UPMC St. Margaret
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15215, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Benedict J Alter, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Benedict J Alter, MD, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maya L Maurer, BS
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT05961800
This study examines the relationship between central nervous system (CNS) mechanisms of pain inhibition and the pain relief that occurs following a lumbar medial branch block (MBB).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15215, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Benedict J Alter, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Benedict J Alter, MD, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maya L Maurer, BS
CONTACT
This study examines the relationship between central nervous system (CNS) mechanisms of pain inhibition and the pain relief that occurs following a commonly-performed nerve block used to diagnose and treat chronic low back pain. Patients scheduled for lumbar medial branch blocks as part of routine clinical care will arrive to clinic prior to the block for quantitative sensory testing procedures that measure CNS pain modulation. Patients will then undergo treatment as usual with their block, subsequently reporting low back pain intensity in a pain diary.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A computer-controlled probe delivers temperatures to the skin to measure pain, offset analgesia and onset hyperalgesia.
Standard methods involving pinprick, pressure, heat, and cold applied to the skin are used to measure sensation and pain
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) and computer tasks are used to measure changes in pain intensity.
Time frame: during this portion of the study visit (30 minutes)
Pain intensity difference during heat stimuli measured on a 0-100 sliding scale (0 is no pain, 100 is the most intense pain imaginable) at baseline
Time frame: Immediately after lumbar medial branch block and up to 16 hours after lumbar medial branch block
Patients respond to the question "How would you rate your back pain right now?" from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) to see how intense their back pain is each hour after the lumbar medial branch block.
Time frame: Baseline
Participant self-reports the number of years they have experienced low back pain. The number of years for each participant will be reported.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment for self-reported average pain and pain interference within past 7 days. Responses range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Total scores range from 0-30, and higher scores indicate more pain interference.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment for determining how much a person hurts with a question ranked on a 11-point scale, from "0 = no pain" to "10 = worst imaginable pain." The minimum raw summed score is 0 and the maximum score is 10. Lower raw response scores suggest lower pain intensity and better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment for self-reported consequences of pain with 4 questions ranked on a 5-point scale, from "not at all" to "very much". The minimum raw summed score is 4 and the maximum score is 20. Lower scores suggest better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment for self-reported capability with 6 qualitatively scaled questions ranked on a 5-point scale, from "without any difficulty" to "unable to do" or "not at all" to "cannot do." The minimum raw summed score is 6 and the maximum score is 30.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment for self-reported perceptions of sleep quality and sleep depth with 6 questions ranked on a 5-point scale. The minimum raw summed score is 6 and the maximum score is 30. Lower scores suggest better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline
Standardized survey score assessing pain perception before the study procedures begin. Rumination subscale score ranges from 0-16. Magnification subscale score ranges 0-12. Helplessness subscale score ranges from 0-24. Total score can be calculated by summing subscales. Total score ranges from 0-52, with higher scores indicating more pain catastrophizing.
Time frame: Baseline
The PHQ-2 inquires about the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia over the past two weeks. The PHQ-2 includes the first two items of the PHQ-9. A PHQ-2 score ranges from 0-6. The authors identified a score of 3 as the optimal cutpoint when using the PHQ-2 to screen for depression.
If the score is 3 or greater, major depressive disorder is likely.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment for self-reported negative mood and views of self with 4 questions ranked on a 5-point scale, from "never" to "always". The minimum raw summed score is 4 and the maximum score is 20. Lower t-scores suggest better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment for self-reported fear, anxious misery, hyperarousal, and somatic symptoms with 4 questions ranked on a 5-point scale, from "never" to "always". The minimum raw summed score is 4 and the maximum score is 20. Lower scores suggest better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline
The digital body figure contains 36 anterior regions and 38 posterior regions on which participants can mark areas in which they experience chronic pain. The number of pain areas each participant recorded will be reported, with a possibility of 74 total regions.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment for the subject's expectations of treatment effec prior to lumbar medial branch block. Scores range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), with total scores ranging from 0-24. Higher scores indicate higher expectations of the low back pain treatement.
Time frame: Immediately after lumbar medial branch block
The subject's impression of the impact of the lumbar medial branch block on their pain and function will be measured with a 7-item scale (1 = very much worse, 2 = much worse, 3 = minimally worse, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally improved, 6 = much improved, 7 = very much improved).
Time frame: Immediately after lumbar medial branch block
Standardized survey score assessing pain perception immediately following the lumbar medial branch block. Scores range from 0-24, with higher scores representing more pain catastrophizing.
Time frame: during this portion of the study visit (60 minutes)
Changes in pain intensity during quantitative sensory tests measured on a 0-100 sliding scale (0 is no pain, 100 is the most intense pain imaginable)
Time frame: baseline
Patients respond to the question "How would you rate your back pain on average?" from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) to see how intense their back pain is before the lumbar medial branch block.
Time frame: Immediately after lumbar medial branch block and up to 16 hours after lumbar medial branch block
Patients respond to the question "How would you rate your back pain right now?" from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) to see how intense their back pain is each hour after the lumbar medial branch block.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Benedict J Alter, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Maya L Maurer, BS
CONTACT
University of Pittsburgh
Other
OMEGA Study: Offset Mechanisms in Evaluation of Lumbar Medial Branch Block
Acronym: OMEGA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06282666
Acute Pain, Agnosia
Lublin, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05363241
Agnosia, Analgesia
Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT04403711
Acute Pain, Agnosia
Athens, Attica, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT04623827
Agnosia, Analgesia
Bologna, Italy
View Trial Details