Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00441350

Olmesartan/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg Combination Therapy Versus Olmesartan Medoxomil 40 mg Monotherapy in Essential Hypertension

The primary objective of this study was to assess the anti-hypertensive effect of OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg combination therapy compared to OM 40 mg monotherapy in lowering sitting diastolic BP in hypertensive patients after 8 weeks of double-blind treatment.

The study consisted of two sequential phases of 8 weeks duration each:

During the first phase, OM 40 mg monotherapy was compared with OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg in order to evaluate the additional benefit of OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg in the treatment of essential moderate to severe hypertension.

During the second phase, patients whose BP proved to be insufficiently controlled by the OM 40 mg monotherapy were to start OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg combination therapy while patients whose BP proved to be insufficiently controlled by the OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg combination were to be up-titrated to the OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg combination to evaluate the additional benefit of the up-titrated combination.

The study was be conducted by qualified and experienced personnel with adherence to GCP, current guidelines on the design of studies in hypertension, the applicable regulatory requirements and the ethical principles based on the Declaration of Helsinki.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Rijeka, Croatia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Methodology:

After the signature of the informed consent, patients were screened for eligibility and eligible patients entered into a pre-randomisation period consisting of a taper-off phase of approximately 1-2 weeks (during which patients treated for hypertension were to discontinue their antihypertensive therapy) followed by a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in phase (Visit 1). After conclusion of the placebo run-in phase (Visit 2), eligible patients were randomised to the double-blind active treatment period which consisted of two phases:

First double-blind treatment phase (Phase A, from Randomisation to Week 8):

Eligible patients with mean sitting sBP ≥ 160 and ≤ 200 mmHg and dBP ≥ 100 mmHg and ≤ 120 mmHg were randomised in a 1:2 ratio to receive either OM 40 mg or OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg for a total of 8 weeks of treatment (Phase A). Study visits were held after 4 and 8 weeks of double-blind active treatment (Visit 3 and 4, respectively). After 8 weeks (Visit 4), patients reaching the BP goal of < 140/90 mmHg or < 130/80 mmHg for diabetics were considered as responders. All patients (responders and non-responders) then entered into the titration phase of the study (Phase B):

Second double-blind treatment phase/titration phase (Phase B, from Week 8 to Week 16):

Treatment assignment in the second part of the study was based on the following criteria:

  • Responders to Phase A treatment continued to receive the same double-blind treatment for an additional 8 weeks.
  • Non-responders Phase A treatment had their treatment assigned as follows:
  • Non-responders to OM 40 mg were treated with OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg for an additional 8 weeks.
  • Non-responders to OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg were uptitrated to OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg for an additional 8 weeks. During Phase B of the study, visits were held 12 and 16 weeks after randomisation (Visits 5 and 6, respectively).

The study ended at Visit 6 and a final examination was performed. A safety follow-up (SFU) telephone contact was performed 2 weeks after the end of the treatment. An SFU visit was performed if deemed necessary by the investigator.

Sphygmomanometer was used for BP measurement throughout the trial. BP was measured at all visits as nearly as possible at the same time of the day as trough readings (24 ± 2 h after last drug intake) after a 10 minute rest period. Three separate sitting BP measurements were taken at least 1 minute apart from each other. The 3 results were then averaged and rounded to a whole integer.

Patients with sBP values > 200 mmHg and/or dBP values > 120 mmHg at any time during the study were to be discontinued from the study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a diagnosis of essential hypertension, either treatment-naive or including currently on anti-hypertensive medication (in Italy only treatment naive patients) in whom it is medically justifiable to withdraw treatment , and who are likely to meet the required BP inclusion criteria at randomisation:
  • Mean sitting dBP ≥ 100 mmHg and ≤ 120 mmHg.
  • Mean sitting sBP ≥ 160 mmHg and ≤ 200 mmHg.

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mean sitting sBP values > 200 mmHg and/or dBP > 120 mmHg.
  • Pregnant or nursing women.
  • Patients with serious disorders which may limit the ability to evaluate the efficacy or safety of the tested medication, including cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, renal, respiratory, hepatic, gastrointestinal, endocrine or metabolic, haematological, oncological, neurological, and psychiatric diseases. The same applies for immunocompromised and/or neutropenic patients.
  • Patients with secondary hypertension of any aetiology such as renal disease, pheochromocytoma, or Cushing's syndrome.

Treatment and study plan

OM 40

Drug

Initially patients were to be treated with Olmesartanmedoxomil (OM)40 mg tablets once daily for 8 weeks. After 8 weeks non-responders were to be uptitrated to OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg and responders remained on the previous therapy for further 8 weeks.

Other names: Treatment

OM/HCTZ 40/12.5

Drug

Initially patients were to be treated with Olmesartanmedoxomil (OM) /Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)40/12.5 mg tablets once daily for 8 weeks. After 8 weeks non-responders were to be uptitrated to OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg and responders remained on the previous therapy for further 8 weeks.

Other names: Treatment

Primary outcomes

  1. dBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase A

    Time frame: Eight weeks

    Reduction in Mean Trough Sitting dBP (mmHg) from Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8

  2. sBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase A

    Time frame: Eight weeks

    Reduction in Mean Trough Sitting sBP (mmHg) from Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. dBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase B

    Time frame: Eight weeks

    Reduction in trough sitting diastolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of additional treatment, depending on Phase A treatment and outcome (responder/non-responder).

  2. sBP Change After 8 Weeks Phase B

    Time frame: Eight weeks

    Reduction in trough sitting systolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of additional treatment, depending on Phase A treatment and outcome (responder/non-responder).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Menarini Group

Industry

Collaborators

  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe, GmbH, a Daiichi Sankyo Company

Registry information

Official study title

Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil/Hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg Combination Therapy Versus Olmesartan Medoxomil 40 mg Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Feb 28, 2007
Registry last updated
Jul 28, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.