Occlusal adjustment
Proceduremodification of occlusal surfaces
Other names: Selective grinding, Occlusal reshaping, Occlusal equilibration, Occlusal therapy
NCT Number: NCT00899717
The purpose of this study is to determine whether occlusal adjustment by selective grinding and/or occlusal addition is an effective treatment of chronic temporomandibular joint disorders.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de La Coruña, A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are very common disorders in daily dentistry and oral and maxillofacial practice. The key symptoms are jaw joint pain and limited mouth opening. Other than trauma, the causes remain unknown; consequently, there are no treatments based on specific etiologies. In our experience, patients can usually receive beneficial occlusal adjustments if these are carefully planned and performed in two steps: (1) elimination of premature contacts, which reduces loads in the temporomandibular joints, and (2) individualized remodeling of lateral anterior guidance to facilitate unilateral alternate chewing. The study will use stratified blocking randomization to blindly assign patients to the real or placebo treatment groups in order to evaluate the null hypothesis (H0) that "Occlusal adjustment of sufficient quality has no effect on chronic pain and/or limited mouth opening in TMD patients."
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
modification of occlusal surfaces
Other names: Selective grinding, Occlusal reshaping, Occlusal equilibration, Occlusal therapy
Simulated modification of occlusal surfaces
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after therapy, 3 months and 6 months after therapy
The primary outcome was self-reported pain intensity on a 0 to 10 cm visual analog scale considering the temporomandibular disorder side, being 0="No pain" and 10="Worst imaginable pain"
Time frame: Before and 6 months after therapy
Scale name: Global Severity Index. Scale graded from 0 to 4. Scores increases as the symptoms severity increases.
Time frame: Before and 6 months after therapy
The change in the habitual chewing side of each participant across the study
Time frame: 6 months (before and after therapy) including 4 assessment points: pre-treatment, post-treatment, 3- and 6-month follow up
Maximum voluntary unassisted mouth opening
Time frame: Baseline
Parasagittal plane condylar path angles tracings in relation to the Frankfort line were made following the Gysi extraoral method.
University of Santiago de Compostela
Other
Basis for an Etiological Diagnosis and Treatment of the Chronic TMD-pain: RCT Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07624539
Craniomandibular Disorders, Facial Pain
Steamboat Springs, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04967131
Craniomandibular Disorders, Facial Pain
Istanbul, Beykoz, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06132594
Craniomandibular Disorders, Facial Pain
Asyut, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04524806
Craniomandibular Disorders, Facial Pain
View Trial Details