Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04018898

Older Emergency Department Users and Short-term Adverse Events at the Index Visit

This study evaluates the difference between PRISMA-7 and ER2 tool. There are some differences between PRISMA-7 and ER2 tool. The differences consist in evaluation criteria that are used to perform the both surveys. We suppose that evaluation criteria of PRISMA-7 is not accurately enough to calculate the length of hospital stay and to predict the short-term outcomes.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

75 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Jewish General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada

About this study

The "Program of Research on Integration of Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy" (PRISMA-7) is the Ministry of Health and Social Services' reference tool for the assessment of older ED users in Quebec (Canada). PRISMA-7 has been initially designed to screen disability in community-dwelling older adults and has never been validated for risk for short-term adverse events in older ED users. "Emergency room evaluation and recommendations" (ER2) is another clinical tool which is currently evaluated in Quebec. Compared to PRISMA-7, ER2 has been especially designed for assessing risk for short-term ED adverse events. No study has compared PRISMA-7 and ER2 risk for short-term adverse events. We hypothesised that ER2 could be a better prognostic tool compared to PRISMA-7 for long length of stay in ED and hospital stay, and hospital admission because it was designed and validated for this specific goal. The study aims to 1) examine and compared PRISMA-7 and ER2 risk for long length of ED and hospital stay and hospital admission, and 2) to establish their performance criteria (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratios) for these three short-term adverse events in older ED users.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being 75 years old and over
  • Brought at Emergency on medical stretcher

Exclusion criteria

  • Being less than 75 years old
  • Never come at Emergency

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Short-term adverse events

    Time frame: Around 10 months

    The adverse event is defined as an adverse outcome related to an ED encounter, this adverse event is related to ED care.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Jewish General Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Older Emergency Department Users and Short-term Adverse Events at the Index Visit: Which Clinical Prognostic Tool is Used?

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jul 15, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 23, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.