Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05563675

Once Daily Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists Administered in the Evening for Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations Requiring Hospitalization or Death from Any Cause

To examine, among once-daily LAMA using COPD patients, whether evening administration of LAMA is superior with respect to the incidence of hospitalization requiring AECOPD or death from all causes than the more conventional morning administration.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

30 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Herlev-Gentofte Hospital

Copenhagen, Denmark

About this study

One of the most feared complications associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is acute exacerbation (AECOPD). On average, each COPD patient experiences 0.5 to 3.5 acute exacerbations per year, which is an important reason for the hospitalization, disease progression and mortality as well as decline in health status and lung function(1,2).

Treatment with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) reduces dyspnoea and the risk of exacerbations in patients with COPD by binding to muscarinic receptors in bronchial smooth musculature and thus inhibiting cholinergic bronchial constriction. LAMAs are given as inhalation therapy once daily (most often) or twice daily(3).

Most COPD-patients experience their worst symptoms and experience exacerbations in early morning hours, before getting out of bed(4). This might be explained by the physiological diurnal changes in the activity of the parasympathetic homeostasis system since this is most active at night to improve digestion and other secretions(5).

Correspondingly, the activity of the sympathetic system is physiologically suppressed at night, and stimulation of β-2 receptors is thus also low (and opposite for M-3 receptors). Taken together, the balance of sympathetic-parasympathetic tone is shifted significantly towards the latter. Most available LAMA treatments are dosed once daily in the morning.

Thus, for a COPD patient, being at a trough level of LAMA (which antagonizes the para-sympathetic system) at late night/early morning, may carry a hazard for the patient.

Studies have found that lung function measured as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) improvement peaks approximately 2 hours after LAMA administration, and that FEV1 is still significantly improved at 7 hours post treatment but decreases towards the trough level of the LAMA(6). However, as a corollary to the above, when the medicine is probably most needed (02.00 a.m. to 07.00 a.m.), the effect is at its lowest level, which may not be desirable, since a low effect of the most important preventive medicine against AECOPD at this time, may lead to more exacerbations.

Evening administration, on the contrary, would lead to a greater and more certain effect regarding bronchodilation and reduced secretion in the early morning hours, and a maximum effect should be expected during the entire night.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age more than or equal to 30 years
  • Current treatment with LAMA once daily (as recorded in the Danish National Prescription Registry and confirmed by the participant via questionnaire)
  • Self-reported COPD

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who decline to participate.

Treatment and study plan

Long acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) in the evening

Drug

LAMAs administered at bedtime (8pm - 2am)

Primary outcomes

  1. COPD-related hospitalization-requiring (severe) exacerbations

    Time frame: 12 months from randomization

  2. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: 12 months from randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Moderate, non-hospitalization-requiring COPD exacerbations

    Time frame: 12 months from randomization

  2. Number of admissions for all causes

    Time frame: 12 months from randomization

  3. Number of admissions in the intensive care unit (ICU) for all causes

    Time frame: 12 months from randomization

  4. Number of admissions requiring non-invasive ventilation (NIV) treatment

    Time frame: 12 months from randomization

  5. Mortality (all-cause)

    Time frame: 12 months from randomization

  6. Use of short-acting β2-agonists (SABA); pick-up rate

    Time frame: 12 months from randomization

    Data collected from the Danish National Prescription Registry

  7. Change in COPD assesment test (CAT) score

    Time frame: 12 months from randomization

    Measured by questionnaire at 6 and 12 months post-randomization. Measured on a scale from 0 to 40. Score of 0-9 means low impact of COPD and score of 31-40 means very high impact.

  8. Change in medical research council (MRC) score

    Time frame: 12 months from randomization

    Measured by questionnaire at 6 and 12 months post-randomization. Measures baseline functional disability due to dyspnoea on a scale from 0 to 5, 0 meaning no disability and 5 meaning significant disability due to COPD.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Trial Network, Denmark

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparing Morning and Evening Dosing of Inhaled Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists for the Prevention of Hospitalization Requiring AECOPD or Death from All Causes - the LAMA by Night Study Utilizing a Comprehensive Nationwide Digital Platform for Recruitment Into a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Integrated with National Registries to Follow Outcomes

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Oct 3, 2022
Registry last updated
Feb 19, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.