Omarigliptin
DrugOmarigliptin, 25 mg orally once weekly
Other names: MK-3102, MARIZEV®
NCT Number: NCT02906709
This study will examine the efficacy of omarigliptin 25 mg once weekly compared to placebo in Japanese patients with T2DM who have inadequate glycemic control on insulin monotherapy in addition to diet and exercise therapy. The primary hypothesis of the study is that omarigliptin 25 mg once weekly provides greater reduction in hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) compared with placebo as assessed by change from baseline to Week 16 [Phase A (double-blind period)].
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
After a screening period of up to 2 weeks followed by a pretreatment period of 2 or 10 weeks, each participant will be receiving assigned double-blind treatment (omarigliptin 25 mg or placebo once weekly) for approximately 16 weeks (Phase A) followed by 36 weeks of open-label treatment (omarigliptin 25 mg once weekly, Phase B). After the end of treatment each participant will be followed for 21 days.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Omarigliptin, 25 mg orally once weekly
Other names: MK-3102, MARIZEV®
Placebo to omarigliptin orally once weekly
Insulin will be administered subcutaneously during the trial as monotherapy; dosage and administration following each package insert.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 16
HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood. Participant whole blood samples were collected at baseline and Week 16 to determine the Constrained Longitudinal Data Analysis least squares mean HbA1c change from baseline (i.e., HbA1c at Week 16 minus HbA1c at baseline). Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. Data after glycemic rescue were excluded from this analysis. Negative data values indicated a reduction in HbA1c levels.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
An adverse event is defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event. Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. Data after glycemic rescue were excluded from this analysis.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
An adverse event is defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event. Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. The results for the Placebo→Omarigliptin group summarized data from the open label period only (36 weeks), which corresponds to the study interval in which those participants were exposed to omarigliptin.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
An adverse event is defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event. Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. Data after glycemic rescue were excluded from this analysis.
Time frame: Up to Week 52
An adverse event is defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event. Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. The results for the Placebo→Omarigliptin group summarized data from the open label period only (36 weeks), which corresponds to the study interval in which those participants were exposed to omarigliptin.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 16
Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. FPG is expressed as mg/dL. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 16 weeks of treatment to determine Constrained Longitudinal Data Analysis change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 16 minus FPG at baseline). Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. Data after glycemic rescue were excluded from this analysis. Negative data values indicated a reduction in FPG levels.
Time frame: Week 16
HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood. Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. Data after glycemic rescue were excluded from this analysis. Each of the 10 imputed data sets was summarized to obtain the percentage of responders within each group and were combined using standard multiple imputation techniques to yield an overall estimate of response rate and associated variance for each group. A constrained longitudinal data analysis was used to analyze the data and Wilson score method by treatment groups used for the analysis of percentages of individuals at the HbA1c goals of <7.0% at Week 16 and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Miettinen & Nurminen (M&N) method after imputations were used to calculate the treatment differences of the percentages of individuals and the 95% CIs.
Time frame: Week 16
HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood. Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. Data after glycemic rescue were excluded from this analysis. Each of the 10 imputed data sets was summarized to obtain the percentage of responders within each group and were combined using standard multiple imputation techniques to yield an overall estimate of response rate and associated variance for each group. A constrained longitudinal data analysis was used to analyze the data and Wilson score method by treatment groups used for the analysis of percentages of individuals at the HbA1c goals of <6.5% at Week 16 and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Miettinen & Nurminen (M&N) method after imputations were used to calculate the treatment differences of the percentages of individuals and the 95% CIs.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 16
1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) is a marker of short-term glycemic control especially postprandial hyperglycemia. 1,5-AG accurately predicts rapid changes in glycemia and is tightly associated with glucose fluctuations and postprandial glucose. Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. Data after glycemic rescue were excluded from this analysis. Data (1,5-AG at Week 16 minus 1,5-AG at baseline) was analyzed by Constrained Longitudinal Data Analysis. Positive data values indicate an increase in 1,5-AG levels and correlate with an improvement in glycemia.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood. Participant whole blood samples were collected at baseline and Week 52 to determine the mean HbA1c change from baseline (i.e., HbA1c at Week 52 minus HbA1c at baseline). Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. Negative data values indicated a reduction in HbA1c levels.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. FPG is expressed as mg/dL. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 52 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 52 minus FPG at baseline). Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. Negative data values indicated a reduction in FPG levels.
Time frame: Week 52
HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood. Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. For the HbA1c goals of <7.0% at Week 52, the percentage of participants and the 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Wilson score method by treatment groups of the double-blind period.
Time frame: Week 52
HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood. Participants that met rescue criteria had their insulin dose adjusted as determined clinically appropriate by the investigator to manage glycemic control. For the HbA1c goals of <6.5% at Week 52, the percentage of participants and the 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Wilson score method by treatment groups of the double-blind period.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase IV, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind Trial and Subsequent Open-Label, Extension Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Addition of Omarigliptin in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Insulin Monotherapy in Addition to Diet and Exercise Therapy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05313529
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05684341
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Changhua, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07255820
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Diabetes Mellitus
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial Details