proportion of patients in asthma control at Week 72 among those in asthma control at Week 24; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down and for patients randomised to no step-down of ICS.
Time frame: Week 56 and Week 72
Proportion of patients in asthma control at both Week 56 and Week 72 among those in asthma control at Week 24; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down and for patients randomised to no step-down of ICS.
Time frame: Week 56
Proportion of patients in asthma control at Week 56 among those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24
Time frame: Week 72
Proportion of patients in asthma control at Week 72 among those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24
Time frame: Week 56
Proportion of patients in clinical remission at Week 56 among those with characteristics of clinical remission at Week 24; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down and for patients randomised to no step-down of ICS.
Time frame: Week 72
Proportion of patients in clinical remission at Week 72 among those with characteristics of clinical remission at Week 24; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down and for patients randomised to no step-down of ICS.
Time frame: Week 56 and Week 72
Proportion of patients in clinical remission at both Week 56 and Week 72 among those with characteristics of clinical remission at Week 24; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down and for patients randomised to no step-down of ICS.
Time frame: Week 56
Proportion of patients in clinical remission at Week 56 among those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24
Time frame: Week 72
Proportion of patients in clinical remission at Week 72 among those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24
Time frame: Week 56
Proportion of patients in complete remission at Week 56; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: Week 72
Proportion of patients in complete remission at Week 72 among those in complete remission at Week 56; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: From Week 24 at Week 56
Change from Week 24 at Week 56 in:
Time frame: From Week 24 at Week 72
Change from Week 24 at Week 72 in:
Time frame: Between Week 24 and Week 56
Cumulative daily ICS dose (maintenance and rescue doses) between Week 24 and Week 56 both summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: Between Week 56 and Week 72
Cumulative daily ICS dose (maintenance and rescue doses) between Week 56 and Week 72 both summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: Between Week 24 and Week 72
Cumulative daily ICS dose (maintenance and rescue doses) between Week 24 and Week 72 both summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: Between Week 0 and Week 24
Annualised Asthma Exacerbation Rate between Week 0 and Week 24 among all tezepelumab-treated patients.
Time frame: Between Week 24 and Week 56
Annualised Asthma Exacerbation Rate between Week 24 and Week 56 summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: Between Week 56 and Week 72
Annualised Asthma Exacerbation Rate between Week 56 and Week 72 summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: Between Week 24 and Week 72
Annualised Asthma Exacerbation Rate between Week 24 and Week 72 summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: From baseline at Week 24
ACQ-5 score and changes from baseline at Week 24 among all tezepelumab-treated patients
Time frame: From Week 24 at Week 56
ACQ-5 score and changes from Week 24 at Week 56; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: From Week 24 at Week 72
ACQ-5 score and changes from Week 24 at Week 72; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: From baseline at Week 24
Proportion of ACQ-5 responders (improvement of≥ 0.5 in ACQ-5 score) from baseline at Week 24 among all tezepelumab-treated patients.
Time frame: From Week 24 at Week 56
Proportion of ACQ-5 responders (improvement of≥ 0.5 in ACQ-5 score) from Week 24 at Week 56; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: From Week 24 at Week 72
Proportion of ACQ-5 responders (improvement of≥ 0.5 in ACQ-5 score) from Week 24 at Week 72; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: From baseline at Week 24
SGRQ total score and changes from baseline at Week 24 among all tezepelumab-treated patients.
Time frame: From Week 24 at Week 56
SGRQ total score and changes from Week 24 at Week 56, summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: From Week 24 at Week 72
SGRQ total score and changes from Week 24 at Week 72, summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: From baseline at Week 24
Proportion of SGRQ responders (improvement of≥ 4 in SGRQ total score) from baseline at Week 24 among all tezepelumab-treated patients
Time frame: From Week 24 at Week 56
Proportion of SGRQ responders (improvement of≥ 4 in SGRQ total score) from Week 24 at Week 56; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: From Week 24 at Week 72
Proportion of SGRQ responders (improvement of≥ 4 in SGRQ total score) from Week 24 at Week 72; summarised separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: Baseline at Week 24
Asthma exacerbations, patient-reported outcomes, and lung function. Pre-BD FEV1 actual values and changes from baseline at Week 24 among all tezepelumab-treated patients.
Time frame: From Week 24 at Week 56
Pre-BD FEV1 total score and changes from Week 24 at Week 56, summarized separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24 among all tezepelumab-treated patients.
Time frame: From Week 24 at Week 72
Pre-BD FEV1 total score and changes from Week 24 at Week 72, summarized separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24 among all tezepelumab-treated patients.
Time frame: Week 24
Proportion of pre-BD FEV1 responders from baseline (defined as patients who achieve either a≥ 5% or ≥ 100 mL improvement from baseline) at Week 24, for all tezepelumab-treated patients
Time frame: Week 56
Proportion of pre-BD FEV1 responders at Week 56 among those who were pre-BDFEV1 responders at Week 24; summarized separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
Time frame: Week 72
. Proportion of pre-BD FEV1 responders at Week 72 among those who were pre-BDFEV1 responders at Week 24; summarized separately for patients randomised to ICS step-down, randomised to no ICS step-down, and those who demonstrated neither asthma control nor low biomarkers at Week 24.
AstraZeneca
Industry
A Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Phase IIIb Study to Assess the Potential for Tezepelumab-treated Patients With Severe Asthma to Reduce Background Therapy While Sustaining Asthma Control and Clinical Remission
Acronym: ARRIVAL
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07721376
Allergy and Asthma, Asthma
Córdoba, Cordoba, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07218172
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Tel Aviv, Israel
View Trial DetailsNCT06966479
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Bakersfield, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06566885
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Kaliningrad, Russia
View Trial Details