Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415, United States
NCT Number: NCT03211897
The goal of this research investigation is to conduct a prospective observational study of the comparative efficacy of haloperidol versus olanzapine versus midazolam versus ziprasidone for the treatment of acute undifferentiated agitation in the emergency department.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415, United States
The ED will implement a treatment protocol as a quality improvement initiative. All patients requiring chemical sedation for will receive haloperidol as the initial treatment for agitation for 21 days, followed by ziprasidone as the initial treatment for agitation for 21 days, followed by olanzapine as the initial treatment for agitation for 21 days, and finally midazolam as the initial treatment for agitation for 21 days.
This is a clinical care quality improvement protocol. The research component is the observation of this clinical care protocol.
Patients who receive medications in the ED will be observed by research staff, evaluating efficacy and safety of the administered medication. The decision to administer the medication is at the discretion of the physician. Research protocols are only such that we are observing the efficacy and safety, which coincides the quality improvement purposes of this clinical protocol.
Trained Research Associates will collect all data on patients who receive a protocol medication. This will include baseline demographic data including age, gender, etiology of agitation (according to the treating physician, presumed at the time of medication administration), initial vital signs, breath alcohol level, drug screen results, pre-hospital medications administered, and any other laboratory data available at the time (e.g. glucose).
Research associates will record the patient's level of agitation using a validated agitation scale, the Altered Mental Status (AMS scale). The AMS scale is an ordinal scale ranging from -4 (profoundly somnolent) to +4 (profoundly agitated), with agitation generally defined as an AMS scale of 2 or greater. This scale is a modified version of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness Scale and the Behavioral Activity Rating Scale.
AMS scores will be recorded at the time of medication administration and at every subsequent 15-minute interval until 120 minutes. Research associates will also carry stopwatches and record the time elapsed until adequate sedation (defined as an AMS ≤ 0), as well as whether other medications (defined as "rescue medications") were administrated for any reason and at what time this occurred.
Research associates will prospectively monitor each patient for all adverse side effects of the medications, including hypoxia, need for airway intervention (nasal cannula, facemask, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, endotracheal intubation), hypotension, cardiac dysrhythmias, extrapyramidal side effects, and other complications.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
As part of the quality initiative protocol, patients who are treated for acute agitation in the ED will receive haloperidol as their initial sedative agent during the 21 day block. All subsequent agitation medications are at the discretion of the provider.
As part of the quality initiative protocol, patients who are treated for acute agitation in the ED will receive ziprasidone as their initial sedative agent during the 21 day block. All subsequent agitation medications are at the discretion of the provider.
As part of the quality initiative protocol, patients who are treated for acute agitation in the ED will receive olanzapine as their initial sedative agent during the 21 day block. All subsequent agitation medications are at the discretion of the provider.
As part of the quality initiative protocol, patients who are treated for acute agitation in the ED will receive midazolam as their initial sedative agent during the 21 day block. All subsequent agitation medications are at the discretion of the provider.
Time frame: 15 minutes
Patients score on a previously validated agitation scale called the AMSS
ADDENDUM: The primary outcome for this study was changed prior to study initiation to the proportion of patients adequately sedated at 15 minutes (defined as AMSS < 1). This addendum was methodologically necessary to account for the ordinal, non-normal distribution of this data.
Time frame: Within the 120 minutes post-medication administration
The time elapsed in minutes to achieve a score of < 1 on a validated agitation scale called the AMSS
Time frame: 1 hour
Proportion of patients requiring additional medication for sedation within 1 hour
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute
Other
Prospective Observational Investigation of Olanzapine Versus Haloperidol Versus Ziprasidone Versus Midazolam for the Treatment of Acute Undifferentiated Agitation in the Emergency Department
Acronym: MOHZA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03926520
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Agitation,Psychomotor
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04957238
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Agitation,Psychomotor
Aurillac, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04276883
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Agitation Associated With Bipolar Disorder
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04251910
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Agitation,Psychomotor
Homestead, Florida, United States
View Trial Details