full-dose olanzapine
Drugtrifluoperazine 5mg/d
Other names: polypharmacy
NCT Number: NCT02704962
The investigators hypothesis is that an antipsychotic drug combination of low-dose olanzapine plus low-dose trifluoperazine is similar to regular-dose olanzapine monotherapy in efficacy and safety for treatment of schizophrenia.The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the olanzapine (10 mg/d) and olanzapine (5 mg/d) plus trifluoperazine (5 mg/d) in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Antipsychotic monotherapy is recognized as the treatment of choice for patients with schizophrenia. Surveys have shown that antipsychotic polypharmacy are frequently prescribed, yet few randomized, double-blind clinical trials have examined this practice. Olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic agent, has low incidence of extrapyramidal symptom but with high cost compared to trifluoperazine. It has been reported that mean doses of typical antipsychotics less than 600 mg per day of chlorpromazine or its equivalent has no higher risk of extrapyramidal symptom than atypical antipsychotics. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the olanzapine (10 mg per day) and olanzapine (5 mg per day) plus trifluoperazine (5 mg per day) in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia. In this 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, patients with schizophrenia are randomly assigned to olanzapine (10 mg per day)) or olanzapine (5 mg per day) plus trifluoperazine (5 mg per day). The hypothesis is that the two treatment groups have the similar efficacy and safety, but different cost. The primary efficacy measure is change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores; secondary outcomes include Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF), Short Form-36 (SF-36), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Safety assessments include the change from baseline on Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SAS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS), and UKU Side-effects Rating Scale, and the change from baseline in prolactin levels, body weight, vital sign, blood pressure, Bazett's correction of QT interval (QTc interval), fasting glucose level, and lipid panel (cholesterol, high density lipid protein, low density lipid protein, and triglyceride).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
trifluoperazine 5mg/d
Other names: polypharmacy
Time frame: The PANSS was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
Time frame: The CGI-S was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
Time frame: The CDSS was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
Time frame: The GAF was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
Time frame: The SF-36 was rated at baseline and again at week 6.
Time frame: The MMSE was rated at baseline and again at week 6.
Time frame: The SAS was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
Time frame: The AIMS was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
Time frame: The BAS was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
Time frame: The UKU was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
Time frame: The QTc interval was assayed at baseline and again at week 6.
Time frame: The body weight was assayed at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
Time frame: The fasting glucose level was assayed at baseline and again at week 6.
Time frame: The prolactin level was assayed at baseline and again at week 6.
Time frame: The cholesterol level was assayed at baseline and again at week 6.
Time frame: The HDL level was assayed at baseline and again at week 6.
Time frame: The LDL level was assayed at baseline and again at week 6.
Time frame: The triglyceride level was assayed at baseline and again at week 6.
Kaohsiung Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital
Other Gov
A Randomized, Double-blind, Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Olanzapine Versus Low-dose Olanzapine Plus Low-dose Trifluoperazine in the Treatment of Schizophrenia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05838573
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Changsha, Hunan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05304767
Mental Disorders, Schizophrenia
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00004571
Mental Disorders, Normal Physiology
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05808244
Mental Disorders, Psychosis
Kowloon, Hong Kong
View Trial Details