Sunitinib
Drugsunitinib 37.5mg/d orally
NCT Number: NCT02264665
A descriptive, prospective (partly retrospective), multisite, observational study conducted in France in adult patients treated for a well differentiated, unresectable or metastatic, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with disease progression.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–99 year
All sexes
Observational
CHU d'Amiens, Amiens, France
prospective and retrospective Analyses will be performed using SAS® software
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
*Patients whose treatment line (targeted therapy or other treatment) is initiated as a 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th line of therapy at the time of inclusion (incident patients) or patients receiving their 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th line of therapy provided that treatment was initiated in the site in which the patient is enrolled in the study (prevalent patients); a change of line is defined as a change in molecule or combination.
Exclusion criteria
sunitinib 37.5mg/d orally
everolimus 10mg/d orally
depends on the chemotherapy prescribed (IV)
Time frame: At 2 years of prospective follow-up
PFS was defined as time (in months) from date of start of treatment (the treatment line ongoing at the time of inclusion in the study) to first documentation of disease progression (PD) or date of death due to any cause, when receiving the main treatment at the time of inclusion. RECIST v1.1, PD: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study treatment (this included baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of 1 or more new target or non-target lesions. If a participant did not have an event, data censoring was done at the last recorded time to PD or the last tumor assessment, last disease assessment. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: At 2 years of prospective follow-up
PFS was defined as time (in months) from date of start of treatment (the treatment line ongoing at the time of inclusion in the study) to first documentation of PD or date of death due to any cause, when receiving the main treatment at the time of inclusion. RECIST v1.1, PD: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study treatment (this included baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Appearance of 1 or more new target or non-target lesions. If a participant did not have an event, data censoring was done at the last recorded time to PD or the last tumor assessment, last disease assessment. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: At 2 years of prospective follow-up
OS was the percentage of participants who were alive at 2 years of prospective follow-up. OS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of start of treatment (of the treatment line ongoing at the time of inclusion in the study) to the date of death due to any cause. Participants with no event or lost to follow-up or alive at the end of the study were censored at their last follow-up date (last follow-up date or last news). Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: At 2 years of prospective follow-up
OS was the percentage of participants who were alive at 2 years of prospective follow-up. OS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of start of treatment (of the treatment line ongoing at the time of inclusion in the study) to the date of death due to any cause. Participants with no event or lost to follow-up or alive at the end of the study were censored at their last follow-up date (last follow-up date or last news). Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: any AE, regardless of dose, that: led to death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization; led to persistent or significant incapacity or led to congenital anomaly or birth defect. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in participant who received study drug. Relatedness to treatment was assessed by investigator. Per CTCAE 4.0, Grade 3 (Severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4=Life-threatening events Grade 5 (Death) events=death related to an AE. Participants in this outcome measure were grouped according to type of treatment received at least once during study irrespective of treatment they initiated or were receiving at time of inclusion.
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Participants in this outcome measure were grouped according to type of treatment received at least once during study irrespective of treatment they initiated or were receiving at time of inclusion.
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Adverse events leading to death are reported in this outcome measure. Participants in this outcome measure were grouped according to type of treatment received at least once during study irrespective of treatment they initiated or were receiving at time of inclusion.
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
Frequency = number of tumor assessment visits /([last visit date - baseline date]/365.25).
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
The different types of investigations were performed for assessment of tumor regardless of treatment received. Investigations performed were Computed Tomography (CT) scan, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan, Octreoscan, Ultrasound. All the investigations were used at least once during the study for all treatments.
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
In this outcome measure, number of participants with a change in treatment compared to treatment at inclusion is reported.
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
Number of participants according to number of changes in doses of treatment is reported for this outcome measure.
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
Number of participants according to course of changes in doses of treatment is reported for this outcome measure.
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
The number of lines of combined main treatment administered during the study were assessed.
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
The number of main lines of treatment received during the study treatment are reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: During 2 years of prospective follow-up
The types of main lines of treatment included 1st line, 2nd line, 3rd line, 4th line, 5th line, 6th line, 7th line and 8th line.
Pfizer
Industry
AN OBSERVATIONAL REAL-WORLD STUDY OF THE SYSTEMIC TREATMENT OF WELL-DIFFERENTIATED, UNRESECTABLE OR METASTATIC, PROGRESSIVE PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOURS (PNET): A STUDY OF MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY AT 2 YEARS
Acronym: OPALINE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05199584
Adenoma, Adenoma, Islet Cell
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03879694
Adenoma, Adenoma, Islet Cell
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04505553
Adenocarcinoma, Adenoma
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02159989
Adenoma, Adenoma, Islet Cell
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial Details