Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04720495
Fourteen patients having anterior maxillary undercut defect were selected to match a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The participants were randomly allocated using a computer system into two groups:
Group A undergo inverted U-shaped maxillary ridge splitting using piezotomes with simultaneous implant placement in the same surgery.
Group B undergo inverted U-shaped maxillary ridge splitting as a first stage and after four weeks, ridge expansion and implant placement will be performed with only envelop flap.
Assessment included measurements of bone gain at the undercut defect and bone density labial to implants in each group from the cone-beam computed tomography
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Alexandria, Egypt
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A full mucoperiosteal flap was raised using the sharp periosteal elevator to expose the bone crestally and buccally.
An inverted U-shaped bone cut, down to the cancellous bone, was done in the undercut area with a piezoelectric device.
The horizontal bone cut was made apical to the most concave point in the undercut area with a distance of 3 mm.
The two vertical bone cuts were placed at least 1 mm away from the adjacent roots and extended beyond the undercut area.
The released bone end was minimally elevated using a periosteotome through a greenstick fracture.
All implants were installed with the implant shoulders flush to the bone level using a low-speed drilling procedure.
The first surgery is the same as one stage ridge splitting Four weeks later, after revascularization between the bone block and the mucoperiosteum, the second surgery will be performed.
A crestal incision was done and the envelope flap slightly elevated to preserve the blood supply.
The implants will be placed in the same manner as one stage ridge splitting
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Bone density was evaluated by CBCT
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
Bone width gain was evaluated by CBCT
Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Other
One-stage Versus Two-stage Inverted U-shaped Ridge Splitting With Simultaneous Implant Placement for Treatment of Anterior Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Undercut (a Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.