Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06516796

Omitting of Lymphadenectomy is Acceptable for Lung Cancer Smaller Than 6 mm in Solid Size

Many studies suggested that selective lymph node sampling was acceptable for specific non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of omitting of lymphadenectomy for selected NSCLC.

Patients with small-sized (≤2 cm) NSCLC who underwent surgical resection between 2009 and 2022 were retrospectively screened.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Jiangsu Province Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, China

About this study

Many studies suggested that selective lymph node sampling was acceptable for specific non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of omitting of lymphadenectomy for selected NSCLC.

Patients with small-sized (≤2 cm) NSCLC who underwent surgical resection between 2009 and 2022 were retrospectively screened. The characteristics of patients with nodal metastasis were demonstrated. For selected patients, the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients with and without lymphadenectomy were compared. Log-rank test and Cox regression analysis were adopted for prognostic evaluation.

A total of 2713 NSCLC patients were enrolled, and 75 of them (2.76%) had nodal involvement. None of patients with pure ground glass opacity (0/945) had nodal metastasis, while 14 patients with part-solid (14/1260, 1.11%) and 61 patients with solid nodules (61/508, 12.01%) had nodal involvement. Patients with nodal metastasis had a minimum solid size of 6 mm. NSCLC with solid components < 6 mm (n=1588) had no nodal metastasis. Of them, 339 patients underwent sublobar resection without lymphadenectomy (SRN0), 1056 subjects received sublobar resection with lymphadenectomy (SRN1), and 190 patients received lobectomy plus lymphadenectomy (LRN1). Patients with SRN0 had a shorter operating time, less volume of drainage, a lower incidence of chylothorax (0 vs. 0.6% vs. 2.1%, P=0.012) and air leakage, as well as a shorter postoperative hospitalization (3 vs. 4 vs. 4 days, P<0.001) than those with SRN1 or LRN1. During a median follow-up of 61 months, no patient with SRN0 was dead or tumor recurrent. The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 100%, 99.2% and 98.5% for patients with SRN0, SRN1 and LRN1, respectively (P=0.370).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • pathologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • the maximum tumor diameter ≤2 cm
  • receiving surgical treatment between 2009-2022

Exclusion criteria

  • non-primary NSCLC;
  • with small cell lung cancer components;
  • undergoing preoperative neoadjuvant therapies;
  • with compromised resection;
  • malignant tumor history over the past five years.

Treatment and study plan

No intervention

Other

Patients were retrospectively screened.

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival (OS)

    Time frame: OS was defined from the surgical date to the date of death or the date of the last follow-up, whichever came first, assessed up to 14 years.

    OS was defined from the surgical date to the date of death or the date of the last follow-up. defined from the surgical date to the date of death or the date of the last follow-up.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Liang Chen

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jul 24, 2024
Registry last updated
Jul 24, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.