Spinal Cord Stimulation
DeviceDifferential target multiplexed stimulation
NCT Number: NCT07211308
Evaluation of the effectiveness of differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation for treatment of Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II (PSPS-T2). Identification of clinical effective parameters concerning frequency, pulse duration, amplitude and battery consumption/recharge frequency and safety evaluation.
Trial opening soon.
Get NotifiedAll sexes
Observational
UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Differential target multiplexed stimulation
Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
The primary effectiveness outcome measure is pain intensity measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain) in electronic format. Two scales will be presented for low back/neck pain and for leg/arm pain. Ecological momentary Assessment (EMA) will be used to collect pain intensity scores for VAS, whereby pain intensity is measured for multiple times per day for 1 week to reveal patterns of transient or fluctuating symptoms in the environment and context of the patients' lives, without a recall bias.
Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
Pain intensity for the lower back and leg pain or neck and arm pain component will be assessed separately with the Numeric Rating Scale (0 to 10). Pain intensity for the last 7 days will be assessed in electronic format, with and without medication use.
Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
Open question regarding the use of medication (collected through ecological momentary assessment for 1 week).
Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
Questions on a 9-point scale for negative affects, evaluated through ecological momentary assessment for 7 days.
Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
The Oswestry disability index (ODI; 0 to 100) or Neck disability index (NDI; 0 to 100) is used to measure functional disability due to abnormalities of the spine
Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
Health related quality of life, evaluated with the EuroQol with five dimensions and 5 levels
Time frame: Evaluated at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of DTM SCS
Patients will be asked to quantify the impression of change after treatment using the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC)
Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
This is a composite measure for success, relying on the combination of the above questionnaires.
Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
Work status is evaluated with a self-designed questionnaire
Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) will be used to measure the level of pain catastrophizing
Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
The hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will measure symptoms of anxiety and depression
Time frame: Evaluated at baseline visit
Self-constructed open question to evaluate patient expectations about SCS
Time frame: Evaluated at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of DTM SCS
investigated by self-reporting methods with 12 questions
Time frame: The data will be extracted from SCS implantation up to 1 month of SCS, from 1 month of SCS up to 6 months and from 6 months up to 12 months
Based on the AdaptiveStim technology, the time spent in body postures can be recorded
Time frame: Throughout study period, an average of 1 year
Systematically recording all adverse events
Time frame: Evaluated after final SCS implantation
Time frame: Registration at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of DTM SCS
Information from implantable pulse generators will be extracted.
Time frame: Time Frame: Registration at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of DTM SCS
Information from implantable pulse generators will be extracted.
Time frame: Registration at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months of DTM SCS
Information from implantable pulse generators will be extracted.
Time frame: Throughout study period, an average of 1 year
Time frame: The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
A Garmin Venue series watch will be used to collect actigraphy data. Devices are worn for 7 consecutive days. This data will only be collected at Belgian sites.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Lisa Goudman, PT, MSc, PhD
CONTACT
Maarten TA Moens, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Other
Open and Closed Loop Differential Target Multiplexed Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II: a European Multicenter Cohort Study (ENDLESS)
Acronym: ENDLESS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05421273
Back Pain, Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT05068011
Back Pain, Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Jette, Brussels Capital, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT06775535
Chronic Pain, Nervous System Diseases
Roeselare, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05861609
Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2, Spinal Cord Stimulation
Jette, Belgium
View Trial Details