Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00602966

Oocyte Cryopreservation: Slow Cooling Versus Vitrification Techniques on Oocyte Survival

Oocyte cryopreservation has been studied for many years without much success in refining a method that has consistent, reliable results in producing viable embryos and clinical pregnancies. In 1986 the first baby was born from an embryo created from a frozen oocyte; however, since then there have been less than 150 births from frozen eggs. To date, there are no reportable adverse outcomes in the children born from frozen oocytes. The research continues to look at different methods of oocyte cryopreservation. Many smaller studies have been conducted with some success but larger clinical trials are needed to replicate these findings. The conventional cryopreservation technique has been slow cooling with differing methods of freezing; however, vitrification is now being researched as the potential cryopreserving method that holds some promise for the future.

Our hypothesis is the use of vitrification (quick freezing) to cryopreserve oocytes in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization will be more successful than slow freezing in oocyte survival, fertilization rate with ICSI and subsequent embryo development, implantation rate and pregnancy rate.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–36 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

The Center for Advanced Reproductive Services

Farmington, Connecticut, 06030-6224, United States

About this study

Cryopreservation of oocytes is desirable because it: 1) would allow infertility patients to store excess oocytes instead of embryos, eliminating some of the ethical and religious concerns that accompany embryo storage; 2) permit storage of donor oocytes to avoid donor-recipient synchronization difficulties; and 3) can help women who may face sterilization due to chemotherapy or radiation. Oocyte cryopreservation is therefore gaining in popularity as an option for infertility treatment as well as fertility preservation.

Oocyte cryopreservation using conventional slow-cooling methods has not had much success; however more recent results have provided more optimism (Boldt et al., 2003; Porcu et al., 1997; 2000; 2002; Yang et al., 1998; 1999; 2002; Winslow et al., 2001). Vitrification has also been employed (Hong et al., 1999; Kuleshova et al., 1999; Yoon et al., 2000, 2003; Chung et al 2000; Wu et al., 2001: Kuwayama et al., 2005) with increased oocyte survival rate and live births. Vitrification is performed by suspending the oocytes in a solution containing a high concentration of cryoprotectants and then plunging them directly into liquid nitrogen (Rall and Fahy, 1985). The advantage of this technique is to prevent the formation of ice crystals within the oocyte. However the toxic effect of the high concentration of the cryoprotectant media has been a concern. New vitrification techniques which attempt to accelerate the cooling rate by decreasing the cryosolution volume and concentration, may reduce the potential toxicity. In addition, a more rapid cooling rate results in reduced chilling injury (Vajta et al., 1998).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients ≤ 36 years old
  • Day #3 follicle stimulation hormone (FSH) < 10mIU/ml, and Estradiol < 70 pg/ml.
  • The study will be limited to couples who do not wish to cryopreserve excess embryos, who would otherwise have their excess oocytes discarded.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 35
  • Patients currently being seen in our offices

Exclusion criteria

  • Male partner requiring microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration or testicular sperm extraction (MESA/TESE) for sperm retrieval
  • Day #3 follicle stimulation hormone (FSH) > 10mIU/ml, or estradiol > 70 pg/ml
  • Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) >35

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Oocyte survival

    Time frame: When patient returns for thaw cycle

Secondary outcomes

  1. Implantation rate

    Time frame: 2 weeks after transfer of thawed oocyte

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

UConn Health

Other

Collaborators

  • EMD Serono

Registry information

Official study title

Oocyte Cryopreservation: Comparison of Slow Cooling Versus Vitrification Techniques on Oocyte Survival, Fertilization, and Embryo Development

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2010
First posted
Jan 28, 2008
Registry last updated
Oct 28, 2011

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.