Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02531438

Omadacycline vs Moxifloxacin for the Treatment of CABP (EudraCT #2013-004071-13)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of omadacycline as compared to moxifloxacin in the treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Site 220, Liège, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients, ages 18 years or older who have signed the informed consent
  • Has qualifying bacterial pneumonia
  • Female patients must not be pregnant at the time of enrollment
  • Must agree to a reliable method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug

Exclusion criteria

  • Known or suspected hospital-acquired pneumonia
  • Evidence of significant immunological disease
  • Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any tetracycline or to any fluoroquinolone antibiotic
  • Has received an investigational drug within past 30 days
  • Women who are pregnant or nursing

Treatment and study plan

Omadacycline

Drug

Injection for IV; Oral tablets

moxifloxacin

Drug

IV solution; Oral tablets

Other names: Avelox

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Early Clinical Response

    Time frame: Screening; 72 to 120 hours after the first dose of test article

    Early clinical response is defined as clinical success, categorized by survival with improvement of at least 1 level compared to Baseline in at least 2 CABP symptoms (cough, sputum production, pleuritic chest pain, and dyspnea) with no worsening in the other CABP symptoms. Response was determined programmatically using the investigator's assessment of the CABP symptoms. The severity of the participant's CABP symptoms was evaluated on a 4-point scale (absent, mild, moderate, or severe) based upon the CABP Subject Symptom Severity Guidance Framework for Investigator Assessment. An indeterminate response is defined as one that could not be adequately inferred because the participant was not assessed because they withdrew consent, were lost to follow-up, or other specified reason. Clinical failure is defined as no improvement by at least 1 level in CABP symptoms, worsening of any CABP symptom, alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP, discontinuation due to adverse event, or death.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the ITT Population at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit

    Time frame: Screening; 5 to 10 days after the last day of therapy

    At the PTE Visit the investigator indicated one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: survival after completion of a test article regimen without receiving any systemic antibacterial therapy other than test article, resolution of signs/symptoms of the infection present at Screening with no new symptoms/complications attributable to CABP and no need for further antibacterial therapy. Clinical Failure: alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP was required prior to the PTE Visit related to either (a) progression/development of new CABP symptoms or (b) development of infectious complications of CABP. Other reasons for clinical failure: participant received antibiotics that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; death prior to the PTE Visit. Indeterminate: the clinical response to test article could not be adequately inferred.

  2. Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response in the Clinically Evaluable-Post Therapy Evaluation (CT-PTE) Population

    Time frame: Screening; 5 to 10 days after the last day of therapy

    At the PTE Visit the investigator indicated one of the following outcomes relating to the primary infection under study: Clinical Success: survival after completion of a test article regimen without receiving any systemic antibacterial therapy other than test article, resolution of signs/symptoms of the infection present at Screening with no new symptoms/complications attributable to CABP and no need for further antibacterial therapy. Clinical Failure: alternative antibacterial treatment for CABP was required prior to the PTE Visit related to either (a) progression/development of new CABP symptoms or (b) development of infectious complications of CABP. Other reasons for clinical failure: participant received antibiotics that may have been effective for the infection under study for a different infection from the one under study; death prior to the PTE Visit.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Omadacycline Intravenous (IV)/Oral (PO) to Moxifloxacin IV/PO for Treating Adults Subjects With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Aug 24, 2015
Registry last updated
Jan 16, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.